Synthetic Biology Journal ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (5): 556-569.DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2020-044
• Invited Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIA Siyang1,2(), JIANG Lihong1,2, CAI Jin1, HUANG Lei1, XU Zhinan1, LIAN Jiazhang1,2
Received:
2020-04-08
Revised:
2020-09-28
Online:
2020-12-03
Published:
2020-10-31
Contact:
CAI Jin, LIAN Jiazhang
夏思杨1,2(), 江丽红1,2, 蔡谨1, 黄磊1, 徐志南1, 连佳长1,2
通讯作者:
蔡谨,连佳长
作者简介:
作者简介:夏思杨(1996—),女,硕士研究生。研究方向为基因组进化研究。E-mail:21828174@zju.edu.cn基金资助:
CLC Number:
XIA Siyang, JIANG Lihong, CAI Jin, HUANG Lei, XU Zhinan, LIAN Jiazhang. Advances in genome evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2020, 1(5): 556-569.
夏思杨, 江丽红, 蔡谨, 黄磊, 徐志南, 连佳长. 酿酒酵母基因组进化的研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2020, 1(5): 556-569.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://synbioj.cip.com.cn/EN/10.12211/2096-8280.2020-044
Fig. 1 Major technologies for genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, including random genome evolution and trackable genome evolutiongTME—global transcription machinery engineering; SCRaMbLE—synthetic chromosome recombination and modification by LoxP-mediated evolution; YOGE—yeast oligo-mediated genome engineering; eMAGE—eukaryotic multiplex automated genome engineering; RAGE—RNAi-assisted genome evolution; CHAnGE—CRISPR/Cas9- and homology-directed-repair-assisted genome-scale engineering; MAGIC—multi-functional genome-wide CRISPR system; MAGESTIC—multiplexed accurate genome editing with short, trackable, integrated cellular barcodes; NGS—next-generation sequencing
技术名称 | 进化策略 | 技术特征 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|
gTME | 对转录复合体中的关 键转录元件定向进化 | 靶向反式作用因子,无需修饰靶基因座,在转录水平上产生全基因组规模的多样性;不易阐述其分子机制 | [ |
实验室适 应性进化 | 环境压力 | 不需要考虑错综复杂的代谢网络,只需根据目标设计相应的选择压力,适用广泛;多重突变的存在使得分析进化表型的分子机制难度较大 | [ |
逆向代谢工程 | 基于全基因组突变分 析构建酵母细胞工厂 | 全面、系统地确定优良突变菌株的基因型-表型关系,可去除不良突变来最大程度地减少进化弊端;瓶颈在于如何在大量随机突变中确定有益突变 | [ |
YOGE | 合成单链DNA库 | 酿酒酵母中首次由单链寡核苷酸介导重组的基因组工程;编辑效率低 | [ |
eMAGE | 合成单链DNA库 | 比YOGE更加精确和高效的单链寡核苷酸整合技术;靶序列需要紧密接近复制起点以及URA3标记的共同选择 | [ |
RAGE | 合成全基因组基因的 反向全长cDNA库 | 全长cDNA的表达可实现基因过表达,全长反义RNA的转录(RNAi)可实现基因下调;cDNA文库突变率有待进一步提高 | [ |
CHAnGE | 基于全基因组构建 gRNA和同源模板库 | 基于CRISPR/Cas9的同源修复实现全基因组进化,可利用独特的条形码实现可追踪的编辑;只有基因敲除单一功能调控 | [ |
MAGIC | 基于全基因组构建抑制、 激活和敲除的gRNA库 | 基于CRISPR/Cas9构建了最全面最多样化的酵母基因组文库,gRNA作为独特的基因条形码,可通过二代测序进行追踪;基因激活效率有待进一步提升 | [ |
MAGESTIC | 基于目标序列构建 gRNA和同源模板库 | 通过基因组条形码整合进行追踪,可对上百万个细胞进行高通量基因编辑;其在基因组进化的应用有待进一步验证 | [ |
Tab. 1 Genome evolution strategies for S. cerevisiae
技术名称 | 进化策略 | 技术特征 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|
gTME | 对转录复合体中的关 键转录元件定向进化 | 靶向反式作用因子,无需修饰靶基因座,在转录水平上产生全基因组规模的多样性;不易阐述其分子机制 | [ |
实验室适 应性进化 | 环境压力 | 不需要考虑错综复杂的代谢网络,只需根据目标设计相应的选择压力,适用广泛;多重突变的存在使得分析进化表型的分子机制难度较大 | [ |
逆向代谢工程 | 基于全基因组突变分 析构建酵母细胞工厂 | 全面、系统地确定优良突变菌株的基因型-表型关系,可去除不良突变来最大程度地减少进化弊端;瓶颈在于如何在大量随机突变中确定有益突变 | [ |
YOGE | 合成单链DNA库 | 酿酒酵母中首次由单链寡核苷酸介导重组的基因组工程;编辑效率低 | [ |
eMAGE | 合成单链DNA库 | 比YOGE更加精确和高效的单链寡核苷酸整合技术;靶序列需要紧密接近复制起点以及URA3标记的共同选择 | [ |
RAGE | 合成全基因组基因的 反向全长cDNA库 | 全长cDNA的表达可实现基因过表达,全长反义RNA的转录(RNAi)可实现基因下调;cDNA文库突变率有待进一步提高 | [ |
CHAnGE | 基于全基因组构建 gRNA和同源模板库 | 基于CRISPR/Cas9的同源修复实现全基因组进化,可利用独特的条形码实现可追踪的编辑;只有基因敲除单一功能调控 | [ |
MAGIC | 基于全基因组构建抑制、 激活和敲除的gRNA库 | 基于CRISPR/Cas9构建了最全面最多样化的酵母基因组文库,gRNA作为独特的基因条形码,可通过二代测序进行追踪;基因激活效率有待进一步提升 | [ |
MAGESTIC | 基于目标序列构建 gRNA和同源模板库 | 通过基因组条形码整合进行追踪,可对上百万个细胞进行高通量基因编辑;其在基因组进化的应用有待进一步验证 | [ |
Fig. 2 Scheme of automated RNAi-assisted genome evolution in yeast(a) RNAi mechanism in yeast. The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is digested by the endonuclease Dicer into short interference RNA (siRNA), which binds to the effector protein Argonaute to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The non-sense strand of siRNA binds to the target mRNA, leading to the degradation and interference of the transcription of the target gene. (b) Construction of a genome-wide modulation part library in the yeast strain with the reconstituted RNAi machinery. Full-length cDNA library was directionally cloned under the control of a constitutive promoter. The sense and anti-sense configurations resulted in genetic overexpression and knockdown, respectively. (c) RNAi-assisted multiplex genomic mutations in yeast. Gene modulation parts were flanked by homologous arms for iterative and multiplex δ integration into the repetitive genomic sequences. To enable efficient and selection-free δ integration, a Cas9 expression cassette was integrated into the RNAi harboring yeast strain
