植物合成生物学：植物细胞大规模培养的新机遇

doi:10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095

合成生物学

• 特约评述 •

植物合成生物学：植物细胞大规模培养的新机遇

颜钊涛²^,³, 周鹏飞⁴, 汪阳忠¹, 张鑫¹, 谢雯燕¹, 田晨菲¹^,², 王勇²

^1.上海烟草集团有限责任公司烟草行业卷烟烟气重点实验室，上海 201315
^2.中国科学院上海植物生理生态研究所，中国科学院分子植物科学卓越创新中心，中国科学院合成生物学重点实验室，上海 200032
^3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
^4.广东医科大学，基础医学院，东莞 523808

收稿日期:2024-12-18 修回日期:2025-02-24 出版日期:2025-02-24
通讯作者: 田晨菲,王勇
作者简介:颜钊涛（1998—），男，硕士研究生。主要研究方向为植物合成生物学及植物细胞培养。E-mail：yanzhaotao@cemps.ac.cn
田晨菲（1995—），女，博士后，主要研究方向为植物合成生物学。E-mail：tianchenfei@cemps.ac.cn
王勇（1974—），男，博士生导师，研究员，主要研究方向为天然产物合成生物学，通过解析天然产物的生物合成途径，运用合成生物学的思想和方法，基于工程化的设计和建构，改进复杂天然产物的生物合成效率和其生产方式，开发天然的或非天然的复杂天然产物活性成分。E-mail：yongwang@cemps.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(SQ2024YFA1700126);上海市市级重大专项(24HC2820400);上海烟草集团有限责任公司行业卷烟烟气重点实验室开放性课题(K2023-1-044P)

Plant synthetic biology: New opportunities for large-scale culture of Plant Cells

Zhaotao YAN²^,³, Pengfei ZHOU⁴, Yangzhong WANG¹, Xin ZHANG¹, Wenyan XIE¹, Chenfei TIAN¹^,², Yong WANG²

^1.Key Laboratory of Cigarette Smoke in tobacco industry，Shanghai Tobacco Group Co. ，Ltd，Shanghai 201315，China
^2.Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology，CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences，Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Shanghai 200032，China
^3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing
^4.100049，China
^5.School of Basic Medical Sciences，Guangdong Medical University，Dongguan 523808，China

Received:2024-12-18 Revised:2025-02-24 Online:2025-02-24
Contact: Chenfei TIAN, Yong WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物细胞培养（Plant cell culture， PCC）作为一种极具发展潜力的生物合成平台，具有生长周期短、成本效益高、无病源危害、次生代谢产物丰富等优势，在医药、食品和保健等领域备受关注。然而，生产效率不足是限制PCC应用于商业化生产的最大阻碍，问题在于遗传转化困难、调控网络复杂、细胞结团及遗传稳定性差。合成生物学遵循自下而上的工程化建造理念，对天然植物细胞进行精准设计与改造，为开发高效、经济可行的植物细胞工厂提供了新的解决方案。本文首先回顾了PCC作为合成平台在生产重组蛋白和次生代谢产物中的研究现状。重点探讨了植物合成生物学对PCC的工业化发展中的推动作用，包括优质植物细胞系的构建、遗传转化体系的优化、表达系统的优化、生产效率与产能的提升以及赋予植物细胞合成异源产物的能力。最后，本文对PCC未来的发展前景进行了展望，强调了合成生物学理念和技术在突破当前技术瓶颈中的关键作用，为植物细胞大规模培养的进一步发展指明了方向。

关键词: 植物合成生物学, 植物细胞, 生物合成, 天然产物, 基因工程

Abstract:

Plant Cell Culture (PCC) has emerged as a highly promising synthetic biology chassis, offering a range of advantages such as short growth cycles, cost-effectiveness, absence of pathogenic risks, and abundant secondary metabolites. These features make PCC an attractive alternative option for applications in medicine, food, and health. However, insufficient production efficiency due to difficulties in genetic transformation, complex regulatory networks, cell aggregation, and poor genetic stability remains a major obstacle, limiting the commercialization of PCC. Synthetic biology, with its bottom-up engineering design approach, provides a powerful toolkit to address these challenges. By enabling the precise design and modification of native plant cells, synthetic biology offers innovative strategies to develop efficient and economically viable plant cell factories. In this paper, we first review the current status of PCC in synthesizing high-value compounds, particularly recombinant proteins and secondary metabolites. Recent advancements have demonstrated the potential of PCC to produce therapeutic proteins, vaccines, and industrial enzymes, as well as bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids. These successes underscore the versatility of PCC as a bioproduction platform. We then explore the role of synthetic biology in advancing PCC industrialization. Key developments include the creation of high-quality plant cell lines through genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9, enhancing genetic stability and metabolic efficiency. Additionally, synthetic biology has improved genetic transformation systems, overcoming a critical bottleneck in PCC. Enhanced expression systems, incorporating synthetic promoters and regulatory elements, have significantly boosted target compound yields. Furthermore, synthetic biology has expanded PCC applications by enabling the biosynthesis of heterologous compounds beyond their native metabolic pathways. Finally, we discuss future prospects, emphasizing the potential of synthetic biology to overcome current technical challenges. Emerging technologies such as multi-omics integration, machine learning, and synthetic organelle development are expected to further enhance PCC's scalability and efficiency. By addressing these challenges, synthetic biology will pave the way for large-scale plant cell cultivation, facilitating its widespread adoption in industrial bioproduction. The convergence of PCC and synthetic biology holds immense potential for sustainable, cost-effective, and scalable production of high-value compounds.

Key words: plant synthetic biology, plant cells, biosynthesis, natural product, genetic engineering

中图分类号:

颜钊涛, 周鹏飞, 汪阳忠, 张鑫, 谢雯燕, 田晨菲, 王勇. 植物合成生物学：植物细胞大规模培养的新机遇[J]. 合成生物学, DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095.

Zhaotao YAN, Pengfei ZHOU, Yangzhong WANG, Xin ZHANG, Wenyan XIE, Chenfei TIAN, Yong WANG. Plant synthetic biology: New opportunities for large-scale culture of Plant Cells[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095.

