DNA纳米技术与合成生物学

doi:10.12211/2096-8280.2021-063

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

合成生物学突破了经典生物学“格物致知”的研究范式，开启了“建物致知”“建物致用”的研究时代。合成生物学是以系统生物学为基础，结合工程学设计，运用现代生物学技术方法，通过构建新的生物体系以揭示生命规律和开发颠覆性技术的交叉学科。以DNA为主要建筑材料进行纳米尺度结构自组装的DNA纳米技术，具有高度可设计性、精确可寻址性、生物亲和性、模块化组装等独特优势，已经成为合成生物学重要的支持技术。本文介绍了利用DNA纳米结构实现核酸、蛋白质、磷脂等生物大分子的有序装配；构建仿生细胞元件（例如核孔、人工膜通道、网格蛋白），生物过程（例如膜融合、脂质转移、成管过程）和生化体系（例如RNA挤出纳米工厂、体外病毒衣壳蛋白合成和凝血系统）；及其在药物递送、肿瘤治疗等领域的应用。此外，未来的研究有望通过DNA纳米结构来更好地合成、模拟和调节天然生物体系。例如，如何一定程度恢复和利用DNA纳米结构携载遗传信息的能力；如何提高结构设计复杂性的同时，兼顾人工体系的简单性和生产的高效性；如何扩大生产规模，降低成本；如何在细胞中生产结构并组装。同时，临床应用层面仍有许多亟待解决的问题，比如增加药物的搭载效率，增强结构的靶向性，维持机体中结构稳定性，以及通过修饰进行免疫治疗。DNA纳米技术在合成生物学具有广泛的应用前景，将有助于认识生命本质、模拟生命过程、建立人工体系、开发改变未来的技术。

关键词: 合成生物学, DNA纳米技术, 有序装配, 人工体系, 医疗健康

Abstract:

Conventional biology investigates and examines life for knowledge and explanations. Synthetic biology, however, breaks through this paradigm and opens a new research era that relies on the reconstruction or creation of biological/bionic elements towards new properties and applications. As a multidisciplinary field, synthetic biology benefits from system biology, molecular biology, structural biology, bio-design and engineering and cutting-edge biological techniques. It reveals the law of life, and makes breakthroughs. DNA nanotechnology, using DNA as building materials to make self-assembled nanostructure, has become a significant support technique for synthetic biology. Besides the remarkable biological affinity of nucleic acids, DNA nanotechnology shows unique advantages of the precise designability, addressability, controllability and modular assembly. In this article, we reviewed the current progresses in how to use DNA nanostructure to direct the arrangement and assembly of other biomolecules (e.g. nucleic acids, proteins and lipids) and to construct or mimic novel cell elements (e.g. DNA nuclear pore, DNA membrane-spanning channel and DNA clathrin-mimic networks), biological reactions (e.g. membrane fusion, lipid transfer and vesicle tubulation), and biochemical systems (e.g. RNA-extruding nanofactories, in situ assembly of viral protein and coagulation system). We also introduced the attempts of employing DNA nano-robots for drug delivery and tumor therapy. However, further studies are expected to better synthesize, simulate and regulate biological systems by using DNA nanostructures. For example, how to recover the property of DNA to carry genetic/artificial information; how to balance the complexity and simplicity towards high efficient performance; how to expand the production scale and reduce the cost; how to produce functional structures in cells. Meanwhile, medical applications ask for more improvements, such as increasing drug loading efficiency, enhancing targeting specificity, maintaining structure stability invivo, lowering the immunogenicity and modifying adjuvant for immune therapy. In summary, DNA nanotechnology presents a broad application prospect in synthetic biology, which will help understanding the essence of life, simulating the process of life, establishing artificial systems and developing future technologies.

Key words: synthetic biology, DNA nanotechnology, artificial systems, orderly assembly, healthcare

中图分类号:

Q 81

施茜, 吴园园, 杨洋. DNA纳米技术与合成生物学[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(2): 302-319, doi: 10.12211/2096-8280.2021-063.

