Progress in bioreactors and instruments for phenotype testing with synthetic biology research

doi:10.12211/2096-8280.2023-067

Synthetic Biology Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 16-37.DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2023-067

• Invited Review • Previous Articles Next Articles

Progress in bioreactors and instruments for phenotype testing with synthetic biology research

Xiaojie GUO¹^,², Xingjin JIAN¹^,², Liyan WANG³, Chong ZHANG¹^,²^,⁴, Xinhui XING¹^,²^,⁴^,⁵

^1.Institute of Biochemical Engineering，Department of Chemical Engineering，Tsinghua University，Beijing 100084，China
^2.Key Laboratory for Industrial Biocatalysis of the Ministry of Education，Beijing 100084，China
^3.Biobreeding Center，Wuxi Research Institute of Applied Technologies，Tsinghua University，Wuxi 214072，Jiangsu，China
^4.Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology，Tsinghua University，Beijing 100084，China
^5.Institute of Biopharmaceutical and Health Engineering，Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School，Shenzhen 518055，Guangdong，China

Received:2023-09-19 Revised:2023-11-02 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-02-29
Contact: Xinhui XING

合成生物学表型测试生物反应器及其装备化研究进展

郭肖杰¹^,², 剪兴金¹^,², 王立言³, 张翀¹^,²^,⁴, 邢新会¹^,²^,⁴^,⁵

^1.清华大学化学工程系，生物化工研究所，北京 100084
^2.工业生物催化教育部重点实验室，北京 100084
^3.清华大学无锡应用技术研究院生物育种中心，无锡 214000
^4.清华大学合成与系统生物学中心，北京 100084
^5.清华大学深圳国际研究生院生物医药与健康工程研究院，深圳 518055

通讯作者: 邢新会
作者简介:郭肖杰（1990—），男，博士研究生。研究方向为液滴微流控及其在微生物领域的装备化应用。 E-mail：gxj20@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
邢新会（1965—），男，教授。研究方向为生物化工、生物育种技术及装备等。 E-mail：xhxing@tsinghua.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFA0901500);国家自然科学基金重大仪器专项(21627812);深圳市可持续发展专项(KCXFZ20201221173207022)

Abstract

Abstract:

Over the past years, synthetic biology has seen significant development, establishing a typical "Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL)" cycle for engineering cell factories. This cycle has been becoming an enabling methodology for smart breeding to accelerate the development of biomanufacturing. In the DBTL cycle, the testing step primarily aims to evaluate the phenotypes of constructed cell factories, which can provide a large amount of data for further learning and iterative optimization. Due to the complexity of cellular metabolic networks and regulatory mechanisms, as well as the complicated associations between genotypes and phenotypes, the design and construction of cell factories have traditionally involved long-term and labor-intensive iterative experiments. In synthetic biology, the construction of cell factories with designed synthetic pathways is often combined with random mutation and evolution to build up a large screening library, which always requires a high throughput and efficient technology and equipment in the testing step. The testing step is the rate-limiting process in the entire DBTL cycle, and its efficiency is largely dependent on chassis cells themselves, as well as the throughput of bioreactors and instruments needed for their phenotype testing. Here, this review article focuses on an overview of bioreactors and instruments with different throughput scales used for the phenotype testing in synthetic biology. We introduce their characteristics and application scenarios, including single-cell detecting and screening technology as well as pico-, nano-, micro-, milli-, and liter-scale bioreactors. Moreover, this article also points out the application potential of existing phenotype testing bioreactors and instruments, and illustrates how they can be selected for specific research purposes. Finally, the challenges and perspectives for phenotype testing bioreactors and instruments are summarized, which hopefully provides a reference for a wide range of synthetic biology researchers to properly select and use phenotype testing instruments.