图/表 6

参考文献 127

1	MURTHY H N, LEE E J, PAEK K, 2014. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: strategies and approaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation[J/OL]. . DOI:10.1007/s11240-014-0467-7 .
2	NAGATA T, KUMAGAI F, 1999. Plant cell biology through the window of the highly synchronized tobacco BY-2 cell line[J].Methods in Cell Science, 1999, 21(2-3):123-127.DOI:10.1023/A:1009832822096 .
3	RAHMAN Z A, SEMAN Z A, OTHMAN A N, et al. 2021. Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration of Malaysian indicariceMR219 using anther culture[J/OL]. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 31: 101865. DOI:10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101865 .
4	LI Y L, HUANG S W, ZHANG J Y, et al. 2016. A protocol of homozygous haploid callus induction from endosperm of Taxus chinensis Rehd. var. mairei[J/OL]. SpringerPlus, 5(1): 659. DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-2320-4 .
5	OBAE S G, KLANDORF H, WEST T P, 2011. Growth characteristics and ginsenosides production of in vitro tissues of American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius L.[J/OL]. HortScience, 46(8): 1136-1140. DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.46.8.1136 .
6	LE V, SUKHIKH A, LARICHEV T, et al. 2023. Isolation of the Main Biologically Active Substances and Phytochemical Analysis of Ginkgo biloba Callus Culture Extracts[J/OL]. Molecules, 28(4): 1560. DOI:10.3390/molecules28041560 .
7	EIBL R, MEIER P, STUTZ I, et al. 2018. Plant cell culture technology in the cosmetics and food industries: current state and future trends[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102(20): 8661-8675. DOI:10.1007/s00253-018-9279-8 .
8	DABUWAR BENJAMIN E, ADAMU ISHAKU G, ANDREW PEINGURTA F, et al. 2019. Callus Culture for the Production of Therapeutic Compounds[J/OL]. American Journal of Plant Biology, 4(4): 76. DOI:10.11648/j.ajpb.20190404.14 .
9	NETT R S, LAU W, SATTELY E S, 2020. Discovery and engineering of colchicine alkaloid biosynthesis[J/OL]. Nature, 584(7819): 148-153. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2546-8 .
10	MAEDA H A, 2019. Harnessing evolutionary diversification of primary metabolism for plant synthetic biology[J/OL]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 294(45): 16549-16566. DOI:10.1074/jbc.REV119.006132 .
11	SCHMIDHALTER D R, MEYER H P, 2014. Industrial scale suspension culture of living cells[M/OL]. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9783527683321 .
12	DIRISALA V R, NAIR R R, SRIRAMA K, et al. 2017. Recombinant pharmaceutical protein production in plants: unraveling the therapeutic potential of molecular pharming[J/OL]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39(1): 18. DOI:10.1007/s11738-016-2315-3 .
13	B S S A A, B J E R, B D M C, et al. Next-generation metabolic engineering approaches towards development of plant cell suspension cultures as specialized metabolite producing biofactories[J].Biotechnology Advances, 2020, 45.DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107635 .
14	HUSSAIN Md S, FAREED S, ANSARI S, et al. 2012. Current approaches toward production of secondary plant metabolites[J/OL]. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences, 4(1): 10. DOI:10.4103/0975-7406.92725 .
15	RAMIREZ-ESTRADA K, VIDAL-LIMON H, HIDALGO D, et al. 2016. Elicitation, an Effective Strategy for the Biotechnological Production of Bioactive High-Added Value Compounds in Plant Cell Factories[J/OL]. Molecules, 21(2): 182. DOI:10.3390/molecules21020182 .
16	NAGEGOWDA D A, GUPTA P, 2020. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and metabolic engineering of plant specialized terpenoids[J/OL]. Plant Science, 294: 110457. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110457 .
17	FONSECA-SANTOS B, CORRÊA M A, CHORILLI M, 2015. Sustainability, natural and organic cosmetics: consumer, products, efficacy, toxicological and regulatory considerations[J/OL]. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 51(1): 17-26. DOI:10.1590/S1984-82502015000100002 .
18	GOMORD V, FAYE L, 2004. Posttranslational modification of therapeutic proteins in plants[J/OL]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7(2): 171-181. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.01.015 .
19	GHAG S B, ADKI V S, GANAPATHI T R, et al. 2021. Plant Platforms for Efficient Heterologous Protein Production[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 26(4): 546-567. DOI:10.1007/s12257-020-0374-1 .
20	SINGH A A, PILLAY P, TSEKOA T L, 2021. Engineering Approaches in Plant Molecular Farming for Global Health[J/OL]. Vaccines, 9(11): 1270. DOI:10.3390/vaccines9111270 .
21	WU J, ZHANG J, HAO X, et al. 2024. Establishment of an efficient callus transient transformation system for Vitis vinifera cv. 'Chardonnay'[J/OL]. Protoplasma, 261(2): 351-366. DOI:10.1007/s00709-023-01901-2 .
22	CORTESE E, CARRARETTO L, BALDAN B, et al. 2021. Arabidopsis Photosynthetic and Heterotrophic Cell Suspension Cultures [J].Methods in Molecular Biology,2021,2200167-185.
23	LI B, TAKAHASHI D, KAWAMURA Y, et al. 2020. Plasma membrane proteome analyses of Arabidopsis thaliana suspension-cultured cells during cold or ABA treatment: Relationship with freezing tolerance and growth phase[J/OL]. Journal of Proteomics, 211: 103528. DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103528 .
24	SEGEČOVÁ A, ČERVENÝ J, ROITSCH T, 2018. Advancement of the cultivation and upscaling of photoautotrophic suspension cultures using Chenopodium rubrum as a case study[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 135(1): 37-51. DOI:10.1007/s11240-018-1441-6 .
25	THORPE T A, 2007. History of plant tissue culture[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 37(2): 169-180. DOI:10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3 .
26	SRBA M, ČERNÍKOVÁ A, OPATRNÝ Z, 等, 2016. Practical guidelines for the characterization of tobacco BY-2 cell lines[J/OL]. Biologia plantarum, 60(1): 13-24. DOI:10.1007/s10535-015-0573-3 .
27	IKEDA N, KAMIMURA M, UESUGI K, 等, 2024. Choline chloride and N-allylglycine promote plant growth by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis[J/OL].
	Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 89(1): 51-61. DOI:10.1093/bbb/zbae145 .
28	LEE E K, JIN Y W, PARK J H, et al. 2010. Cultured cambial meristematic cells as a source of plant natural products[J/OL]. Nature Biotechnology, 28(11): 1213-1217. DOI:10.1038/nbt.1693 .
29	ZHOU P, LI H, LIN Y, et al. 2023. Omics analyses of Rehmannia glutinosa dedifferentiated and cambial meristematic cells reveal mechanisms of catalpol and indole alkaloid biosynthesis[J/OL]. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1): 463. DOI:10.1186/s12870-023-04478-3 .
30	PATRA N, SRIVASTAVA A K, 2016. Artemisinin production by plant hairy root cultures in gas- and liquid-phase bioreactors[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 35(1): 143-153. DOI:10.1007/s00299-015-1875-9 .
31	HA L T, PAWLICKI-JULLIAN N, PILLON-LEQUART M, et al. 2016. Hairy root cultures of Panax vietnamensis, a promising approach for the production of ocotillol-type ginsenosides[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 126(1): 93-103. DOI:10.1007/s11240-016-0980-y .
32	PERASSOLO M, CARDILLO A B, MUGAS M L, et al. 2017. Enhancement of anthraquinone production and release by combination of culture medium selection and methyl jasmonate elicitation in hairy root cultures of Rubia tinctorum [J/OL]. Industrial Crops and Products, 105: 124-132. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.010 .
33	GENGENBACH B B, KEIL L L, OPDENSTEINEN P, et al. 2019. Comparison of microbial and transient expression (tobacco plants and plant‐cell packs) for the production and purification of the anticancer mistletoe lectin viscumin[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 116(9): 2236-2249. DOI:10.1002/bit.27076 .
34	KIM T G, BAEK M Y, LEE E K, et al. 2008. Expression of human growth hormone in transgenic rice cell suspension culture[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 27(5): 885-891. DOI:10.1007/s00299-008-0514-0 .
35	KIM N S, YU H Y, CHUNG N D, et al. 2011. Production of functional recombinant bovine trypsin in transgenic rice cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. Protein Expression and Purification, 76(1): 121-126. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2010.10.007 .
36	NGUYEN T M, WU P Y, CHANG C H, et al. 2024. High-yield BMP2 expression in rice cells via CRISPR and endogenous αAmy3 promoter[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 108(1): 206. DOI:10.1007/s00253-024-13054-0 .
37	RATNER M, 2010. Genzyme resumes shipping as Sanofi-aventis hovers[J/OL]. Nature Biotechnology, 28(10): 994-994. DOI:10.1038/nbt1010-994c .
38	MIHALIAK C A, FANTON M J, MCMILLEN J K. Preparation of vaccine master cell lines using recombinant plant suspension cultures:US2006/041305[P].WO 2007055894A2[2024-12-14].DOI:US7964403 B2 .
39	HANANIA U, ARIEL T, TEKOAH Y, et al. 2017. Establishment of a tobacco BY2 cell line devoid of plant‐specific xylose and fucose as a platform for the production of biotherapeutic proteins[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(9): 1120-1129. DOI:10.1111/pbi.12702 .
40	JUNG J W, KIM N S, JANG S H, et al. 2016. Production and characterization of recombinant human acid α-glucosidase in transgenic rice cell suspension culture[J/OL]. Journal of Biotechnology, 226: 44-53. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.031 .
41	CHUNG N D, KIM N S, GIAP D V, et al. 2014. Production of functional human vascular endothelial growth factor165 in transgenic rice cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 63: 58-63. DOI:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.05.007 .
42	KIM T G, KIM M Y, TIEN N Q D, et al. 2014. Dengue Virus E Glycoprotein Production in Transgenic Rice Callus[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 56(12): 1069-1078. DOI:10.1007/s12033-014-9787-4 .
43	CHEN L, YANG X, LUO D, et al. 2016. Efficient Production of a Bioactive Bevacizumab Monoclonal Antibody Using the 2A Self-cleavage Peptide in Transgenic Rice Callus[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7[2024-12-14]. . DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01156 .
44	ZHANG N, WRIGHT T, CARAWAY P, et al. 2019. Enhanced secretion of human α1-antitrypsin expressed with a novel glycosylation module in tobacco BY-2 cell culture[J/OL]. Bioengineered, 10(1): 87-97. DOI:10.1080/21655979.2019.1604037 .
