Synthetic Biology Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4): 638-657.DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2022-032
• Invited Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jingjing LI1, Chao MA2, Fan WANG1, Hongjie ZHANG1,2, Kai LIU1,2
Received:
2022-06-01
Revised:
2022-07-18
Online:
2022-09-08
Published:
2022-08-31
Contact:
Kai LIU
李敬敬1, 马超2, 王帆1, 张洪杰1,2, 刘凯1,2
通讯作者:
刘凯
作者简介:
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jingjing LI, Chao MA, Fan WANG, Hongjie ZHANG, Kai LIU. Biosynthesis of high-performance protein materials and their applications[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(4): 638-657.
李敬敬, 马超, 王帆, 张洪杰, 刘凯. 生物合成高性能蛋白及材料应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(4): 638-657.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://synbioj.cip.com.cn/EN/10.12211/2096-8280.2022-032
Fig. 3 Non-covalent interactions-mediated assembly of the recombinant structural proteins(a) Protein self-assembly induced by both C-terminal domain and internal actions among secondary structural elements[71]; (b) Composite assembly of recombinant structural proteins and DNA molecules[61]; (c~d) Composite assembly of supercharged recombinant structural proteins and surfactant molecules[72-73]
序号 | 蛋白 | 氨基酸序列 | 修饰方法 | 材料性能 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 蓑衣虫丝蛋白 | (A) n -(GA) n -Linker-(GAGAGS) n | 天然蛋白 | 拉伸强度2.0 GPa,韧性364 MJ/m3 | [ |
2 | 重组鱿鱼环齿蛋白 | (PAATAVSHTTHHAP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 不同折叠结构的基序重组 | 拉伸强度650 MPa,韧性120 MJ/m3 | [ |
3 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | [(GGX) n FGAILSS]128 | 不同折叠结构的基序重组与多聚化 | 拉伸强度0.98 GPa,韧性161 MJ/m3 | [ |
4 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | [An(GGX) n ]192 | 蛋白共价组装 | 拉伸强度1.03 GPa,韧性114 MJ/m3 | [ |
5 | 重组节肢弹性蛋白 | (VGSGGRPSDSYGAPGGGNP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-海藻酸盐复合 | 拉伸强度768 MPa,模量24 MPa, 韧性52 MJ/m3 | [ |
重组鱿鱼环齿蛋白 | (PAATAVSHTTHHAP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 拉伸强度606 MPa,韧性69 MJ/m3 | |||
6 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | NTD-[A n (GGX) n ]-CTD | 蛋白非共价组装 | 拉伸强度834 MPa,韧性143 MJ/m3 | [ |
7 | 重组节肢弹性蛋白 | (VGSGGRPSDSYGAPGGGNP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-DNA复合 | 韧性250 MJ/m3 | [ |
8 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [(VPGVG)20pAzF]4 | 非天然氨基酸定点修饰 | 光交联反应活性 | [ |
9 | 重组贻贝足丝蛋白 | Mfp5-CsgA | 不同生物功能的基序进行重组 | 水下黏合性能20.9 mJ/m2 | [ |
10 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂复合 | 黏合性能16.5 MPa | [ |
11 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂-金属离子复合 | 黏合性能16 MPa | [ |
12 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂-Au复合 | 黏合性能20 MPa | [ |
Tab. 1 Properties of high-performance protein fibers and adhesives
序号 | 蛋白 | 氨基酸序列 | 修饰方法 | 材料性能 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 蓑衣虫丝蛋白 | (A) n -(GA) n -Linker-(GAGAGS) n | 天然蛋白 | 拉伸强度2.0 GPa,韧性364 MJ/m3 | [ |
2 | 重组鱿鱼环齿蛋白 | (PAATAVSHTTHHAP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 不同折叠结构的基序重组 | 拉伸强度650 MPa,韧性120 MJ/m3 | [ |
3 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | [(GGX) n FGAILSS]128 | 不同折叠结构的基序重组与多聚化 | 拉伸强度0.98 GPa,韧性161 MJ/m3 | [ |
4 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | [An(GGX) n ]192 | 蛋白共价组装 | 拉伸强度1.03 GPa,韧性114 MJ/m3 | [ |
5 | 重组节肢弹性蛋白 | (VGSGGRPSDSYGAPGGGNP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-海藻酸盐复合 | 拉伸强度768 MPa,模量24 MPa, 韧性52 MJ/m3 | [ |
重组鱿鱼环齿蛋白 | (PAATAVSHTTHHAP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 拉伸强度606 MPa,韧性69 MJ/m3 | |||
6 | 重组蛛丝蛋白 | NTD-[A n (GGX) n ]-CTD | 蛋白非共价组装 | 拉伸强度834 MPa,韧性143 MJ/m3 | [ |
7 | 重组节肢弹性蛋白 | (VGSGGRPSDSYGAPGGGNP) [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-DNA复合 | 韧性250 MJ/m3 | [ |
8 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [(VPGVG)20pAzF]4 | 非天然氨基酸定点修饰 | 光交联反应活性 | [ |
9 | 重组贻贝足丝蛋白 | Mfp5-CsgA | 不同生物功能的基序进行重组 | 水下黏合性能20.9 mJ/m2 | [ |
10 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂复合 | 黏合性能16.5 MPa | [ |
11 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂-金属离子复合 | 黏合性能16 MPa | [ |
12 | 重组类弹性蛋白 | [VPGVG(VPGKG) n ] | 蛋白-表面活性剂-Au复合 | 黏合性能20 MPa | [ |