Key words: synthetic biology, high throughput screening, droplet microfluidics, bioreactor, micro-well plate, micro-tube bioreactor

摘要：

合成生物学经过多年的发展，形成了典型的细胞工厂创制“设计-构建-测试-学习”（design-build-test-learn， DBTL）循环，成为支撑面向加速生物制造发展的智慧生物育种的重要方法。其中，测试环节是对前期所设计与构建的生物体系进行表型测试，以提供大量数据用于后续的学习和迭代升级。测试阶段的通量主要依赖于细胞自身或其培养测试所使用的生物反应器及其装备，是整个DBTL流程的限速步骤。本文系统综述了合成生物学表型测试所开发的面向不同通量的生物反应器及装备，从单细胞检测和筛选及不同尺度生物反应器包括皮纳升级生物反应器、微升级生物反应器、毫升级生物反应器和升级生物反应器等，系统地介绍了各自的特点和应用场景。同时，指出了现有生物反应器及其装备的应用潜力、面临的挑战与发展趋势，为合成生物学表型测试技术研究提供重要参考。

关键词: 合成生物学, 高通量筛选, 液滴微流控, 生物反应器, 微孔板, 微型管式生物反应器

CLC Number:

Q816

Xiaojie GUO, Xingjin JIAN, Liyan WANG, Chong ZHANG, Xinhui XING. Progress in bioreactors and instruments for phenotype testing with synthetic biology research[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(1): 16-37.

郭肖杰, 剪兴金, 王立言, 张翀, 邢新会. 合成生物学表型测试生物反应器及其装备化研究进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2024, 5(1): 16-37.