45	XU J, OKADA S, TAN L, et al. 2010. Human growth hormone expressed in tobacco cells as an arabinogalactan-protein fusion glycoprotein has a prolonged serum life[J/OL]. Transgenic Research, 19(5): 849-867. DOI:10.1007/s11248-010-9367-8 .
46	HUANG T K, MCDONALD K A, 2012. Bioreactor systems for in vitro production of foreign proteins using plant cell cultures[J/OL]. Biotechnology Advances, 30(2): 398-409. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.016 .
47	ALCALDE M A, PEREZ-MATAS E, ESCRICH A, et al. 2022. Biotic Elicitors in Adventitious and Hairy Root Cultures: A Review from 2010 to 2022[J/OL]. Molecules, 27(16): 5253. DOI:10.3390/molecules27165253 .
48	CHODISETTI B, RAO K, GANDI S, et al. 2013. Improved gymnemic acid production in the suspension cultures of Gymnema sylvestre through biotic elicitation[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 7(4): 519-525. DOI:10.1007/s11816-013-0290-3 .
49	LIANG C, CHEN C, ZHOU P, et al. 2018. Effect of Aspergillus flavus Fungal Elicitor on the Production of Terpenoid Indole Alkaloids in Catharanthus roseus Cambial Meristematic Cells[J/OL]. Molecules, 23(12): 3276. DOI:10.3390/molecules23123276 .
50	NAMDEO A, 2007. Plant cell elicitation for production of secondary metabolites: A review[J/OL]. .
51	SKOOG F, MILLER C O.Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro.[J].Cheminform, 1996, 27(21):118.DOI:10.1002/chin.199621020 .
52	EFFERTH T, 2019. Biotechnology Applications of Plant Callus Cultures[J/OL]. Engineering, 5(1): 50-59. DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.006 .
53	ZHANG Z, SUN Y, LI Y, 2020. Plant rejuvenation: from phenotypes to mechanisms[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 39(10): 1249-1262. DOI:10.1007/s00299-020-02577-1 .
54	TAKEDA T, MIZUKAMI M, MATSUOKA H, 2008. Characterization of two-step direct somatic embryogenesis in carrot [J/OL]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 38(2): 206-211. DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2007.07.006 .
55	LU Y, LIU Z, LYU M, et al. 2019. Characterization of JsWOX1 and JsWOX4 during Callus and Root Induction in the Shrub Species Jasminum sambac [J/OL]. Plants, 8(4): 79. DOI:10.3390/plants8040079 .
56	FENG M, ZHANG A, NGUYEN V, et al. 2024. A conserved graft formation process in Norway spruce and Arabidopsis identifies the PAT gene family as central regulators of wound healing[J/OL]. Nature Plants, 10(1): 53-65. DOI:10.1038/s41477-023-01568-w .
57	CAO H, ZHANG X, LI F, et al. 2024. Glucosinolate O-methyltransferase mediated callus formation and affected ROS homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana [J/OL]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 30(1): 109-121. DOI:10.1007/s12298-023-01409-2 .
58	SU Y H, TANG L P, ZHAO X Y, et al. 2021. Plant cell totipotency: Insights into cellular reprogramming[J/OL]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63(1): 228-243. DOI:10.1111/jipb.12972 .
59	XU C, CHANG P, GUO S, et al. 2023. Transcriptional activation by WRKY23 and derepression by removal of bHLH041 coordinately establish callus pluripotency in Arabidopsis regeneration[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 36(1): 158-173. DOI:10.1093/plcell/koad255 .
60	YANG W, ZHAI H, WU F, et al. 2024. Peptide REF1 is a local wound signal promoting plant regeneration[J/OL]. Cell, 187(12): 3024-3038.e14. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.040 .
61	张博,马永硕,尚轶,等.植物合成生物学研究进展[J].合成生物学, 2020, 1(2):20.DOI:10.12211/2096-8280.2020-016 .
	ZHANG B, MA Y S, SHANG Y, et al. Advances in plant synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology, 2020, 1(2):20.DOI:10.12211/2096-8280.2020-016 .
62	YOOSEFZADEH-NAJAFABADI M, TORABI S, TULPAN D, et al. 2021. Genome-Wide Association Studies of Soybean Yield-Related Hyperspectral Reflectance Bands Using Machine Learning-Mediated Data Integration Methods[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 777028. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.777028 .
63	RAMEZANPOUR M R, FARAJPOUR M, 2022. Application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm to predict and optimize greenhouse banana fruit yield through nitrogen, potassium and magnesium[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 17(2): e0264040. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264040 .
64	HESAMI M, ALIZADEH M, JONES A M P, et al. 2022. Machine learning: its challenges and opportunities in plant system biology[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 106(9-10): 3507-3530. DOI:10.1007/s00253-022-11963-6 .
65	JAFARI M, DANESHVAR M H, 2023. Prediction and optimization of indirect shoot regeneration of Passiflora caerulea using machine learning and optimization algorithms[J/OL]. BMC Biotechnology, 23(1): 27. DOI:10.1186/s12896-023-00796-4 .
66	FALLAH ZIARANI M, TOHIDFAR M, NAVVABI M, 2022. Modeling and optimizing in vitro percentage and speed callus induction of carrot via Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA and radial basis function[J/OL]. BMC Biotechnology, 22(1): 34. DOI:10.1186/s12896-022-00764-4 .
67	REZAEI H, MIRZAIE-ASL A, ABDOLLAHI M R, et al. 2023. Enhancing petunia tissue culture efficiency with machine learning: A pathway to improved callogenesis[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 18(11): e0293754. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293754 .
68	GRIGOREVA E I, SIDORCHUK Y V, DEINEKO E V, 2022. Aggregates' Formation in Higher Plants' Cell Culture: The Role of Cell Wall Components[J/OL]. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 12(S2): S182-S194. DOI:10.1134/S2079086422080023 .
69	KOLEWE M E, HENSON M A, ROBERTS S C, 2011. Analysis of aggregate size as a process variable affecting paclitaxel accumulation in Taxus suspension cultures[J/OL]. Biotechnology Progress, 27(5): 1365-1372. DOI:10.1002/btpr.655 .
70	PATIL R A, KOLEWE M E, ROBERTS S C, 2013. Cellular aggregation is a key parameter associated with long term variability in paclitaxel accumulation in Taxus suspension cultures[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 112(3): 303-310. DOI:10.1007/s11240-012-0237-3 .
71	NYON M P, DU L, TSENG C T K, et al. 2018. Engineering a stable CHO cell line for the expression of a MERS-coronavirus vaccine antigen[J/OL]. Vaccine, 36(14): 1853-1862. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.065 .
72	BISSINGER T, WU Y, MARICHAL‐GALLARDO P, et al. 2021. Towards integrated production of an influenza A vaccine candidate with MDCK suspension cells[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(10): 3996-4013. DOI:10.1002/bit.27876 .
73	SHEN C F, GUILBAULT C, LI X, et al. 2019. Development of suspension adapted Vero cell culture process technology for production of viral vaccines[J/OL]. Vaccine, 37(47): 6996-7002. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.003 .
74	LEE N, SHIN J, PARK J H, et al. 2016. Targeted Gene Deletion Using DNA-Free RNA-Guided Cas9 Nuclease Accelerates Adaptation of CHO Cells to Suspension Culture[J/OL]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 5(11): 1211-1219. DOI:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00249 .
75	MOHNEN D, 2008. Pectin structure and biosynthesis[J/OL]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11(3): 266-277. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.006 .
76	YEH B J, RUTIGLIANO R J, DEB A, et al. 2007. Rewiring cellular morphology pathways with synthetic guanine nucleotide exchange factors[J/OL]. Nature, 447(7144): 596-600. DOI:10.1038/nature05851 .
77	GLEBA Y Y, TUSÉ D, GIRITCH A, 2013. Plant Viral Vectors for Delivery by Agrobacterium [M/OL]//PALMER K, GLEBA Y. Plant Viral Vectors: 375. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 155-192 [2024-12-14]. . DOI:10.1007/82_2013_352 .
78	THIELE I, PALSSON B. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction[J]. Nature Protocols, 2010, 5(1):93-121.DOI:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 .
79	JIANG T, ZHANG Y, ZUO G, et al. 2024. Transcription factor PgNAC72 activates DAMMARENEDIOL SYNTHASE expression to promote ginseng saponin biosynthesis[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 195(4): 2952-2969. DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiae202 .
80	ZHAO Y, CHENG P, LIU Y, et al. 2024. A highly efficient soybean transformation system using GRF3-GIF1 chimeric protein[J/OL]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology: jipb.13767. DOI:10.1111/jipb.13767 .
81	JHA P, KUMAR V, 2018. BABY BOOM (BBM): a candidate transcription factor gene in plant biotechnology[J/OL]. Biotechnology Letters, 40(11-12): 1467-1475. DOI:10.1007/s10529-018-2613-5 .
82	LOWE K, WU E, WANG N, et al. 2016. Morphogenic Regulators Baby boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 28(9): 1998-2015. DOI:10.1105/tpc.16.00124 .
83	KOBERCOVÁ E, SRBA M, FISCHER L, 2023. Sulfadiazine and phosphinothricin selection systems optimised for the transformation of tobacco BY-2 cells[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 42(3): 535-548. DOI:10.1007/s00299-022-02975-7 .
84	HE Y, ZHANG T, SUN H, et al. 2020. A reporter for noninvasively monitoring gene expression and plant transformation[J/OL]. Horticulture Research, 7(1): 152. DOI:10.1038/s41438-020-00390-1 .
85	TIAN C, ZHANG Y, LI J, et al. 2022. Benchmarking Intrinsic Promoters and Terminators for Plant Synthetic Biology Research[J/OL]. BioDesign Research, 2022: 9834989. DOI:10.34133/2022/9834989 .
86	YAMASAKI S, SUZUKI A, YAMANO Y, et al. 2018. Identification of 5′-untranslated regions that function as effective translational enhancers in monocotyledonous plant cells using a novel method of genome-wide analysis[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology, 35(4): 365-373. DOI:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.18.0903a .
87	HUANG L F, TAN C C, YEH J F, et al. 2015. Efficient Secretion of Recombinant Proteins from RiceSuspension-Cultured Cells Modulated by the Choice of Signal Peptide[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 10(10): e0140812. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140812 .
88	WOJCIK S, KRIECHBAUMER V, 2021. Go your own way: membrane-targeting sequences[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 185(3): 608-618. DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiaa058 .
89	SELMA S, SANMARTÍN N, ESPINOSA‐RUIZ A, et al. 2022. Custom-made design of metabolite composition in N. benthamiana leaves using CRISPR activators[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20(8): 1578-1590. DOI:10.1111/pbi.13834 .