Qian SHI, Yuanyuan WU, yang YANG. DNA nanotechnology and synthetic biology[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2022, 3(2): 302-319, doi: 10.12211/2096-8280.2021-063.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 108

1	JACOB F, MONOD J. On the regulation of gene activity[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1961, 26: 193-211.
2	ELOWITZ M B, LEIBLER S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators[J]. Nature, 2000, 403(6767): 335-338.
3	GARDNER T S, CANTOR C R, COLLINS J J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli [J]. Nature, 2000, 403(6767): 339-342.
4	FREDENS J, WANG K, DE LA TORRE D, et al. Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome[J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7757): 514-518.
5	合成生物学全球初创公司图谱,万亿美金市场现状梳理[R/OL]. CB Insights, 2020. .
6	GROUP B F, BAKER D, CHURCH G, et al. Engineering life: Building a FAB for biology[J]. Scientific American, 2006, 294(6): 44-51.
7	SEEMAN N C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1982, 99(2): 237-247.
8	SEEMAN N C, SLEIMAN H F. DNA nanotechnology[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2018, 3: 17068.
9	ROTHEMUND P W K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns[J]. Nature, 2006, 440(7082): 297-302.
10	SANDERSON K. Bioengineering: what to make with DNA origami[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7286): 158-159.
11	DIETZ H, DOUGLAS S M, SHIH W M. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5941): 725-730.
12	HAN D R, PAL S, NANGREAVE J, et al. DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space[J]. Science, 2011, 332(6027): 342-346.
13	HAN D R, PAL S, YANG Y, et al. DNA gridiron nanostructures based on four-arm junctions[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6126): 1412-1415.
14	Tikhomirov G, Petersen P, Qian L. Fractal assembly of micrometre-scale DNA origami arrays with arbitrary patterns[J]. Nature, 2017, 552(7683): 67.
15	WAGENBAUER K F, SIGL C, DIETZ H. Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies[J]. Nature, 2017, 552(7683): 78-83.
16	YAN H, PARK S H, FINKELSTEIN G, et al. DNA-templated self-assembly of protein arrays and highly conductive nanowires[J]. Science, 2003, 301(5641): 1882-1884.
17	LIU W Y, ZHONG H, WANG R S, et al. Crystalline two-dimensional DNA-origami arrays[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 123(1): 278-281.
18	DOUGLAS S M, DIETZ H, LIEDL T, et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes[J]. Nature, 2009, 459(7245): 414-418.
19	PRAETORIUS F, DIETZ H. Self-assembly of genetically encoded DNA-protein hybrid nanoscale shapes[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6331): eaam5488.
20	ZHANG J P, LIU Y, KE Y G, et al. Periodic square-like gold nanoparticle arrays templated by self-assembled 2D DNA Nanogrids on a surface[J]. Nano Letters, 2006, 6(2): 248-251.
21	LUND K, LIU Y, LINDSAY S, et al. Self-assembling a molecular pegboard[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005, 127(50): 17606-17607.
22	DONG Y C, YANG Y R, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Cuboid vesicles formed by frame-guided assembly on DNA origami scaffolds[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(6): 1586-1589.
23	KE Y G, ONG L L, SHIH W M, et al. Three-dimensional structures self-assembled from DNA bricks[J]. Science, 2012, 338(6111): 1177-1183.
24	ONG L L, HANIKEL N, YAGHI O K, et al. Programmable self-assembly of three-dimensional nanostructures from 10, 000 unique components[J]. Nature, 2017, 552(7683): 72-77.
25	YAO G, ZHANG F, WANG F, et al. Meta-DNA structures[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2020, 12(11): 1067-1075.
26	CHANDRAN H, GOPALKRISHNAN N, YURKE B, et al. Meta-DNA: synthetic biology via DNA nanostructures and hybridization reactions[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2012, 9(72): 1637-1653.
27	YANG Y, ZHANG R, FAN C H. Shaping functional materials with DNA frameworks[J]. Trends in Chemistry, 2020, 2(2): 137-147.
28	ZHANG Y Y, MAO X H, LI F, et al. Nanoparticle-assisted alignment of carbon nanotubes on DNA origami[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(12): 4892-4896.
29	PEI H, SHA R J, WANG X W, et al. Organizing end-site-specific SWCNTs in specific loci using DNA[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(30): 11923-11928.
30	SUN W, SHEN J, ZHAO Z, et al. Precise pitch-scaling of carbon nanotube arrays within three-dimensional DNA nanotrenches[J]. Science, 2020, 368(6493): 874-877.