Figures/Tables 8

References 179

1	CAMERON D E, BASHOR C J, COLLINS J J. A brief history of synthetic biology[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2014, 12(5): 381-390.
2	史硕博, 张翀, 成喜雨, 等. 挑战造物主:合成生物学使能工具[J]. 合成生物学, 2023, 4(1): 1-4.
	SHI S B, ZHANG C, CHENG X Y, et al. Challenging the creator: an enabling tool for synthetic biology[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(1): 1-4.
3	LAWSON C E, HARCOMBE W R, HATZENPICHLER R, et al. Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2019, 17(12): 725-741.
4	GURDO N, VOLKE D C, MCCLOSKEY D, et al. Automating the design-build-test-learn cycle towards next-generation bacterial cell factories[J]. New Biotechnology, 2023, 74: 1-15.
5	孙梦楚, 陆亮宇, 申晓林, 等. 基于荧光检测的高通量筛选技术和装备助力细胞工厂构建[J]. 合成生物学, 2023, 4(5): 947-965.
	SUN M C, LU L Y, SHEN X L, et al. Fluorescence detection-based high-throughput screening systems and devices facilitate cell factories construction[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 947-965.
6	SANDLE T. History and development of microbiological culture media[J/OL]. The Journal (Instituteof Science and Technology), 2011: 10-14[2023-09-01]. .
7	MCKINNON K M. Flow cytometry: an overview[J]. Current Protocols in Immunology, 2018, 120(1): 5.1.1-5.1.11.
8	JAKOBSSON O, GRENVALL C, NORDIN M, et al. Acoustic actuated fluorescence activated sorting of microparticles[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(11): 1943-1950.
9	KINNUNEN M, KARMENYAN A. Overview of single-cell elastic light scattering techniques[J]. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2015, 20(5): 051040.
10	SU X T, SINGH K, ROZMUS W, et al. Light scattering characterization of mitochondrial aggregation in single cells[J]. Optics Express, 2009, 17(16): 13381-13388.
11	HUANG W E, WARD A D, WHITELEY A S. Raman tweezers sorting of single microbial cells[J]. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2009, 1(1): 44-49.
12	MCILVENNA D, HUANG W E, DAVISON P, et al. Continuous cell sorting in a flow based on single cell resonance Raman spectra[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(8): 1420-1429.
13	SONG Y Z, KASTER A K, VOLLMERS J, et al. Single-cell genomics based on Raman sorting reveals novel carotenoid-containing bacteria in the Red Sea[J]. Microbial Biotechnology, 2017, 10(1): 125-137.
14	GROSS A, SCHÖNDUBE J, NIEKRAWITZ S, et al. Single-cell printer: automated, on demand, and label free[J]. Journal of Laboratory Automation, 2013, 18(6): 504-518.
15	NITTA N, SUGIMURA T, ISOZAKI A, et al. Intelligent image-activated cell sorting[J]. Cell, 2018, 175(1): 266-276.e13.
16	KOVAC J R, VOLDMAN J. Intuitive, image-based cell sorting using optofluidic cell sorting[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79(24): 9321-9330.
17	KIM U, SOH H T. Simultaneous sorting of multiple bacterial targets using integrated dielectrophoretic-magnetic activated cell sorter[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9(16): 2313-2318.
18	ADAMS J D, KIM U, SOH H T. Multitarget magnetic activated cell sorter[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(47): 18165-18170.
19	SEMPLE J W, ALLEN D, CHANG W, et al. Rapid separation of CD4+ and CD19+ lymphocyte populations from human peripheral blood by a magnetic activated cell sorter (MACS)[J]. Cytometry, 1993, 14(8): 955-960.
20	FAENZA A, BOCCHI M, PECORARI N, et al. Impedance measurement technique for high-sensitivity cell detection in microstructures with non-uniform conductivity distribution[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2012, 12(11): 2046-2052.
21	SCHOENDUBE J, WRIGHT D, ZENGERLE R, et al. Single-cell printing based on impedance detection[J]. Biomicrofluidics, 2015, 9(1): 014117.
22	TANG D Z, JIANG L, TANG W L, et al. Cost-effective portable microfluidic impedance cytometer for broadband impedance cell analysis based on viscoelastic focusing[J]. Talanta, 2022, 242: 123274.
23	PRASHER D C. Using GFP to see the light[J]. Trends in Genetics, 1995, 11(8): 320-323.
24	POLLOK B A, HEIM R. Using GFP in FRET-based applications[J]. Trends in Cell Biology, 1999, 9(2): 57-60.
25	TAJIK M, BAHARFAR M, DONALD W A. Single-cell mass spectrometry[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2022, 40(11): 1374-1392.
26	SLAVOV N. Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2021, 60: 1-9.
27	SPITZER M H, NOLAN G P. Mass cytometry: single cells, many features[J]. Cell, 2016, 165(4): 780-791.
28	DE WAGENAAR B, DEKKER S, DE BOER H L, et al. Towards microfluidic sperm refinement: impedance-based analysis and sorting of sperm cells[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(8): 1514-1522.
29	ZBOROWSKI M, CHALMERS J J. Magnetic cell sorting[M/OL]//Immunochemical protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2005: 291-300 [2023-09-01]. .
30	GROVER S C, SKIRTACH A G, GAUTHIER R C, et al. Automated single-cell sorting system based on optical trapping[J]. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2001, 6(1): 14-22.
31	WANG M M, TU E, RAYMOND D E, et al. Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23(1): 83-87.