Fig. 6 Applications of high-performance protein adhesives in vivo(a~b) Supercharged ELPs-based adhesive and the applications in hemostasis and wound repair[72-73]; (c) Fabrication of the engineered protein adhesive as a conjoined network and applications in cartilage repair[115]; (d) Fabrication of protein photothermal bioplaster (protein-SDBS-GNRs) and non-invasive skin tumor therapy[88]
1 | WEI J J, XU L J, WU W H, et al. Genetically engineered materials: proteins and beyond[J]. Science China Chemistry, 2022, 65(3): 486-496. |
2 | HEIM M, KEERL D, SCHEIBEL T. Spider silk: from soluble protein to extraordinary fiber[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(20): 3584-3596. |
3 | MARELLI B, PATEL N, DUGGAN T, et al. Programming function into mechanical forms by directed assembly of silk bulk materials[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(3): 451-456. |
4 | SUN J, SU J J, MA C, et al. Fabrication and mechanical properties of engineered protein-based adhesives and fibers[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(6): e1906360. |
5 | 杨兆颖, 张帆, 郭建文, 等. 类弹性蛋白多肽的生物合成及其药物递送应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(4): 728-747. |
YANG Zhaoying, ZHANG Fan, GUO Jianwen, et al. Biosynthesis of elastin-like polypeptides and their applications in drug delivery[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(4): 728-747. | |
6 | 王宇翔, 吴夏泠, 张文彬. 生物活体功能材料研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(4): 621-625. |
WANG Yuxiang, WU Xialing, ZHANG Wenbin. Current advance in engineered living materials[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(4): 621-625. | |
7 | QIAN Z G, PAN F, XIA X X. Synthetic biology for protein-based materials[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2020, 65: 197-204. |
8 | HUANG W W, LING S J, LI C M, et al. Silkworm silk-based materials and devices generated using bio-nanotechnology[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2018, 47(17): 6486-6504. |
9 | SIONKOWSKA A. Collagen blended with natural polymers: recent advances and trends[J]. Progress in Polymer Science, 2021, 122: 101452. |
10 | BESSA P C, BALMAYOR E R, HARTINGER J, et al. Silk fibroin microparticles as carriers for delivery of human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2: in vitro and in vivo bioactivity[J]. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 2010, 16(5): 937-945. |
11 | MACEWAN S R, CHILKOTI A. Elastin-like polypeptides: biomedical applications of tunable biopolymers[J]. Biopolymers, 2010, 94(1): 60-77. |
12 | CHANG R, ZOU Q L, XING R R, et al. Peptide-based supramolecular nanodrugs as a new generation of therapeutic toolboxes against cancer[J]. Advanced Therapeutics, 2019, 2(8): 1900048. |
13 | LÜ S S, DUDEK D M, CAO Y, et al. Designed biomaterials to mimic the mechanical properties of muscles[J]. Nature, 2010, 465(7294): 69-73. |
14 | ZHANG J S, WONG S H D, WU X, et al. Engineering photoresponsive ligand tethers for mechanical regulation of stem cells[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(48): 2105765. |
15 | SUN H C, ZHANG X Y, MIAO L, et al. Micelle-induced self-assembling protein nanowires: versatile supramolecular scaffolds for designing the light-harvesting system[J]. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(1): 421-428. |
16 | EDLUND A M, JONES J, LEWIS R, et al. Economic feasibility and environmental impact of synthetic spider silk production from Escherichia coli [J]. New Biotechnology, 2018, 42: 12-18. |
17 | PREIS I, ABRAMSON M, SHOSEYOV O. The modification of cell wall properties by expression of recombinant resilin in transgenic plants[J]. Molecular Biotechnology, 2018, 60(4): 310-318. |
18 | WHITTALL D R, BAKER K V, BREITLING R, et al. Host systems for the production of recombinant spider silk[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2021, 39(6): 560-573. |
19 | ZHANG J S, LEI H, QIN M, et al. Quantifying cation-π interactions in marine adhesive proteins using single-molecule force spectroscopy[J]. Supramolecular Materials, 2022, 1: 100005. |
20 | GUERETTE P A, HOON S, SEOW Y, et al. Accelerating the design of biomimetic materials by integrating RNA-seq with proteomics and materials science[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(10): 908-915. |
21 | KONO N, NAKAMURA H, OHTOSHI R, et al. The bagworm genome reveals a unique fibroin gene that provides high tensile strength[J]. Communications Biology, 2019, 2: 148. |