31	ATSUMI H, BELCHER A M. DNA origami and G-quadruplex hybrid complexes induce size control of single-walled carbon nanotubes via biological activation[J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(8): 7986-7995.
32	KNUDSEN J B, LIU L, BANK KODAL A L, et al. Routing of individual polymers in designed patterns[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2015, 10(10): 892-898.
33	TOKURA Y, HARVEY S, CHEN C J, et al. Fabrication of defined polydopamine nanostructures by DNA origami-templated polymerization[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(6): 1587-1591.
34	KE Y G, LINDSAY S, CHANG Y, et al. Self-assembled water-soluble nucleic acid probe tiles for label-free RNA hybridization assays[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5860): 180-183.
35	LIN C, JUNGMANN R, LEIFER A M, et al. Submicrometre geometrically encoded fluorescent barcodes self-assembled from DNA[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2012, 4(10): 832-839.
36	SEELIG G, SOLOVEICHIK D, ZHANG D Y, et al. Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits[J]. Science, 2006, 314(5805): 1585-1588.
37	QIAN L L, WINFREE E. Scaling up digital circuit computation with DNA strand displacement cascades[J]. Science, 2011, 332(6034): 1196-1201.
38	TIKHOMIROV G, PETERSEN P, QIAN L. Programmable disorder in random DNA tilings[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2017, 12(3): 251-259.
39	PETERSEN P, TIKHOMIROV G, QIAN L. Information-based autonomous reconfiguration in systems of interacting DNA nanostructures[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 5362.
40	CHERRY K M, QIAN L. Scaling up molecular pattern recognition with DNA-based winner-take-all neural networks[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7714): 370-376.
41	WOODS D, DOTY D, MYHRVOLD C, et al. Diverse and robust molecular algorithms using reprogrammable DNA self-assembly[J]. Nature, 2019, 567(7748): 366-372.
42	SHERMAN W B, SEEMAN N C. A precisely controlled DNA biped walking device[J]. Nano Letters, 2004, 4(7): 1203-1207.
43	GU H, CHAO J, XIAO S J, et al. A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line[J]. Nature, 2010, 465(7295): 202-205.
44	TIAN Y, HE Y, CHEN Y, et al. A DNAzyme that walks processively and autonomously along a one-dimensional track[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2005, 44(28): 4355-4358.
45	LUND K, MANZO A J, DABBY N, et al. Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes[J]. Nature, 2010, 465(7295): 206-210.
46	THUBAGERE A J, LI W, JOHNSON R F, et al. A cargo-sorting DNA robot[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6356): 1112.
47	MALLIK L, DHAKAL S, NICHOLS J, et al. Electron microscopic visualization of protein assemblies on flattened DNA origami[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(7): 7133-7141.
48	SHEN W Q, ZHONG H, NEFF D, et al. NTA directed protein nanopatterning on DNA origami nanoconstructs[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(19): 6660-6661.
49	YAMAZAKI T, HEDDLE J G, KUZUYA A, et al. Orthogonal enzyme arrays on a DNA origami scaffold bearing size-tunable wells[J]. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(15): 9122-9126.
50	CHHABRA R, SHARMA J, KE Y G, et al. Spatially addressable multiprotein nanoarrays templated by aptamer-tagged DNA nanoarchitectures[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(34): 10304-10305.
51	NGO T A, NAKATA E, SAIMURA M, et al. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(9): 3012-3021.
52	ZHOU K, KE Y G, WANG Q B. Selective in situ assembly of viral protein onto DNA origami[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(26): 8074-8077.
53	KOPATZ I, ZALK R, LEVI-KALISMAN Y, et al. Packaging of DNA origami in viral capsids[J]. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(21): 10160-10166.
54	FU J L, LIU M H, LIU Y, et al. Interenzyme substrate diffusion for an enzyme cascade organized on spatially addressable DNA nanostructures[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(12): 5516-5519.
55	FISHER P, SHEN Q, AKPINAR B, et al. A programmable DNA origami platform for organizing intrinsically disordered nucleoporins within nanopore confinement[J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(2): 1508-1518.
56	NAKATA E, DINH H, NGO T A, et al. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(6): 1016-1019.
57	KOßMANN K J, ZIEGLER C, ANGELIN A, et al. A rationally designed connector for assembly of protein-functionalized DNA nanostructures[J]. ChemBioChem, 2016, 17(12): 1102-1106.
58	VOIGT N V, TØRRING T, ROTARU A, et al. Single-molecule chemical reactions on DNA origami[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2010, 5(3): 200-203.