32	JOHANSSON L, NIKOLAJEFF F, JOHANSSON S, et al. On-chip fluorescence-activated cell sorting by an integrated miniaturized ultrasonic transducer[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 81(13): 5188-5196.
33	NITTA N, IINO T, ISOZAKI A, et al. Raman image-activated cell sorting[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 3452.
34	CHEN P, FENG X J, HU R, et al. Hydrodynamic gating valve for microfluidic fluorescence-activated cell sorting[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 663(1): 1-6.
35	JIAN X J, GUO X J, CAI Z S, et al. Single-cell microliter-droplet screening system (MISS Cell): an integrated platform for automated high-throughput microbial monoclonal cultivation and picking[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2023, 120(3): 778-792.
36	GROSS A, SCHOENDUBE J, ZIMMERMANN S, et al. Technologies for single-cell isolation[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16(8): 16897-16919.
47	WELZEL G, SEITZ D, SCHUSTER S. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) can be used as a large-scale method for establishing zebrafish neuronal cell cultures[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 7959.
38	UOSAKI H, FUKUSHIMA H, TAKEUCHI A, et al. Efficient and scalable purification of cardiomyocytes from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells by VCAM1 surface expression[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(8): e23657.
39	ZHANG P R, REN L H, ZHANG X, et al. Raman-activated cell sorting based on dielectrophoretic single-cell trap and release[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(4): 2282-2289.
40	REN L Q, YANG S J, ZHANG P R, et al. Fluorescence-activated cell sorters: standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW)-based fluorescence-activated cell sorter[J]. Small, 2018, 14(40): 1801996.
41	BEEBE D J, MOORE J S, YU Q, et al. Microfluidic tectonics: a comprehensive construction platform for microfluidic systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97(25): 13488-13493.
42	HUANG L R, COX E C, AUSTIN R H, et al. Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5673): 987-990.
43	LOUTHERBACK K, D'SILVA J, LIU L Y, et al. Deterministic separation of cancer cells from blood at 10 mL/min[J]. AIP Advances, 2012, 2(4): 042107.
44	AMINI H, LEE W, DI CARLO D. Inertial microfluidic physics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(15): 2739-2761.
45	DI CARLO D. Inertial microfluidic physics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9(21): 3038-3046.
46	LINDSTRÖM S, ANDERSSON-SVAHN H. Overview of single-cell analyses: microdevices and applications[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2010, 10(24): 3363-3372.
47	LINDSTRÖM S, ANDERSSON-SVAHN H. Miniaturization of biological assays—overview on microwell devices for single-cell analyses[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 2011, 1810(3): 308-316.
48	LINDSTRÖM S, ANDERSSON-SVAHN H. Single-cell culture in microwells[M/OL]// Single-cell analysis. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2012: 41-52 [2023-09-01]. .
49	ZENG S J, LIU X, XIE H A, et al. Basic technologies for droplet microfluidics[M/OL]//Microfluidics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011: 69-90 [2023-09-01]. .
50	KHORSHIDI M ALI, RAJESWARI P K P, WÄHLBY C, et al. Automated analysis of dynamic behavior of single cells in picoliter droplets[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(5): 931-937.
51	BOEDICKER J Q, VINCENT M E, ISMAGILOV R F. Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(32): 5908-5911.
52	VINCENT M E, LIU W S, HANEY E B, et al. Microfluidic stochastic confinement enhances analysis of rare cells by isolating cells and creating high density environments for control of diffusible signals[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(3): 974-984.
53	ZAGNONI M, COOPER J M. Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput analysis of cells and particles[M/OL]//Methods in cell biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011, 102: 23-48 [2023-09-01]. .
54	HENGOJU S, TOVAR M, MAN D K W, et al. Droplet microfluidics for microbial biotechnology[M/OL]//Microfluidics in biotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 129-157 [2023-09-01]. .
55	TU R, LI L P, YUAN H L, et al. Biosensor-enabled droplet microfluidic system for the rapid screening of 3-dehydroshikimic acid produced in Escherichia coli [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2020, 47(12): 1155-1160.
56	LI L P, TU R, SONG G T, et al. Development of a synthetic 3-dehydroshikimate biosensor in Escherichia coli for metabolite monitoring and genetic screening[J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2019, 8(2): 297-306.
57	TERRY S C, JERMAN J H, ANGELL J B. A gas chromatographic air analyzer fabricated on a silicon wafer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1979, 26(12): 1880-1886.
58	WEIBEL D B, DILUZIO W R, WHITESIDES G M. Microfabrication meets microbiology[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2007, 5(3): 209-218.
59	XIA Y N, WHITESIDES G M. Soft lithography[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1998, 37(5): 550-575.