22 | AGNARSSON I, KUNTNER M, BLACKLEDGE T A. Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(9): e11234. |
23 | YOSHIOKA T, TSUBOTA T, TASHIRO K, et al. A study of the extraordinarily strong and tough silk produced by bagworms[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 1469. |
24 | KONO N, NAKAMURA H, TATEISHI A, et al. The balance of crystalline and amorphous regions in the fibroin structure underpins the tensile strength of bagworm silk[J]. Zoological Letters, 2021, 7(1): 11. |
25 | KONO N, NAKAMURA H, MORI M, et al. Multicomponent nature underlies the extraordinary mechanical properties of spider dragline silk[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(31): e2107065118. |
26 | AMIRAM M, HAIMOVICH A D, FAN C G, et al. Evolution of translation machinery in recoded bacteria enables multi-site incorporation of nonstandard amino acids[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33(12): 1272-1279. |
27 | COSTA S A, SIMON J R, AMIRAM M, et al. Photo-crosslinkable unnatural amino acids enable facile synthesis of thermoresponsive nano- to microgels of intrinsically disordered polypeptides[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(5): 1704878. |
28 | YANG B, AYYADURAI N, YUN H, et al. In vivo residue-specific DOPA-incorporated engineered mussel bioglue with enhanced adhesion and water resistance[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(49): 13360-13364. |
29 | LIN S C, RYU S, TOKAREVA O, et al. Predictive modelling-based design and experiments for synthesis and spinning of bioinspired silk fibres[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6892. |
30 | HEIDEBRECHT A, EISOLDT L, DIEHL J, et al. Biomimetic fibers made of recombinant spidroins with the same toughness as natural spider silk[J]. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(13): 2189-2194. |
31 | ZHONG C, GURRY T, CHENG A A, et al. Strong underwater adhesives made by self-assembling multi-protein nanofibres[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2014, 9(10): 858-866. |
32 | CUI M K, WANG X Y, AN B L, et al. Exploiting mammalian low-complexity domains for liquid-liquid phase separation-driven underwater adhesive coatings[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(8): eaax3155. |
33 | MA C, DONG J J, VIVIANI M, et al. De novo rational design of a freestanding, supercharged polypeptide, proton-conducting membrane[J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(29): eabc0810. |
34 | LI Yuanxin, LI Jingjing, SUN Jing, et al. Bioinspired and mechanically strong fibers based on engineered non-spider chimeric proteins[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(21): 8148-8152. |
35 | LI J Y, ZHU Y G, YU H, et al. Microbially synthesized polymeric amyloid fiber promotes β-nanocrystal formation and displays gigapascal tensile strength[J]. ACS Nano, 2021, 15(7): 11843-11853. |
36 | HUANG P S, BOYKEN S E, BAKER D. The coming of age of de novo protein design[J]. Nature, 2016, 537(7620): 320-327. |
37 | KING N P, SHEFFLER W, SAWAYA M R, et al. Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6085): 1171-1174. |
38 | KING N P, BALE J B, SHEFFLER W, et al. Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials[J]. Nature, 2014, 510(7503): 103-108. |
39 | HSIA Y, BALE J B, GONEN S,et al. Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein icosahedron[J]. Nature, 2016, 535: 136-139. |
40 | BALE J B, GONEN S, LIU Y X, et al. Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes[J]. Science, 2016, 353(6297): 389-394. |
41 | DOU J Y, VOROBIEVA A A, SHEFFLER W, et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel[J]. Nature, 2018, 561(7724): 485-491. |
42 | SILVA D A, YU S, ULGE U Y, et al. De novo design of potent and selective mimics of IL-2 and IL-15[J]. Nature, 2019, 565(7738): 186-191. |
43 | SHEN H, FALLAS J A, LYNCH E, et al. De novo design of self-assembling helical protein filaments[J]. Science, 2018, 362(6415): 705-709. |
44 | JUMPER J, EVANS R, PRITZEL A, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold[J]. Nature, 2021, 596(7873): 583-589. |
45 | TUNYASUVUNAKOOL K, ADLER J, WU Z, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome[J]. Nature, 2021, 596(7873): 590-596. |