59	RINKER S, KE Y G, LIU Y, et al. Self-assembled DNA nanostructures for distance-dependent multivalent ligand-protein binding[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2008, 3(7): 418-422.
60	FU J, YANG Y R, JOHNSON-BUCK A, et al. Multi-enzyme complexes on DNA scaffolds capable of substrate channelling with an artificial swinging arm[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2014, 9(7): 531-536.
61	KE G L, LIU M H, JIANG S X, et al. Directional regulation of enzyme pathways through the control of substrate channeling on a DNA origami scaffold[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 128(26): 7609-7612.
62	YANG Y, WANG J, SHIGEMATSU H, et al. Self-assembly of size-controlled liposomes on DNA nanotemplates[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2016, 8(5): 476-483.
63	ZHANG Z, YANG Y, PINCET F, et al. Placing and shaping liposomes with reconfigurable DNA nanocages[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2017, 9(7): 653-659.
64	ZHAO Z, ZHANG M, HOGLE J M, et al. DNA-corralled nanodiscs for the structural and functional characterization of membrane proteins and viral entry[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(34): 10639-10643.
65	KETTERER P, ANANTH A N, LAMAN TRIP D S, et al. DNA origami scaffold for studying intrinsically disordered proteins of the nuclear pore complex[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 902.
66	LANGECKER M, ARNAUT V, MARTIN T G, et al. Synthetic lipid membrane channels formed by designed DNA nanostructures[J]. Science, 2012, 338(6109): 932-936.
67	LÜ C, GU X Y, LI H W, et al. Molecular transport through a biomimetic DNA channel on live cell membranes[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(11): 14616-14626.
68	LANPHERE C, OFFENBARTL-STIEGERT D, DOREY A, et al. Design, assembly, and characterization of membrane-spanning DNA nanopores[J]. Nature Protocols, 2021, 16(1): 86-130.
69	DOHERTY G J, MCMAHON H T. Mechanisms of endocytosis[J]. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 2009, 78: 857-902.
70	JOURNOT C M A, RAMAKRISHNA V, WALLACE M I, et al. Modifying membrane morphology and interactions with DNA origami clathrin-mimic networks[J]. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(9): 9973-9979.
71	XU W M, NATHWANI B, LIN C X, et al. A programmable DNA origami platform to organize SNAREs for membrane fusion[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(13): 4439-4447.
72	BIAN X, ZHANG Z, XIONG Q C, et al. A programmable DNA-origami platform for studying lipid transfer between bilayers[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2019, 15(8): 830-837
73	FROST A, UNGER V M, DE CAMILLI P. The BAR domain superfamily: membrane-molding macromolecules[J]. Cell, 2009, 137(2): 191-196.
74	GROME M W, ZHANG Z, PINCET F, et al. Vesicle tubulation with self-assembling DNA nanosprings[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(19): 5330-5334.
75	HAHN J, CHOU L Y T, SØRENSEN R S, et al. Extrusion of RNA from a DNA-origami-based nanofactory[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(2): 1550-1559.
76	ZHOU K, ZHOU Y H, PAN V, et al. Programming dynamic assembly of viral proteins with DNA origami[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020, 142(13): 5929-5932.
77	YANG L L, ZHAO Y M, XU X M, et al. An intelligent DNA nanorobot for autonomous anticoagulation[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(40): 17697-17704.
78	FUJITA K, OHMACHI M, IKEZAKI K, et al. Direct visualization of human myosin II force generation using DNA origami-based thick filaments[J]. Communications Biology, 2019, 2: 437.
79	ANGELL C, XIE S B, ZHANG L F, et al. DNA nanotechnology for precise control over drug delivery and gene therapy[J]. Small, 2016, 12(9): 1117-1132.
80	HU Q Q, LI H, WANG L H, et al. DNA nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery systems[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2019, 119(10): 6459-6506.
81	DOUGLAS S M, BACHELET I, CHURCH G M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads[J]. Science, 2012, 335(6070): 831-834.
82	AGUDELO D, BOURASSA P, BÉRUBÉ G, et al. Intercalation of antitumor drug doxorubicin and its analogue by DNA duplex: Structural features and biological implications[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2014, 66: 144-150.
83	KIM K R, KIM D R, LEE T, et al. Drug delivery by a self-assembled DNA tetrahedron for overcoming drug resistance in breast cancer cells[J]. Chemical Communications, 2013, 49(20): 2010.