90	PEREZ‐MATAS E, HIDALGO‐MARTINEZ D, MOYANO E, et al. 2024. Overexpression of BAPT and DBTNBT genes in Taxus baccata in vitro cultures to enhance the biotechnological production of paclitaxel[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 22(1): 233-247. DOI:10.1111/pbi.14182 .
91	ZUO A, HE D, SUN C, et al. 2024. Integration of induction, system optimization and genetic transformation in Veratrum californicum var. vitro cultures to enhance the production of cyclopamine and veratramine[J/OL]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 216: 109087. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109087 .
92	CHU M, PEDREÑO M A, ALBURQUERQUE N, et al. 2017. A new strategy to enhance the biosynthesis of trans-resveratrol by overexpressing stilbene synthase gene in elicited Vitis vinifera cell cultures[J/OL]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 113: 141-148. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.02.006 .
93	LI J, MUTANDA I, WANG K, et al. 2019. Chloroplastic metabolic engineering coupled with isoprenoid pool enhancement for committed taxanes biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 10(1): 4850. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-12879-y .
94	SHI Y, WANG D, LI R, et al. 2021. Engineering yeast subcellular compartments for increased production of the lipophilic natural products ginsenosides[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 67: 104-111. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.06.002 .
95	KARLSON C K S, MOHD NOOR S N, KHALID N, et al. 2022. CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum[J/OL]. Biology, 11(8): 1127. DOI:10.3390/biology11081127 .
96	ZHANG W, ZHANG J, FAN Y, 等, 2024. RNA sequencing analysis reveals PgbHLH28 as the key regulator in response to methyl jasmonate-induced saponin accumulation in Platycodon grandiflorus[J/OL]. Horticulture Research, 11(5): uhae058. DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae058 .
97	KARPPINEN K, LAFFERTY D J, ALBERT N W, 等, 2021. MYBA and MYBPA transcription factors co‐regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in blue‐coloured berries[J/OL]. New Phytologist, 232(3): 1350-1367. DOI:10.1111/nph.17669 .
98	APPELHAGEN I, WULFF-VESTER A K, WENDELL M, et al. 2018. Colour bio-factories: Towards scale-up production of anthocyanins in plant cell cultures[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 48: 218-232. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.06.004 .
99	JIA E, LI H, HE F, et al. 2024. Metabolic engineering of artificially modified transcription factor SmMYB36-VP16 for high-level production of tanshinones and phenolic acids[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 86: 29-40. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2024.08.004 .
100	GE C, YU Z, SHENG H, et al. 2022. Redesigning regulatory components of quorum-sensing system for diverse metabolic control[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 13(1): 2182. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-29933-x .
101	WU J, BAO M, DUAN X, et al. 2020. Developing a pathway-independent and full-autonomous global resource allocation strategy to dynamically switching phenotypic states[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 11(1): 5521. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19432-2 .
102	KURZBACH E, STRIEKER M, WITTSTOCK U, 2022. Production of benzylglucosinolate in genetically engineered carrot suspension cultures[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology, 39(3): 241-250. DOI:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.0509a .
103	VASILEV N, SCHMITZ C, GRÖMPING U, et al. 2014. Assessment of Cultivation Factors that Affect Biomass and Geraniol Production in Transgenic Tobacco Cell Suspension Cultures[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 9(8): e104620. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0104620 .
104	CHUN J H, ADHIKARI P B, PARK S B, et al. 2015. Production of the dammarene sapogenin (protopanaxadiol) in transgenic tobacco plants and cultured cells by heterologous expression of PgDDS and CYP 716A47[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 34(9): 1551-1560. DOI:10.1007/s00299-015-1806-9 .
105	MURATA J, MATSUMOTO E, MORIMOTO K, et al. 2015. Generation of Triple-Transgenic Forsythia Cell Cultures as a Platform for the Efficient, Stable, and Sustainable Production of Lignans[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 10(12): e0144519. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144519 .
106	LU S, ZHANG Y, ZHU K, et al. 2018. The Citrus Transcription Factor CsMADS6 Modulates Carotenoid Metabolism by Directly Regulating Carotenogenic Genes[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 176(4): 2657-2676. DOI:10.1104/pp.17.01830 .
107	DONG Y, DUAN W, HE H, et al. 2015. Enhancing taxane biosynthesis in cell suspension culture of Taxus chinensis by overexpressing the neutral/alkaline invertase gene[J/OL]. Process Biochemistry, 50(4): 651-660. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2015.01.018 .
108	CHEE M J Y, LYCETT G W, KHOO T J, et al. 2017. Bioengineering of the Plant Culture of Capsicum frutescens with Vanillin Synthase Gene for the Production of Vanillin[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 59(1): 1-8. DOI:10.1007/s12033-016-9986-2 .
109	HUSAIN Z, WARSI Z I, KHAN S, et al. 2024. Metabolic engineering of hairy root cultures in Beta vulgaris for enhanced production of vanillin, 4acid-hydroxybenzoic, and vanillyl alcohol[J/OL]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12: 1435190. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1435190 .
110	MAYER M J, NARBAD A, PARR A J, et al. 2001. Rerouting the Plant Phenylpropanoid Pathway by Expression of a Novel Bacterial Enoyl-CoA Hydratase/Lyase Enzyme Function[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 13(7): 1669-1682. DOI:10.1105/TPC.010063 .
111	KITAOKA N, NOMURA T, OGITA S, et al. 2020. Bioproduction of glucose conjugates of 4-hydroxybenzoic and vanillic acids using bamboo cells transformed to express bacterial 4-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA hydratase/lyase[J/OL]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 130(1): 89-97. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.02.010 .
112	IMAMURA T, ISOZUMI N, HIGASHIMURA Y, et al. 2019. Isolation of amaranthin synthetase from Chenopodium quinoa and construction of an amaranthin production system using suspension-cultured tobacco BY-2 cells[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(5): 969-981. DOI:10.1111/pbi.13032 .
113	HAN J Y, WANG H Y, CHOI Y E, 2014. Production of dammarenediol-II triterpene in a cell suspension culture of transgenic tobacco[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 33(2): 225-233. DOI:10.1007/s00299-013-1523-1 .
114	SOBRINO-MENGUAL G, ALVAREZ D, TWYMAN R M, et al. 2024. Activation of the native PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1 promoter by modifying near-miss cis-acting elements induces carotenoid biosynthesis in embryogenic rice callus[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 43(5): 118. DOI:10.1007/s00299-024-03199-7 .
115	HIDALGO D, GEORGIEV M, MARCHEV A, et al. 2017. Tailoring tobacco hairy root metabolism for the production of stilbenes[J/OL]. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 17976. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-18330-w .
116	DEUS-NEUMANN B, ZENK M H, 1984. Instability of Indole Alkaloid Production in Catharanthus roseus Cell Suspension Cultures[J/OL]. Planta Medica, 50(5): 427-431. DOI:10.1055/s-2007-969755 .
117	ISHCHUK O P, DOMENZAIN I, SÁNCHEZ B J, et al. 2022. Genome-scale modeling drives 70-fold improvement of intracellular heme production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J/OL]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30): e2108245119. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2108245119 .
118	DE OLIVEIRA DAL'MOLIN C G, QUEK L E, PALFREYMAN R W, et al. 2010. AraGEM, a Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Primary Metabolic Network in Arabidopsis [J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 152(2): 579-589. DOI:10.1104/pp.109.148817 .
119	MURALI S, IBRAHIM M, RAJENDRAN H, 等, 2023. Genome-scale metabolic model led engineering of Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant cells for high camptothecin production[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1207218. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1207218 .
120	LAKSHMANAN M, LIM S H, MOHANTY B, 等, 2015. Unraveling the light-specific metabolic and regulatory signatures of rice through combined in silico modeling and multi-omics analysis[J/OL]. Plant Physiology: pp.01379.2015. DOI:10.1104/pp.15.01379 .
121	CHOWDHURY N B, SIMONS-SENFTLE M, DECOUARD B, et al. 2023. A multi-organ maize metabolic model connects temperature stress with energy production and reducing power generation[J/OL]. iScience, 26(12): 108400. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108400 .
122	YUAN H, CHEUNG C Y M, POOLMAN M G, et al. 2016. A genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its application to photorespiratory metabolism[J/OL]. The Plant Journal, 85(2): 289-304. DOI:10.1111/tpj.13075 .
123	CUNHA E, SILVA M, CHAVES I, et al. 2023. The first multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic model of a woody plant highlights suberin biosynthesis pathways in Quercus suber[J/OL]. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(9): e1011499. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011499 .
124	ARANO-VARELA H, FERNÁNDEZ F J, ESTRADA-ZÚÑIGA M E, et al. 2020. Verbascoside production in long-term Buddleja cordata Kunth cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. 3 Biotech, 10(6): 245. DOI:10.1007/s13205-020-02222-4 .
125	TREJO-TAPIA G, BALCAZAR-AGUILAR J B, MARTÍNEZ-BONFIL B, et al. 2008. Effect of screening and subculture on the production of betaxanthins in Beta vulgaris L. var. -'Dark Detroit'-callus culture[J/OL]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 9(1): 32-36. DOI:10.1016/j.ifset.2007.04.009 .
126	COPPEDE J S, PINA E S, PAZ T A, et al. 2014. Cell cultures of Maytenus-ilicifolia-Mart. are richer sources of quinone-methide triterpenoids than plant roots in natura[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 118(1): 33-43. DOI:10.1007/s11240-014-0459-7 .
127	ZHU X, MOHSIN A, ZAMAN W Q, et al. 2021. Development of a novel noninvasive quantitative method to monitor Siraitia grosvenorii cell growth and browning degree using an integrated computer-aided vision technology and machine learning[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(10): 4092-4104. DOI:10.1002/bit.27886 .