46 | SU J J, ZHAO K L, REN Y B, et al. Biosynthetic structural proteins with super plasticity, extraordinary mechanical performance, biodegradability, biocompatibility and information storage ability[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2022, 61(12): e202117538. |
47 | XIA X X, QIAN Z G, KI C S, et al. Native-sized recombinant spider silk protein produced in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli results in a strong fiber[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(32): 14059-14063. |
48 | JIN Q, PAN F, HU C F, et al. Secretory production of spider silk proteins in metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum for spinning into tough fibers[J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2022, 70: 102-114. |
49 | WANG T M, GUAN C G, GUO J H, et al. Pooled CRISPR interference screening enables genome-scale functional genomics study in bacteria with superior performance[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 2475. |
50 | LI Lei, WEI Keke, ZHENG Guosong, et al. CRISPR-Cpf1-assisted multiplex genome editing and transcriptional repression in Streptomyces [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 84(18): e00827. |
51 | BRYSON D I, FAN C G, GUO L T, et al. Continuous directed evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2017, 13(12): 1253-1260. |
52 | WANG T N, BADRAN A H, HUANG T P, et al. Continuous directed evolution of proteins with improved soluble expression[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2018, 14(10): 972-980. |
53 | THURONYI B W, KOBLAN L W, LEVY J M, et al. Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(9): 1070-1079. |
54 | JOHNSTON C W, BADRAN A H, COLLINS J J. Continuous bioactivity-dependent evolution of an antibiotic biosynthetic pathway[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 4202. |
55 | MORRISON M S, WANG T N, RAGURAM A, et al. Disulfide-compatible phage-assisted continuous evolution in the periplasmic space[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 5959. |
56 | KOLBER N S, FATTAL R, BRATULIC S, et al. Orthogonal translation enables heterologous ribosome engineering in E. coli [J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 599. |
57 | ZHANG J T, ZHOU K, WANG Q B. Tailoring the self-assembly behaviors of recombinant tobacco mosaic virus by rationally introducing covalent bonding at the protein-protein interface[J]. Small, 2016, 12(36): 4955-4959. |
58 | ZHOU K, ZHOU Y H, YANG H C, et al. Interfacially bridging covalent network yields hyperstable and ultralong virus-based fibers for engineering functional materials[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(41): 18249-18255. |
59 | BOWEN C H, DAI B, SARGENT C J, et al. Recombinant spidroins fully replicate primary mechanical properties of natural spider silk[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2018, 19(9): 3853-3860. |
60 | BOWEN C H, SARGENT C J, WANG A, et al. Microbial production of megadalton titin yields fibers with advantageous mechanical properties[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 5182. |
61 | SU J J, LIU B M, HE H N, et al. Engineering high strength and super-toughness of unfolded structural proteins and their extraordinary anti-adhesion performance for abdominal hernia repair[J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(19): 2200842. |
62 | ZHAO Lai, LI Jingjing, ZHANG Lili, et al. Biosynthetic protein and nanocellulose composite fibers with extraordinary mechanical performance[J]. Nanotoday, 2022, 44: 101485. |
63 | WAN S K, CHENG W H, LI J J, et al. Biological composite fibers with extraordinary mechanical strength and toughness mediated by multiple intermolecular interacting networks[J/OL]. Nano Research, 2022. . |
64 | HE H N, YANG C J, WANG F, et al. Mechanically strong globular-protein-based fibers obtained using a microfluidic spinning technique[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(11): 4344-4348. |
65 | MOZHDEHI D, LUGINBUHL K M, SIMON J R, et al. Genetically encoded lipid-polypeptide hybrid biomaterials that exhibit temperature-triggered hierarchical self-assembly[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2018, 10(5): 496-505. |
66 | LUGINBUHL K M, MOZHDEHI D, DZURICKY M, et al. Recombinant synthesis of hybrid lipid-peptide polymer fusions that self-assemble and encapsulate hydrophobic drugs[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(45): 13979-13984. |