84	NAITO Y, UI-TEI K. siRNA design software for a target gene-specific RNA interference[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2012, 3: 102.
85	GUO P X, COBAN O, SNEAD N M, et al. Engineering RNA for targeted siRNA delivery and medical application[J]. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2010, 62(6): 650-666.
86	LEE H, LYTTON-JEAN A K R, CHEN Y, et al. Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted in vivo siRNA delivery[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2012, 7(6): 389-393.
87	RAHMAN M A, WANG P F, ZHAO Z X, et al. Systemic delivery of Bc12-targeting siRNA by DNA nanoparticles suppresses cancer cell growth[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(50): 16023-16027.
88	LIU J B, SONG L L, LIU S L, et al. A DNA-based nanocarrier for efficient gene delivery and combined cancer therapy[J]. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(6): 3328-3334.
89	JIANG Q, SHI Y F, ZHANG Q, et al. A self-assembled DNA origami-gold nanorod complex for cancer theranostics[J]. Small, 2015, 11(38): 5134-5141.
90	WANG P F, RAHMAN M A, ZHAO Z X, et al. Visualization of the cellular uptake and trafficking of DNA origami nanostructures in cancer cells[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(7): 2478-2484.
91	GE Z L, GUO L J, WU G Q, et al. DNA origami-enabled engineering of ligand-drug conjugates for targeted drug delivery[J]. Small, 2020, 16(16): 1904857.
92	RANIOLO S, VINDIGNI G, OTTAVIANI A, et al. Selective targeting and degradation of doxorubicin-loaded folate-functionalized DNA nanocages[J]. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2018, 14(4): 1181-1190.
93	VINDIGNI G, RANIOLO S, OTTAVIANI A, et al. Receptor-mediated entry of pristine octahedral DNA nanocages in mammalian cells[J]. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(6): 5971-5979.
94	LIANG L, LI J, LI Q, et al. Single-particle tracking and modulation of cell entry pathways of a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure in live cells[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(30): 7745-7750.
95	KEUM J W, AHN J H, Design BERMUDEZ H., assembly, and activity of antisense DNA nanostructures[J]. Small, 2011, 7(24): 3529-3535.
96	BURNS J R, LAMARRE B, PYNE A L B, et al. DNA origami inside-out viruses[J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2018, 7(3): 767-773.
97	LIU K, XU C, LIU J Y. Regulation of cell binding and entry by DNA origami mediated spatial distribution of aptamers[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2020, 8(31): 6802-6809.
98	BHATIA D, ARUMUGAM S, NASILOWSKI M, et al. Quantum dot-loaded monofunctionalized DNA icosahedra for single-particle tracking of endocytic pathways[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2016, 11(12): 1112-1119.
99	XIA K, KONG H T, CUI Y Z, et al. Systematic study in mammalian cells showing no adverse response to tetrahedral DNA nanostructure[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(18): 15442-15448.
100	BASTINGS M M C, ANASTASSACOS F M, PONNUSWAMY N, et al. Modulation of the cellular uptake of DNA origami through control over mass and shape[J]. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(6): 3557-3564.
101	ZENG Y, LIU J J, YANG S, et al. Time-lapse live cell imaging to monitor doxorubicin release from DNA origami nanostructures[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2018, 6(11): 1605-1612.
102	KIM K R, LEE T, KIM B S, et al. Correction: Utilizing the bioorthogonal base-pairing system of l-DNA to design ideal DNA nanocarriers for enhanced delivery of nucleic acid cargos[J]. Chemical Science, 2015, 6(3): 2122.
103	LI Q S, ZHAO D, SHAO X R, et al. Aptamer-modified tetrahedral DNA nanostructure for tumor-targeted drug delivery[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(42): 36695-36701.
104	MIKKILÄ J, ESKELINEN A P, NIEMELÄ E H, et al. Virus-encapsulated DNA origami nanostructures for cellular delivery[J]. Nano Letters, 2014, 14(4): 2196-2200.
105	PERRAULT S D, SHIH W M. Virus-inspired membrane encapsulation of DNA nanostructures to achieve in vivo stability[J]. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(5): 5132-5140.
106	MA W J, ZHAN Y X, ZHANG Y X, et al. An intelligent DNA nanorobot with in vitro enhanced protein lysosomal degradation of HER2[J]. Nano Letters, 2019, 19(7): 4505-4517.
107	LI S P, JIANG Q, LIU S L, et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(3): 258-264.
108	LIU S L, JIANG Q, ZHAO X, et al. A DNA nanodevice-based vaccine for cancer immunotherapy[J]. Nature Materials, 2021, 20(3): 421-430.