产品	物种	应用	制造商	参考
紫杉醇	Taxus chinensis L.	药物，抗癌	Phyton Biotech	https://phytonbiotech.com/about-pcf/
迷迭香酸	Melissa axillaris L.	药物，抗氧化	Aethera Biotech	https://www.aetherabiotech.it/en/
可可粉	Theobroma cacao L.	食品成分	California Cultured	https://www.cacultured.com/
黄烷醇	Theobroma cacao L	医药、保健品成分	AyanaBio	www.ayanabio.com
海茴香细胞提取物	Crithmum maritimum L.	化妆品成分，抗氧化	Ancelbio	http://ancelbio.cn/
火绒草细胞提取物	Leontopodium alpinum L.	化妆品成分，抗皱	Ancelbio	http://ancelbio.cn/
GBL-Skin¹	Glycyrrhiza uralensis L.	化妆品原料，乳化剂	Green Bioactives	https://greenbioactives.com/
白藜芦醇	Graptoveria amethorum L.	化妆品、保健品成分	Bioharvest Science	https://bioharvest.com/
Elelyso	Daucus carota L.	戈谢病治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
OPRX-100	Daucus carota L.	溃疡性结肠炎治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
PRX-102	Nicotiana tabacum L.	法布里病治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
新城疫病毒疫苗	Nicotiana tabacum L.	新城疫病毒疫苗	Dow AgroSciences	https://www.dow.com/
MOSS-FH	Physcomitrium patens L.	溶血性尿毒症综合征治疗性蛋白	Greenovation Biotech GmbH	http://www.greenovation.com/ developmental-pipeline.html