67 | ZAKERI B, FIERER J O, CELIK E, et al. Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(12): E690-E697. |
68 | WANG R, YANG Z G, LUO J R, et al. B12-dependent photoresponsive protein hydrogels for controlled stem cell/protein release[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(23): 5912-5917. |
69 | 易琪昆, 孙晨博, 杨中光, 等. 可基因编码点击化学在材料合成生物学中的应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(4): 690-708. |
YI Q K, SUN C B, YANG Z G, et al. Genetically encoded click chemistry, an enabling tool for materials synthetic biology[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(4): 690-708. | |
70 | LI L L, QIAO S L, LIU W J, et al. Intracellular construction of topology-controlled polypeptide nanostructures with diverse biological functions[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 1276. |
71 | SARIC M, EISOLDT L, DÖRING V, et al. Interplay of different major ampullate spidroins during assembly and implications for fiber mechanics[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(9): 2006499. |
72 | MA Chao, SUN Jing, LI Bo, et al. Ultra-strong bio-glue from genetically engineered polypeptides[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 3613. |
73 | SUN Jing, XIAO Lingling, LI Bo, et al. Genetically engineered polypeptide adhesive coacervates for surgical applications[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(44): 23687-23694. |
74 | YAN X H, ZHU P L, FEI J B, et al. Self-assembly of peptide-inorganic hybrid spheres for adaptive encapsulation of guests[J]. Advanced Materials, 2010, 22(11): 1283-1287. |
75 | LIU Y N, JIN J Y, DENG H P, et al. Protein-framed multi-porphyrin micelles for a hybrid natural-artificial light-harvesting nanosystem[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(28): 7952-7957. |
76 | YANG G, ZHANG X, KOCHOVSKI Z, et al. Precise and reversible protein-microtubule-like structure with helicity driven by dual supramolecular interactions[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(6): 1932-1937. |
77 | ZHANG Lei, MA Chao, SUN Jing, et al. Genetically engineered supercharged polypeptide fluids: fast and persistent self-ordering induced by touch[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(23): 6878-6882. |
78 | LIU K, PESCE D, MA C, et al. Solvent-free liquid crystals and liquids based on genetically engineered supercharged polypeptides with high elasticity[J]. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(15): 2459-2465. |
79 | MA C, SU J J, LI B, et al. Solvent-free plasticity and programmable mechanical behaviors of engineered proteins[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(10): 1907697. |
80 | SUN J, LI B, WANG F, et al. Proteinaceous fibers with outstanding mechanical properties manipulated by supramolecular interactions[J]. CCS Chemistry, 2021, 3(6): 1669-1677. |
81 | LI Jingjing, LI Bo, SUN Jing, et al. Engineered near-infrared fluorescent protein assemblies for robust bioimaging and therapeutic applications[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(17): 2000964. |
82 | ZHANG J R, SUN Y, QU Q, et al. Engineering non-covalently assembled protein nanoparticles for long-acting gouty arthritis therapy[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2021, 9(48): 9923-9931. |
83 | SU J J, LU S, JIANG S J, et al. Engineered protein photo-thermal hydrogels for outstanding in situ tongue cancer therapy[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(21): 2100619. |
84 | WANG Shidong, LI Bo, ZHANG Hongliang, et al. Improving bioavailability of hydrophobic prodrugs through supramolecular nanocarriers based on recombinant proteins for osteosarcoma treatment[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(20): 11252-11256. |
85 | MA Chao, LI Bo, ZHANG Jinrui, et al. Significantly improving the bioefficacy for rheumatoid arthritis with supramolecular nanoformulations[J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(16): 2100098. |
86 | LI J L, XING R R, BAI S, et al. Recent advances of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical applications[J]. Soft Matter, 2019, 15(8): 1704-1715. |
87 | LIU J W, GE X D, LIU L, et al. Challenges and opportunities of silk protein hydrogels in biomedical applications[J]. Materials Advances, 2022, 3(5): 2291-2308. |