	根据结合方式分类	DNA修饰	蛋白修饰	优点	缺点
非共价偶联	生物素-链亲和素^[47]	生物素	链亲和素	①具有可逆性；	结合不稳定
	Ni-NTA-Histag^[48]	NTA	Histag	②可进行定点定位修饰
	抗体-抗原^[49]	抗原	抗体	②可进行定点定位修饰
	核酸适配体-蛋白^[50]	核酸适配体	—
	DNA结合蛋白^[51]	特异的dsDNA	锌指蛋白
	RNA-病毒蛋白^[52]	RNA	病毒蛋白
	DNA-衣壳蛋白^[53]	—	衣壳蛋白
共价偶联	√非特异性			①结合较稳定；	结合位点不易控制
	SPDP^[54]	氨基	半胱氨酸残基	②反应温和，步骤简单	结合位点不易控制
	Sulfo-SMCC^[55]	氨基	半胱氨酸残基
	√特异性
	SNAP-tag^[56]	O6-烷基鸟嘌呤	SNAP-tag	①结合较稳定；	需要进行蛋白质工程
	Halo-tag^[57]	5-氯已烷	Halo-tag	②可控制结合位点	操作较复杂

[1]	卞佳豪, 杨广宇. 人工智能辅助的蛋白质工程[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(3): 429-444.
[2]	冯晴晴, 张天鲛, 赵潇, 聂广军. 合成纳米生物学——合成生物学与纳米生物学的交叉前沿[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(2): 260-278.
[3]	胥欣欣, 匡华. 基于合成受体的食品污染物生物检测进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(2): 399-414.
[4]	武伟红, 李炜, 张先恩, 崔宗强. 合成生物学与荧光成像技术[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(2): 369-384.
[5]	郑涵奇, 吴晴, 李洪军, 顾臻. 合成生物学与纳米生物学的交叉融合及其在生物医药领域的应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(2): 279-301.
[6]	任师超, 孙秋艳, 冯旭东, 李春. 微生物细胞工厂合成五环三萜皂苷类化合物[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(1): 168-183.
[7]	赵晓宇, 张浩, 李雪飞, 胡政. 进化视角下的定量生物学规律与人工生命合成[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(1): 6-21.
[8]	褚亚东, 赵宗保. 小型集成化自动移液工作站系统及应用[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(1): 195-208.
[9]	张亭, 冷梦甜, 金帆, 袁海. 合成生物研究重大科技基础设施概述[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(1): 184-194.
[10]	郭思敏, 叶斌, 徐飞. 美德伦理视角下的合成生物学技术伦理治理[J]. 合成生物学, 2022, 3(1): 224-237.
[11]	任杰, 曾安平. 基于二氧化碳的生物制造：从基础研究到工业应用的挑战[J]. 合成生物学, 2021, 2(6): 854-862.
[12]	郭亮, 高聪, 柳亚迪, 陈修来, 刘立明. 大肠杆菌生产饲用氨基酸的研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2021, 2(6): 964-981.
[13]	汪庆卓, 宋萍, 黄和. 合成生物技术驱动天然的真核油脂细胞工厂开发[J]. 合成生物学, 2021, 2(6): 920-941.
[14]	陈久洲, 王钰, 蒲伟, 郑平, 孙际宾. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸生物合成技术的发展及展望[J]. 合成生物学, 2021, 2(6): 1000-1016.
[15]	王凤姣, 徐海洋, 闫建斌, 李伟. 植物天然农药除虫菊酯的生物合成和应用研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2021, 2(5): 751-763.