产品	物种	应用	制造商	参考
紫杉醇	Taxus chinensis L.	药物，抗癌	Phyton Biotech	https://phytonbiotech.com/about-pcf/
迷迭香酸	Melissa axillaris L.	药物，抗氧化	Aethera Biotech	https://www.aetherabiotech.it/en/
可可粉	Theobroma cacao L.	食品成分	California Cultured	https://www.cacultured.com/
黄烷醇	Theobroma cacao L	医药、保健品成分	AyanaBio	www.ayanabio.com
海茴香细胞提取物	Crithmum maritimum L.	化妆品成分，抗氧化	Ancelbio	http://ancelbio.cn/
火绒草细胞提取物	Leontopodium alpinum L.	化妆品成分，抗皱	Ancelbio	http://ancelbio.cn/
GBL-Skin¹	Glycyrrhiza uralensis L.	化妆品原料，乳化剂	Green Bioactives	https://greenbioactives.com/
白藜芦醇	Graptoveria amethorum L.	化妆品、保健品成分	Bioharvest Science	https://bioharvest.com/
Elelyso	Daucus carota L.	戈谢病治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
OPRX-100	Daucus carota L.	溃疡性结肠炎治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
PRX-102	Nicotiana tabacum L.	法布里病治疗性蛋白	Protalix BioThera	http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov
新城疫病毒疫苗	Nicotiana tabacum L.	新城疫病毒疫苗	Dow AgroSciences	https://www.dow.com/
MOSS-FH	Physcomitrium patens L.	溶血性尿毒症综合征治疗性蛋白	Greenovation Biotech GmbH	http://www.greenovation.com/ developmental-pipeline.html