88 | WEI Z, SUN J, LU S, et al. An engineered protein – Au bioplaster for efficient skin tumor therapy[J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(16): 2110062. |
89 | RISING A, JOHANSSON J. Toward spinning artificial spider silk[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2015, 11(5): 309-315. |
90 | LING S J, QIN Z, LI C M, et al. Polymorphic regenerated silk fibers assembled through bioinspired spinning[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 1387. |
91 | FRANCO A R, PALMA KIMMERLING E, SILVA C, et al. Silk-based antimicrobial polymers as a new platform to design drug-free materials to impede microbial infections[J]. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2018, 18(12): 1800262. |
92 | SCHACHT K, JÜNGST T, SCHWEINLIN M, et al. Biofabrication of cell-loaded 3D spider silk constructs[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(9): 2816-2820. |
93 | TOMKO J A, PENA-FRANCESCH A, JUNG H, et al. Tunable thermal transport and reversible thermal conductivity switching in topologically networked bio-inspired materials[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2018, 13(10): 959-964. |
94 | GADDES D, JUNG H, PENA-FRANCESCH A, et al. Self-healing textile: enzyme encapsulated layer-by-layer structural proteins[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(31): 20371-20378. |
95 | FU J, GUERETTE P A, PAVESI A, et al. Artificial hagfish protein fibers with ultra-high and tunable stiffness[J]. Nanoscale, 2017, 9(35): 12908-12915. |
96 | ANDERSSON M, JIA Q P, ABELLA A, et al. Biomimetic spinning of artificial spider silk from a chimeric minispidroin[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2017, 13(3): 262-264. |
97 | ZHANG J R, SUN J, LI B, et al. Robust biological fibers based on widely available proteins: facile fabrication and suturing application[J]. Small, 2020, 16(8): 1907598. |
98 | MOHAMMADI P, ARANKO A S, LANDOWSKI C P, et al. Biomimetic composites with enhanced toughening using silk-inspired triblock proteins and aligned nanocellulose reinforcements[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(9): eaaw2541. |
99 | MA C, LI B, SHAO B Q, et al. Anisotropic protein organofibers encoded with extraordinary mechanical behavior for cellular mechanobiology applications[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(48): 21481-21487. |
100 | SUN J, MA C, MAITY S, et al. Reversibly photo-modulating mechanical stiffness and toughness of bioengineered protein fibers[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(6): 3222-3228. |
101 | LUTZ T M, KIMNA C, CASINI A, et al. Bio-based and bio-inspired adhesives from animals and plants for biomedical applications[J]. Materials Today Bio, 2022, 13: 100203. |
102 | SUN J, HAN J Y, WANG F, et al. Bioengineered protein-based adhesives for biomedical applications[J]. Chemistry - A European Journal, 2022, 28(1): e202102902. |
103 | ROBERTS A D, FINNIGAN W, KELLY P P, et al. Non-covalent protein-based adhesives for transparent substrates-bovine serum albumin vs. recombinant spider silk[J]. Materials Today Bio, 2020, 7: 100068. |
104 | BRENNAN M J, KILBRIDE B F, WILKER J J, et al. A bioinspired elastin-based protein for a cytocompatible underwater adhesive[J]. Biomaterials, 2017, 124: 116-125. |
105 | WANG R, LI J Z, CHEN W, et al. A biomimetic mussel-inspired ε-poly-L-lysine hydrogel with robust tissue-anchor and anti-infection capacity[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(8): 1604894. |
106 | GONZALEZ M A, SIMON J R, GHOORCHIAN A, et al. Strong, tough, stretchable, and self-adhesive hydrogels from intrinsically unstructured proteins[J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(10): 1604743. |
107 | J-P BUFFET, CORRE E, DUVERNOIS-BERTHET E, et al. Adhesive gland transcriptomics uncovers a diversity of genes involved in glue formation in marine tube-building polychaetes[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 72: 316-328. |
108 | BECKER P T, LAMBERT A, LEJEUNE A, et al. Identification, characterization, and expression levels of putative adhesive proteins from the tube-dwelling polychaete Sabellaria alveolata [J]. The Biological Bulletin, 2012, 223(2): 217-225. |
109 | SHAO H, BACHUS K N, STEWART R J. A water-borne adhesive modeled after the sandcastle glue of P. californica [J]. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2009, 9(5): 464-471. |