60	WHITESIDES G M, OSTUNI E, TAKAYAMA S, et al. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry[J]. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 3: 335-373.
61	VAN DEN BERG A, LAMMERINK T S J. Micro total analysis systems: microfluidic aspects, integration concept and applications[M/OL]//Topics in current chemistry: microsystem technology in chemistry and life science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998: 21-49 [2023-09-01]. .
62	FRISAN T, LEVITSKY V, MASUCCI M. Limiting dilution assay[M/OL]//Epstein-Barr virus protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2003: 213-216 [2023-09-01]. .
63	SÁNCHEZ BAREA J, LEE J, KANG D K. Recent advances in droplet-based microfluidic technologies for biochemistry and molecular biology[J]. Micromachines, 2019, 10(6): 412.
64	KAMINSKI T S, GARSTECKI P. Controlled droplet microfluidic systems for multistep chemical and biological assays[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(20): 6210-6226.
65	JOENSSON H N, ANDERSSON SVAHN H. Droplet microfluidics—a tool for single-cell analysis[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(49): 12176-12192.
66	VOLLENBROEK J C, NIEUWELINK A E, BOMER J G, et al. Droplet microreactor for high-throughput fluorescence-based measurements of single catalyst particle acidity[J]. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2023, 9: 39.
67	KAMINSKI T S, SCHELER O, GARSTECKI P. Droplet microfluidics for microbiology: techniques, applications and challenges[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(12): 2168-2187.
68	ZHU P G, WANG L Q. Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2017, 17(1): 34-75.
69	VÁŇOVÁ B, MALICHEROVÁ B, BURJANIVOVÁ T, et al. Droplet digital PCR as a novel diagnostic tool[J/OL]. Klinicka Onkologie, 2021, 34(1): 33-39[2023-09-01]. .
70	LI H Y, BAI R L, ZHAO Z Y, et al. Application of droplet digital PCR to detect the pathogens of infectious diseases[J]. Bioscience Reports, 2018, 38(6): BSR20181170.
71	SHEMBEKAR N, CHAIPAN C, UTHARALA R, et al. Droplet-based microfluidics in drug discovery, transcriptomics and high-throughput molecular genetics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(8): 1314-1331.
72	WANG X X, XIN Y, REN L H, et al. Positive dielectrophoresis-based Raman-activated droplet sorting for culture-free and label-free screening of enzyme function in vivo [J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(32): eabb3521.
73	YANG L, JENSEN K F. Mass transport and reactions in the tube-in-tube reactor[J]. Organic Process Research & Development, 2013, 17(6): 927-933.
74	MARTIN K, HENKEL T, BAIER V, et al. Generation of larger numbers of separated microbial populations by cultivation in segmented-flow microdevices[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2003, 3(3): 202-207.
75	LI R R, GUO X J, XIONG K, et al. Microbial micro-tube culture system: a miniature bioreactor for controllable bubble-free oxygen supply based on high gas-permeability Teflon tube[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 191: 108789.
76	MAHLER L, TOVAR M, WEBER T, et al. Enhanced and homogeneous oxygen availability during incubation of microfluidic droplets[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(123): 101871-101878.
77	BARET J C, MILLER O J, TALY V, et al. Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9(13): 1850-1858.
78	OTA Y, SAITO K, TAKAGI T, et al. Fluorescent nucleic acid probe in droplets for bacterial sorting (FNAP-sort) as a high-throughput screening method for environmental bacteria with various growth rates[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(4): e0214533.
79	WANG X X, REN L H, SU Y T, et al. Raman-activated droplet sorting (RADS) for label-free high-throughput screening of microalgal single-cells[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 89(22): 12569-12577.
80	SAFIR F, VU N, TADESSE L F, et al. Combining acoustic bioprinting with AI-assisted Raman spectroscopy for high-throughput identification of bacteria in blood[J]. Nano Letters, 2023, 23(6): 2065-2073.
81	ZANG E, BRANDES S, TOVAR M, et al. Real-time image processing for label-free enrichment of Actinobacteria cultivated in picolitre droplets[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2013, 13(18): 3707-3713.
82	WATTERSON W J, TANYERI M, WATSON A R, et al. Droplet-based high-throughput cultivation for accurate screening of antibiotic resistant gut microbes[J]. eLife, 2020, 9: e56998.
83	GIRAULT M, KIM H, ARAKAWA H, et al. An on-chip imaging droplet-sorting system: a real-time shape recognition method to screen target cells in droplets with single cell resolution[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 40072.
84	LIU X, PAINTER R E, ENESA K, et al. High-throughput screening of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in picodroplets[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(9): 1636-1643.
85	FAN W H, CHEN X, GE Y Q, et al. Single-cell impedance analysis of osteogenic differentiation by droplet-based microfluidics[J]. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2019, 145: 111730.