Fig. 3 MAGIC for genome-wide mapping genotype-phenotype relationships[34,42](a) Development of CRISPR-AID using three orthogonal CRISPR proteins, a nuclease-deficient CRISPR protein fused with an activation domain (dLbCpf1-VP) for CRISPRa, a nuclease-deficient mutant fused with a repression domain (dSpCas9-RD1152) for CRISPRi, and a catalytically active CRISPR protein (SaCas9) for CRISPRd. (b) Guide sequences for genome-wide activation (orange), interference (light blue), and deletion (magenta) were synthesized as arrayed oligos on DNA chip and cloned into the corresponding gRNA expression plasmids. The transformation of the pooled plasmid libraries into the CRISPR-AID integrated yeast strain resulted in the construction of the MAGIC library. The MAGIC library was subject to growth enrichment or high throughput screening, and the corresponding enrichment or depletion of guide sequences were profiled using next-generation sequencing. MAGIC can be employed to better understand and engineer complex phenotypes
Fig. 4 Construction of a recombinant yeast strain for simultaneous utilization of lignocellulosic carbons, such as cellobiose, xylose, and acetateXR—xylose reductase; XDH—xylitol dehydrogenase; ACS—acetyl-CoA synthetase; AADH—acetylating acetaldehyde dehydrogenase; ADH—alcohol dehydrogenase
Fig. 5 Construction of yeast cell factories for an efficient production of FFA[48](In wild-type yeast, the major carbon metabolism is to drive ethanol fermentation from glucose. In the fatty acid-overproducing yeast, metabolic engineering strategies were employed to establish efficient biosynthetic pathway from glucose to fatty acid. In the lipogenesis yeast, genome evolution was performed to completely reprogram the cellular metabolism from alcohol fermentation to fatty acid biosynthesis)PPP—pentose phosphate pathway; TCA—tricarboxylic acid; FFA—free fatty acid
1 | KERKHOVEN E J, LAHTVEE P J, NIELSEN J. Applications of computational modeling in metabolic engineering of yeast [J]. FEMS Yeast Research, 2014, 15(1): 12199. |
2 | GOFFEAU A, BARRELL B G, BUSSEY H, et al. Life with 6000 genes [J]. Science, 1996, 274(5287): 546, 563-567. |
3 | HONG Kuk-Ki, NIELSEN J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries [J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2012, 69(16): 2671-2690. |
4 | WANG Yajie, YU Xiaowei, ZHAO Huimin. Biosystems design by directed evolution [J]. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(3): e16716. |
5 | PATNAIK R. Engineering complex phenotypes in industrial strains [J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2008, 24(1): 38-47. |
6 | HASHIMOTO S, OGURA M, ARITOMI K, et al. Isolation of auxotrophic mutants of diploid industrial yeast strains after UV mutagenesis [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(1): 312-319. |
7 | ROUS C V, SNOW R, KUNKEE R E. Reduction of higher alcohols by fermentation with a leucine-auxotrophic mutant of wine yeast [J]. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 1983, 89(4): 274-278. |
8 | BIOT PELLETIER D, MARTIN V J. Evolutionary engineering by genome shuffling [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(9): 3877-3887. |
9 | ZHANG Yingxin, PERRY K, VINCI V A, et al. Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria [J]. Nature, 2002, 415(6872): 644-646. |
10 | SHI Dongjian, WANG Changlu, WANG Kuiming. Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2009, 36(1): 139-147. |
11 | ZHENG D Q, WU X C, WANG P M, et al. Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2011, 38(3): 415-422. |
12 | KUMAR A, SERINGHAUS M, BIERY M C, et al. Large-scale mutagenesis of the yeast genome using a Tn7-derived multipurpose transposon [J]. Genome Research, 2004, 14(10a): 1975-1986. |
