A comparative analysis of global research and development competition in synthetic biology Synthetic Biology Journal    DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2024-087

Table 3 High-Value Patent Comparison by Country

Extracts from the Article

高价值专利的通用型评价指标体系涵盖了多个方面：包括文本撰写质量、权利稳定性、可维权性、技术重要性、运营成果价值、市场应用价值、专利有效期以及专利同族状况等［37］。本研究选取了简单同族数量超过3、维持年限超过10年、发生过转让的专利作为评价专利价值的关键指标。此外，合享价值度综合了技术稳定性、技术先进性、保护范围层面的20多个技术指标，被用于专利价值的评估工具［38］。如表3所示，在国际比较中，美国在上述四个评价指标上均显著领先，日本紧随其后，位列第二梯队，而中国则处于追赶态势，与美国之间存在显著的数量级差异。

Other Images/Table from this Article

• Fig. 1  Global Synthetic Biology Policies
• Fig. 2  Regional Development Planning Map of China's Synthetic Biology Industry
• Fig. 3  Global Publication Trends
• Fig. 4  Global Distribution of Sub-fields by Country
• Table1  China-US Research Impact in Synthetic Biology
• Fig. 5  China's Technology Competitiveness Matrix
• Fig. 6  Global Patent Filing Trends
• Fig. 7  Patent Sub-field Distribution by Major Source Countries
• Table 2  Major Patent Applicants
• Table 4  Overseas Patent Distribution by Country
• Table 5  Patents Entering China
• Fig. 8  Major PCT Patent Applicants
• Fig.9  PCT Patent Core Technology Distribution by Country
• Table 6  Representative Platform Facilities of the Global Synthetic Biology Industry