86	VAN MEERTEN S G J, VAN BENTUM P J M, KENTGENS A P M. Shim-on-chip design for microfluidic NMR detectors[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 90(17): 10134-10138.
87	DAVOODI H, NORDIN N, BORDONALI L, et al. An NMR-compatible microfluidic platform enabling in situ electrochemistry[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2020, 20(17): 3202-3212.
88	GOTO H, KANAI Y, YOTSUI A, et al. Microfluidic screening system based on boron-doped diamond electrodes and dielectrophoretic sorting for directed evolution of NAD(P)-dependent oxidoreductases[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2020, 20(4): 852-861.
89	PAN C W, HORVATH D G, BRAZA S, et al. Sorting by interfacial tension (SIFT): label-free selection of live cells based on single-cell metabolism[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2019, 19(8): 1344-1351.
90	SUN S W, KENNEDY R T. Droplet electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for high throughput screening for enzyme inhibitors[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(18): 9309-9314.
91	HOLLAND-MORITZ D A, WISMER M K, MANN B F, et al. Mass activated droplet sorting (MADS) enables high-throughput screening of enzymatic reactions at nanoliter scale[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(11): 4470-4477.
92	GIELEN F, HOURS R, EMOND S, et al. Ultrahigh-throughput–directed enzyme evolution by absorbance-activated droplet sorting (AADS)[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(47): E7383-E7389.
93	DUNCOMBE T A, PONTI A, SEEBECK F P, et al. UV–vis spectra-activated droplet sorting for label-free chemical identification and collection of droplets[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2021, 93(38): 13008-13013.
94	HASAN S, GEISSLER D, WINK K, et al. Fluorescence lifetime-activated droplet sorting in microfluidic chip systems[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2019, 19(3): 403-409.
95	FERRARO D, CHAMP J, TESTE B, et al. Droplet microfluidic and magnetic particles platform for cancer typing[M/OL]// Methods in molecular biology: microchip diagnostics. New York: Humana Press, 2017, 1547: 113-121 [2023-09-01]. .
96	ZHU G P, WANG Q Y, MA Z K, et al. Droplet manipulation under a magnetic field: a review[J]. Biosensors, 2022, 12(3): 156.
97	SHAH G J, OHTA A T, CHIOU E P Y, et al. EWOD-driven droplet microfluidic device integrated with optoelectronic tweezers as an automated platform for cellular isolation and analysis[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9(12): 1732-1739.
98	SCHMID L, WEITZ D A, FRANKE T. Sorting drops and cells with acoustics: acoustic microfluidic fluorescence-activated cell sorter[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(19): 3710-3718.
99	SCIAMBI A, ABATE A R. Accurate microfluidic sorting of droplets at 30 kHz[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2015, 15(1): 47-51.
100	QIN Y L, WU L, WANG J G, et al. A fluorescence-activated single-droplet dispenser for high accuracy single-droplet and single-cell sorting and dispensing[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(10): 6815-6819.
101	KIM H S, HSU S C, HAN S I, et al. High-throughput droplet microfluidics screening platform for selecting fast-growing and high lipid-producing microalgae from a mutant library[J]. Plant Direct, 2017, 1(3): e00011.
102	FU X Z, ZHANG Y Y, XU Q A, et al. Recent advances on sorting methods of high-throughput droplet-based microfluidics in enzyme directed evolution[J]. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2021, 9: 666867.
103	秦伟彤, 杨广宇. 微液滴高通量筛选方法的研究与应用进展[J]. 合成生物学, 2023, 4(5): 966-979.
	QIN W T, YANG G Y. Research and application progress of microdroplets high throughput screening methods[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 966-979.
104	CHIU F W Y, STAVRAKIS S. High-throughput droplet-based microfluidics for directed evolution of enzymes[J]. Electrophoresis, 2019, 40(21): 2860-2872.
105	BROWER K K, CARSWELL-CRUMPTON C, KLEMM S, et al. Double emulsion flow cytometry with high-throughput single droplet isolation and nucleic acid recovery[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2020, 20(12): 2062-2074.
106	BROWER K K, KHARITON M, SUZUKI P H, et al. Double emulsion picoreactors for high-throughput single-cell encapsulation and phenotyping via FACS[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(19): 13262-13270.
107	COWELL T, HAN H S. Double emulsion flow cytometry for rapid single genome detection[M/OL]// Methods in molecular biology: single-cell assays. New York: Humana, 2023, 2689: 155-167 [2023-09-01]. .
108	SCHAERLI Y. Bacterial microcolonies in gel beads for high-throughput screening[J/OL]. Bio-protocol, 2018, 8(13): e2911[2023-09-01]. .
109	BARET J C. Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2012, 12(3): 422-433.
110	RIECHERS B, MAES F, AKOURY E, et al. Surfactant adsorption kinetics in microfluidics[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(41): 11465-11470.
111	ETIENNE G, VIAN A, BIOČANIN M, et al. Cross-talk between emulsion drops: how are hydrophilic reagents transported across oil phases?[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2018, 18(24): 3903-3912.