13 | NI Haiying, LAPLAZA J M, JEFFRIES T W. Transposon mutagenesis to improve the growth of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae on D-xylose [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73(7): 2061-2066. |
14 | ALPER H, MOXLEY J, NEVOIGT E, et al. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production [J]. Science, 2006, 314(5805): 1565-1568. |
15 | NAGY A. Cre recombinase: the universal reagent for genome tailoring [J]. Genesis, 2000, 26(2): 99-109. |
16 | TURAN S, BODE J. Site-specific recombinases: from tag-and-target- to tag-and-exchange-based genomic modifications [J]. FASEB Journal, 2011, 25(12): 4088-4107. |
17 | DYMOND J S, RICHARDSON S M, COOMBES C E, et al. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design [J]. Nature, 2011, 477(7365): 471-476. |
18 | JIA Bin, WU Yi, LI Bingzhi, et al. Precise control of SCRaMbLE in synthetic haploid and diploid yeast [J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 1933. |
19 | Eun Joong OH, SKERKER J M, KIM Soo Rin, et al. Gene amplification on demand accelerates cellobiose utilization in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 82(12): 3631-3639. |
20 | KIM Soo Rin, SKERKER J M, KANG Wei, et al. Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2): e57048. |
21 | ENQUIST NEWMAN M, FAUST A M, BRAVO D D, et al. Efficient ethanol production from brown macroalgae sugars by a synthetic yeast platform [J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7482): 239-243. |
22 | VOORDECKERS K, KOMINEK J, DAS A, et al. Adaptation to high ethanol reveals complex evolutionary pathways [J]. PLoS Genetics, 2015, 11(11): e1005635. |
23 | GONZÁLEZ-RAMOS D, DE VRIES A R G, GRIJSEELS S S, et al. A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2016, 9: 173. |
24 | FLETCHER E, FEIZI A, BISSCHOPS M M, et al. Evolutionary engineering reveals divergent paths when yeast is adapted to different acidic environments [J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2017, 39: 19-28. |
25 | HACISALIHOĞLU B, HOLYAVKIN C, TOPALOĞLU A, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of a coniferyl aldehyde-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained by evolutionary engineering [J]. FEMS Yeast Research, 2019, 19(3): foz021. |
26 | CASPETA L, CHEN Yun, GHIACI P, et al. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant [J]. Science, 2014, 346(6205): 75-78. |
27 | OUD B, MARIS A J VAN, DARAN J M, et al. Genome-wide analytical approaches for reverse metabolic engineering of industrially relevant phenotypes in yeast [J]. FEMS Yeast Research, 2012, 12(2): 183-196. |
28 | HONG Min Eui, Ki Sung LEE, YU Byung Jo, et al. Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering [J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 149(1/2): 52-59. |
29 | DICARLO J E, CONLEY A J, PENTTILA M, et al. Yeast oligo-mediated genome engineering (YOGE) [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2013, 2(12): 741-749. |
30 | BARBIERI E M, MUIR P, AKHUETIE-ONI B O, et al. Precise editing at DNA replication forks enables multiplex genome engineering in eukaryotes [J]. Cell, 2017, 171(6): 1453-1467 |
31 | SI Tong, LUO Yunzi, BAO Zehua, et al. RNAi-assisted genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for complex phenotype engineering [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(3): 283-291. |
32 | SI Tong, CHAO Ran, MIN Yuhao, et al. Automated multiplex genome-scale engineering in yeast [J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 15187. |
33 | BAO Zehua, HAMEDIRAD M, XUE Pu, et al. Genome-scale engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with single-nucleotide precision [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(6): 505-508. |
34 | LIAN Jiazhang, SCHULTZ C, CAO Mingfeng, et al. Multi-functional genome-wide CRISPR system for high throughput genotype-phenotype mapping [J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 5794. |