植物物种	拉丁名	蛋白名称	细胞材料	产量	参考文献
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	人骨形态发生蛋白2（BMP2)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	21.5 μg/mL培养液	[36]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	人类生长激素（hGH)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	57 mg/L培养液	[34]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	合成牛胰蛋白酶原（Synthetic bovine trypsinogen)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	15 mg/L培养液	[35]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	酸性葡萄糖苷酶（GAA)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	37 mg/L培养液	[40]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	血管内皮生长因子（VEGFs）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	19 mg/L培养液	[41]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	包膜糖蛋白（Envelope glycoprotein）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	18.5 μg/g	[42]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	贝伐单抗（Bevacizumab monoclonal antibody）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	160.7–242.8 mg/kg	[43]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	人抗胰蛋白酶（Human α1-antitrypsin）	BY-2悬浮细胞	34.7 mg/L培养液	[44]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	人生长激素（Human growth hormone)	BY-2悬浮细胞	5.2%总可溶蛋白	[45]

植物物种	拉丁名	蛋白名称	细胞材料	产量	参考文献
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	人骨形态发生蛋白2（BMP2)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	21.5 μg/mL培养液	[36]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	人类生长激素（hGH)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	57 mg/L培养液	[34]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	合成牛胰蛋白酶原（Synthetic bovine trypsinogen)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	15 mg/L培养液	[35]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	酸性葡萄糖苷酶（GAA)	水稻愈伤组织细胞	37 mg/L培养液	[40]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	血管内皮生长因子（VEGFs）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	19 mg/L培养液	[41]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	包膜糖蛋白（Envelope glycoprotein）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	18.5 μg/g	[42]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	贝伐单抗（Bevacizumab monoclonal antibody）	水稻愈伤组织细胞	160.7–242.8 mg/kg	[43]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	人抗胰蛋白酶（Human α1-antitrypsin）	BY-2悬浮细胞	34.7 mg/L培养液	[44]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	人生长激素（Human growth hormone)	BY-2悬浮细胞	5.2%总可溶蛋白	[45]