110 | DICKINSON G H, VEGA I E, WAHL K J, et al. Barnacle cement: a polymerization model based on evolutionary concepts[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212(21): 3499-3510. |
111 | KEI K. Mini-review: barnacle adhesives and adhesion[J]. Biofouling, 2013, 29(6): 735-749. |
112 | STEWART R J. Protein-based underwater adhesives and the prospects for their biotechnological production[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 89(1): 27-33. |
113 | PRESTI M LO, RIZZO G, FARINOLA G M, et al. Bioinspired biomaterial composite for all-water-based high-performance adhesives[J]. Advanced Science, 2021, 8(16): 2004786. |
114 | XIAO L L, WANG Z L, SUN Y, et al. An artificial phase-transitional underwater bioglue with robust and switchable adhesion performance[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(21): 12082-12089. |
115 | ZHANG J R, LI B, ZUO J L, et al. An engineered protein adhesive with properties of tissue integration and controlled release for efficient cartilage repair[J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2021, 10(12): 2100109. |
[1] | Zhidian DIAO, Xixian WANG, Qing SUN, Jian XU, Bo MA. Advances and applications of single-cell Raman spectroscopy testing and sorting equipment [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 1020-1035. |
[2] | Hui LU, Fangli ZHANG, Lei HUANG. Establishment of iBioFoundry for synthetic biology applications [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 877-891. |
[3] | Zhonghu BAI, He REN, Jianqi NIE, Yang SUN. The recent progresses and applications of in-parallel fermentation technology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 904-915. |
[4] | Yujie WU, Xinxin LIU, Jianhui LIU, Kaiguang Yang, Zhigang SUI, Lihua ZHANG, Yukui ZHANG. Research progress of strain screening and quantitative analysis of key molecules based on high-throughput liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 1000-1019. |
[5] | Zhehui HU, Juan XU, Guangkai BIAN. Application of automated high-throughput technology in natural product biosynthesis [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 932-946. |
[6] | Huan LIU, Qiu CUI. Advances and applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in screening of microbial strains [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 980-999. |
[7] | Yannan WANG, Yuhui SUN. Base editing technology and its application in microbial synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(4): 720-737. |
[8] | Wanqiu LIU, Xiangyang JI, Huiling XU, Yicong LU, Jian LI. Cell-free protein synthesis system enables rapid and efficient biosynthesis of restriction endonucleases [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(4): 840-851. |
[9] | Meili SUN, Kaifeng WANG, Ran LU, Xiaojun JI. Rewiring and application of Yarrowia lipolytica chassis cell [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(4): 779-807. |
[10] | Zhi SUN, Ning YANG, Chunbo LOU, Chao TANG, Xiaojing YANG. Rational design for functional topology and its applications in synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(3): 444-463. |
[11] | Qilong LAI, Shuai YAO, Yuguo ZHA, Hong BAI, Kang NING. Microbiome-based biosynthetic gene cluster data mining techniques and application potentials [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(3): 611-627. |
[12] | Zhihang CHEN, Menglin JI, Yifei QI. Research progress of artificial intelligence in desiging protein structures [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(3): 464-487. |
[13] | Qiaozhen MENG, Fei GUO. Applications of foldability in intelligent enzyme engineering and design: take AlphaFold2 for example [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(3): 571-589. |
[14] | Sheng WANG, Zechen WANG, Weihua CHEN, Ke CHEN, Xiangda PENG, Fafen OU, Liangzhen ZHENG, Jinyuan SUN, Tao SHEN, Guoping ZHAO. Design of synthetic biology components based on artificial intelligence and computational biology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(3): 422-443. |
[15] | Hailong LV, Jian WANG, Hao LV, Jin WANG, Yong XU, Dayong GU. Synthetic biology for next-generation genetic diagnostics [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(2): 318-332. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||