35 | ROY K R, SMITH J D, VONESCH S C, et al. Multiplexed precision genome editing with trackable genomic barcodes in yeast [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(6): 512-520. |
36 | WANG H H, ISAACS F J, CARR P A, et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution [J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7257): 894-898. |
37 | PIJKEREN J P VAN, BRITTON R A. High efficiency recombineering in lactic acid bacteria [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(10): e76. |
38 | DRINNENBERG I A, WEINBERG D E, XIE K T, et al. RNAi in budding yeast [J]. Science, 2009, 326(5952): 544-550. |
39 | XIAO Han, ZHAO Huimin. Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals the E3 SUMO-protein ligase gene SIZ1 as a novel determinant of furfural tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2014, 7(1): 78. |
40 | BAO Zehua, XIAO Han, LIANG Jing, et al. Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(5): 585-594. |
41 | RUSSA M F LA, QI L S. The new state of the art: Cas9 for gene activation and repression [J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2015, 35(22): 3800-3809. |
42 | LIAN Jiazhang, HAMEDIRAD M, HU Sumeng, et al. Combinatorial metabolic engineering using an orthogonal tri-functional CRISPR system [J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 1688. |
43 | Suk Jin HA, GALAZKA J M, KIM Soo Rin, et al. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(2): 504-509. |
44 | WEI Na, QUARTERMAN J, KIM Soo Rin, et al. Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast [J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(1): 2580. |
45 | WEI Na, Eun Joong OH, MILLION G, et al. Simultaneous utilization of cellobiose, xylose, and acetic acid from lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production by an engineered yeast platform [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(6): 707-713. |
46 | REYES L H, GOMEZ J M, KAO K C. Improving carotenoids production in yeast via adaptive laboratory evolution [J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2014, 21: 26-33. |
47 | PATZSCHKE A, STEIGER M G, HOLZ C, et al. Enhanced glutathione production by evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains [J]. Biotechnology Journal, 2015, 10(11): 1719-1726. |
48 | YU Tao, ZHOU Yongjin J, HUANG Mingtao, et al. Reprogramming yeast metabolism from alcoholic fermentation to lipogenesis [J]. Cell, 2018, 174(6): 1549-1558 |
49 | ZHU Zhiwei, HU Yating, TEIXEIRA P G, et al. Multidimensional engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient synthesis of medium-chain fatty acids [J]. Nature Catalysis, 2020, 3(1): 64-74. |
50 | WANG Yanfeng, ZHANG Shuxian, LIU Huaqing, et al. Changes and roles of membrane compositions in the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol [J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2015, 55(12): 1417-1426. |
51 | SNOEK T, PICCA NICOLINO M, BREMT S VAN DEN, et al. Large-scale robot-assisted genome shuffling yields industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts with increased ethanol tolerance [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015, 8(1): 32. |
52 | LING Hua, JUWONO N K P, Wei Suong TEO, et al. Engineering transcription factors to improve tolerance against alkane biofuels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015, 8(1): 231. |
53 | BRENNAN T C, WILLIAMS T C, SCHULZ B L, et al. Evolutionary engineering improves tolerance for replacement jet fuels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81(10): 3316-3325. |
54 | BRACHER J M, DE HULSTER E, KOSTER C C, et al. Laboratory evolution of a biotin-requiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for full biotin prototrophy and identification of causal mutations [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2017, 83(16): e00892-00817. |
55 | LI Sijin, SI Tong, WANG Meng, et al. Development of a synthetic malonyl-CoA Sensor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for intracellular metabolite monitoring and genetic screening [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(12): 1308-1315. |