物种	外植体部位	类型	激素	培养基及PH	周期	参考文献
水稻	胚乳	愈伤组织	1.0 mg/L 2,4-D； 1.0 mg/L 6BA	N6培养基	6个月	[3]
葡萄	叶片	愈伤组织	0.05 mg/L NAA； 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D； 2.0 mg/L KT	B5培养基	21天	[21]
胡萝卜	茎段	愈伤组织	0.5 mg/L 2,4-D	MS培养基	14天	[54]
红豆杉	胚乳	愈伤组织	1.0 mg/L 2,4-D； 0.5 mg/L 6BA	B5培养基	15天	[4]
人参	根部	愈伤组织	1.0 mg/L 2,4-D； 0.1 mg/L KT	MS培养基	90天	[5]
地黄	根部	形成层干细胞	2.0 mg/L NAA； 2.0 mg/L 6BA	MS培养基	14天	[29]

植物合成生物学：植物细胞大规模培养的新机遇

Plant synthetic biology: New opportunities for large-scale culture of Plant Cells

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 127

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

植物物种	拉丁名	改造策略	细胞材料	化合物类别	作用效果	参考文献
山葡萄	Vitis amurensis Rupr.	过表达VaCPK29	悬浮细胞	多酚类	白藜芦醇1.39 mg/L培养液	[106]
柑橘	CitrusreticulataL.	过表达CsMADS6、PSY、PDS和CCD1	愈伤组织细胞	类胡萝卜素	类胡萝卜素23 µg/g DW	[102]
加州藜芦	Veratrum californicum var.	过表达VnOSC1	愈伤组织细胞	生物碱	环巴胺6.14 mg/g DW	[91]
红豆杉	Taxus baccata L.	过表达NINV	悬浮细胞	二萜类	紫杉醇94 μg/g FW	[107]
红豆杉	Taxus baccata L.	过表达BAPT、DBTNBT	悬浮细胞	二萜类	紫杉醇310 mg/L培养液	[90]
灌木状辣椒	Capsicum frutescens L.	过表达VpVAN	悬浮细胞	芳香族化合物	香兰素 573.39±120.70 µg/g组织	[108]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达转录因子AmRos1和AmDel	BY-2悬浮细胞	黄酮类	花青素30 mg/g DW	[98]
甜菜	Beta vulgaris L.	过表达VpVAN	毛状根	芳香族化合物	香兰素0.0430 ±0.003 mg/g DW	[109]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达HCHL	悬浮细胞	黄酮类	花青素75.4±6.1 µmol/g FW	[110]
竹	Phyllostachys nigra L.	过表达PpHCH	悬浮细胞	酚类	4-羟基苯甲醇1.7 g/L培养液	[111]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达CqCYP76AD1、CqDODA、CqCDOPA5GT和CqAmaSy	BY-2悬浮细胞	苷类	苋菜苷13.67±4.13 µM；甜菜苷26.60±1.53 µM	[112]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达CqCYP76AD1-1和CqDODA-1	BY-2悬浮细胞	类黄酮	甜菜苷19.53±8.60 µM	[112]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达VoGES	悬浮细胞	单萜类	香叶醇16 µg/g DW	[103]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达PgDDS	悬浮细胞	三萜类	达玛烯二醇-II 573 µg/g DW	[113]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	过表达PgDDS 和 CYP716A47	悬浮细胞	三萜类	原人参二醇980.9 µg/g DW	[104]
烟草	Nicotiana tabacum L.	CRISPRi抑制NtC4H	悬浮细胞	苯丙素类	绿原酸1799.69 ng/mL培养液；乔松酮384.19 ng/mL培养液；柚皮素597.53 ng/mL培养液	[95]
水稻	Oryza sativa L.	修饰近靶顺式作用元件，激活PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1启动子	愈伤组织细胞	类胡萝卜素	八氢番茄红素7.13 µg/g DW	[114]
水飞蓟	Silybum marianum L.	过表达STS	悬浮细胞	多酚类	白藜芦醇50 ng/g FW	[115]
连翘	Forsythia koreana L.	过表达CYP81Q1；RNAi抑制UGT71A18和PLR	悬浮细胞	木质素	芝麻素10.83±0.35 µg/g DW	[105]

[1]	邵明威, 孙思勉, 杨时茂, 陈国强. 基于极端微生物的生物制造[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(6): 1419-1436.
[2]	竺方欢, 岑雪聪, 陈振. 微生物合成二元醇研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(6): 1367-1385.
[3]	刘益宁, 蒲伟, 杨金星, 王钰. ω-氨基酸与内酰胺的生物合成研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(6): 1350-1366.
[4]	李庚, 申晓林, 孙新晓, 王佳, 袁其朋. 过氧化物酶的重组表达和应用研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(6): 1498-1517.
[5]	郑皓天, 李朝风, 刘良叙, 王嘉伟, 李恒润, 倪俊. 负碳人工光合群落的设计、优化与应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 1189-1210.
[6]	程晓雷, 刘天罡, 陶慧. 萜类化合物的非常规生物合成研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 1050-1071.
[7]	程中玉, 李付琸. 基于P450选择性氧化的天然产物化学-酶法合成进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 960-980.
[8]	刘子健, 穆柏杨, 段志强, 王璇, 陆晓杰. 与核酸兼容的化学反应开发进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 1102-1124.
[9]	张守祺, 王涛, 孔尧, 邹家胜, 刘元宁, 徐正仁. 天然产物的化学-酶法合成：方法与策略的演进[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 913-940.
[10]	谢向前, 郭雯, 王欢, 李进. 含氨基乙烯半胱氨酸核糖体肽的生物合成与化学合成[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(5): 981-996.
[11]	汤志军, 胡友财, 刘文. 酶促4+2和2+2环加成反应：区域与立体选择性的理解与应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(3): 401-407.
[12]	张俊, 金诗雪, 云倩, 瞿旭东. 聚酮化合物非天然延伸单元的生物合成与结构改造应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(3): 561-570.
[13]	陈锡玮, 张华然, 邹懿. 真菌源非核糖体肽类药物生物合成及代谢工程[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(3): 571-592.
[14]	虞旭昶, 吴辉, 李雷. 文库构建与基因簇靶向筛选驱动的微生物天然产物高效发现[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(3): 492-506.
[15]	冯金, 潘海学, 唐功利. 近十年天然产物药物的生物合成研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(3): 408-446.