112	CHOWDHURY M S, ZHENG W S, KUMARI S, et al. Dendronized fluorosurfactant for highly stable water-in-fluorinated oil emulsions with minimal inter-droplet transfer of small molecules[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 4546.
113	COURTOIS F, OLGUIN L F, WHYTE G, et al. Controlling the retention of small molecules in emulsion microdroplets for use in cell-based assays[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 81(8): 3008-3016.
114	GRUNER P, RIECHERS B, SEMIN B, et al. Controlling molecular transport in minimal emulsions[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 10392.
115	MAZUTIS L, BARET J C, TREACY P, et al. Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9(20): 2902-2908.
116	SKHIRI Y, GRUNER P, SEMIN B, et al. Dynamics of molecular transport by surfactants in emulsions[J]. Soft Matter, 2012, 8(41): 10618-10627.
117	PAN M, ROSENFELD L, KIM M, et al. Fluorinated pickering emulsions impede interfacial transport and form rigid interface for the growth of anchorage-dependent cells[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(23): 21446-21453.
118	SANDOZ P A, CHUNG A J, WEAVER W M, et al. Sugar additives improve signal fidelity for implementing two-phase resorufin-based enzyme immunoassays[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(23): 6637-6643.
119	MAYR L M, BOJANIC D. Novel trends in high-throughput screening[J]. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 2009, 9(5): 580-588.
120	JAKIELA S, KAMINSKI T S, CYBULSKI O, et al. Bacterial growth and adaptation in microdroplet chemostats[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(34): 8908-8911.
121	GRODRIAN A, METZE J, HENKEL T, et al. Segmented flow generation by chip reactors for highly parallelized cell cultivation[J]. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2004, 19(11): 1421-1428.
122	DUETZ W A, CHASE M, BILLS G. Miniaturization of fermentations[M/OL]//Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press, 2010: 99-116 [2023-09-01]. .
123	SARNAIK A, LIU A, NIELSEN D, et al. High-throughput screening for efficient microbial biotechnology[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2020, 64: 141-150.
124	HERMANN R, LEHMANN M, BÜCHS J. Characterization of gas-liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2003, 81(2): 178-186.
125	ELIAS C B, DESAI R B, PATOLE M S, et al. Turbulent shear stress—effect on mammalian cell culture and measurement using laser Doppler anemometer[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1995, 50(15): 2431-2440.
126	AULD D S, COASSIN P A, COUSSENS N P, et al. Microplate selection and recommended practices in high-throughput screening and quantitative biology[M/OL]. Assay guidance manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 2004. .
127	HUBER R, RITTER D, HERING T, et al. Robo-Lector-a novel platform for automated high-throughput cultivations in microtiter plates with high information content[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2009, 8(1): 42.
128	PILAREK M, GLAZYRINA J, NEUBAUER P. Enhanced growth and recombinant protein production of Escherichia coli by a perfluorinated oxygen carrier in miniaturized fed-batch cultures[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2011, 10: 50.
129	PILAREK M, BRAND E, HILLIG F, et al. Enhanced plasmid production in miniaturized high-cell-density cultures of Escherichia coli supported with perfluorinated oxygen carrier[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 36(8): 1079-1086.
130	MEYER A, CONDON R G G, KEIL G, et al. Fluorinert, an oxygen carrier, improves cell culture performance in deep square 96-well plates by facilitating oxygen transfer[J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2012, 28(1): 171-178.
131	MANSOURY M, HAMED M, KARMUSTAJI R, et al. The edge effect: a global problem. The trouble with culturing cells in 96-well plates[J]. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 2021, 26: 100987.
132	BARABAN L, BERTHOLLE F, SALVERDA M L M, et al. Millifluidic droplet analyser for microbiology[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2011, 11(23): 4057-4062.
133	BOEDICKER J Q, LI L, KLINE T R, et al. Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2008, 8(8): 1265-1272.
134	BOITARD L, COTTINET D, BREMOND N, et al. Growing microbes in millifluidic droplets[J]. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2015, 15(3): 318-326.
135	JIAN X J, GUO X J, WANG J, et al. Microbial microdroplet culture system (MMC): an integrated platform for automated, high-throughput microbial cultivation and adaptive evolution[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2020, 117(6): 1724-1737.
136	DONG L B, CHEN D W, LIU S J, et al. Automated chemotactic sorting and single-cell cultivation of microbes using droplet microfluidics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 24192.
137	AOI Y, EPSTEIN S. New devices for cultivation[M/OL]//Manual of environmental microbiology. 4th Edition. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press, 2015: 2.1.3[2023-09-01]. .