56 | WANG Meng, LI Sijin, ZHAO Huimin. Design and engineering of intracellular-metabolite-sensing/regulation gene circuits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113(1): 206-215. |
57 | MUKHERJEE K, BHATTACHARYYA S, PERALTA-YAHYA P. GPCR-based chemical biosensors for medium-chain fatty acids [J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(12): 1261-1269. |
58 | KIM Hee-Jung, Sura HA, Hee Yoon LEE, et al. ROSics: chemistry and proteomics of cysteine modifications in redox biology [J]. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 2015, 34(2): 184-208. |
59 | LEAVITT J M, WAGNER J M, TU C C, et al. Biosensor-enabled directed evolution to improve muconic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 12(10): 1600687. |
60 | MAIR P, GIELEN F, HOLLFELDER F. Exploring sequence space in search of functional enzymes using microfluidic droplets [J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2017, 37: 137-144. |
61 | CHEN B, Sungwon LIM, KANNAN A, et al. High-throughput analysis and protein engineering using microcapillary arrays [J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2016, 12(2): 76-81. |
62 | LARSEN A C, DUNN M R, HATCH A, et al. A general strategy for expanding polymerase function by droplet microfluidics [J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 11235. |
63 | DORR M, FIBINGER M P, LAST D, et al. Fully automatized high-throughput enzyme library screening using a robotic platform [J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113(7): 1421-1432. |
[1] | WU Yujie, LIU Xinxin, LIU Jianhui, Yang Kaiguang, SUI Zhigang, ZHANG Lihua, ZHANG Yukui. Research progress of strain screening and quantitative analysis of key molecules based on high-throughput liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 1000-1019. |
[2] | GAO Xianyun, NIU Lingxue, JIAN Ni, GUAN Ningzi. Applications of microbial synthetic biology in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(2): 263-282. |
[3] | PAN Yingjia, XIA Siyang, DONG Chang, CAI Jin, LIAN Jiazhang. Mutator-driven continuous genome evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(1): 225-240. |
[4] | REN Shichao, SUN Qiuyan, FENG Xudong, LI Chun. Biosynthesis of pentacyclic triterpenoid saponins in microbial cell factories [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(1): 168-183. |
[5] | CHEN Jiuzhou, WANG Yu, PU Wei, ZHENG Ping, SUN Jibin. Advances and perspective on bioproduction of 5-aminolevulinic acid [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2021, 2(6): 1000-1016. |
[6] | LI Xiaodong, YANG Chengshuai, WANG Pingping, YAN Xing, ZHOU Zhihua. Production of sesquiterpenoids α-neoclovene and β-caryophyllene by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2021, 2(5): 792-803. |
[7] | SUN Wentao, ZHANG Xinzhe, WAN Shengtong, WANG Ruwen, LI Chun. Regulation on oxidation selectivity for β-amyrin by Class Ⅱ cytochrome P450 enzymes [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2021, 2(5): 804-814. |
[8] | XU Peng. In memory of Prof. Daniel I.C. Wang: Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for the production of plant-based lipids: technical constraints and perspectives for a sustainable cellular agriculture economy [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2021, 2(4): 509-527. |
[9] | LI Yi, LIN Zhenquan, LIU Zihe. Advances in yeast based adaptive laboratory evolution [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2021, 2(2): 287-301. |
[10] | SHENG Yue, ZHANG Genlin. Yeast terminator engineering: from mechanism exploration to artificial design [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2020, 1(6): 709-721. |
[11] | Ke XU, Jingnan WANG, Chun LI. Intelligent microbial cell factory with tolerance for green biological manufacturing [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2020, 1(4): 427-439. |
[12] | Shuobo SHI, Qiongyu MENG, Weibo QIAO, Huimin ZHAO. Establishing carbon dioxide-based third-generation biorefinery for a sustainable low-carbon economy [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2020, 1(1): 44-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||