138	CAO J L, KÜRSTEN D, SCHNEIDER S, et al. Uncovering toxicological complexity by multi-dimensional screenings in microsegmented flow: modulation of antibiotic interference by nanoparticles[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2012, 12(3): 474-484.
139	CHEN D L, LI L, REYES S, et al. Using three-phase flow of immiscible liquids to prevent coalescence of droplets in microfluidic channels: criteria to identify the third liquid and validation with protein crystallization[J]. Langmuir: the ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, 2007, 23(4): 2255-2260.
140	CHEN D L, ISMAGILOV R F. Microfluidic cartridges preloaded with nanoliter plugs of reagents: an alternative to 96-well plates for screening[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2006, 10(3): 226-231.
141	SHUI L L, EIJKEL J C T, VAN DEN BERG A. Multiphase flow in microfluidic systems-control and applications of droplets and interfaces[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 133(1): 35-49.
142	BETTS J I, BAGANZ F. Miniature bioreactors: current practices and future opportunities[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2006, 5: 21.
143	GARCIA-OCHOA F, GOMEZ E. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27(2): 153-176.
144	DUETZ W A. Microtiter plates as mini-bioreactors: miniaturization of fermentation methods[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2007, 15(10): 469-475.
145	ZIMMERMANN H F, JOHN G T, TRAUTHWEIN H, et al. Rapid evaluation of oxygen and water permeation through microplate sealing tapes[J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2003, 19(3): 1061-1063.
146	DUETZ W A, RÜEDI L, HERMANN R, et al. Methods for intense aeration, growth, storage, and replication of bacterial strains in microtiter plates[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(6): 2641-2646.
147	MARQUES M P C, CABRAL J M S, FERNANDES P. Bioprocess scale-up: quest for the parameters to be used as criterion to move from microreactors to lab-scale[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2010, 85(9): 1184-1198.
148	WEWETZER S J, KUNZE M, LADNER T, et al. Parallel use of shake flask and microtiter plate online measuring devices (RAMOS and BioLector) reduces the number of experiments in laboratory-scale stirred tank bioreactors[J]. Journal of Biological Engineering, 2015, 9: 9.
149	FUNKE M, DIEDERICHS S, KENSY F, et al. The baffled microtiter plate: increased oxygen transfer and improved online monitoring in small scale fermentations[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2009, 103(6): 1118-1128.
150	KLÖCKNER W, BÜCHS J. Advances in shaking technologies[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2012, 30(6): 307-314.
151	KUMAR S, WITTMANN C, HEINZLE E. Review: minibioreactors[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2004, 26(1): 1-10.
152	BÜCHS J. Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 7(2): 91-98.
153	WITTMANN C, KIM H M, JOHN G, et al. Characterization and application of an optical sensor for quantification of dissolved O₂ in shake-flasks[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2003, 25(5): 377-380.
154	TAKAHASHI M, AOYAGI H. Practices of shake-flask culture and advances in monitoring CO₂ and O₂ [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(10): 4279-4289.
155	WARR S R C. Microbioreactors and scale-down models: growth of CHO cells using the pall micro24 microreactor system[M/OL]// Methods in molecular biology: animal cell biotechnology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2014, 1104: 149-165 [2023-09-01]. .
156	RAMIREZ-VARGAS R, VITAL-JACOME M, CAMACHO-PEREZ E, et al. Characterization of oxygen transfer in a 24-well microbioreactor system and potential respirometric applications[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2014, 186: 58-65.
157	BETTS J I, DOIG S D, BAGANZ F. Characterization and application of a miniature 10 mL stirred-tank bioreactor, showing scale-down equivalence with a conventional 7 L reactor[J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2006, 22(3): 681-688.
158	HORTSCH R, STRATMANN A, WEUSTER-BOTZ D. New milliliter-scale stirred tank bioreactors for the cultivation of mycelium forming microorganisms[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2010, 106(3): 443-451.
159	KARIMI A, GOLBABAEI F, MEHRNIA M R, et al. Oxygen mass transfer in a stirred tank bioreactor using different impeller configurations for environmental purposes[J]. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 2013, 10(1): 6.
160	AMER M, FENG Y, RAMSEY J D. Using CFD simulations and statistical analysis to correlate oxygen mass transfer coefficient to both geometrical parameters and operating conditions in a stirred-tank bioreactor[J]. Biotechnology Progress, 2019, 35(3): e2785.
161	丁宁, 李超, 白力, 等. 机械搅拌式动物细胞反应器不同桨型组合的CFD数值模拟与优化[J]. 生物工程学报, 2020, 36(6): 1209-1215.
	DING N, LI C, BAI L, et al. Numerical simulation and optimization of impeller combination used in stirred bioreactor[J]. Chinese journal of biotechnology, 2020, 36(6): 1209-1215.
162	LATTERMANN C, BÜCHS J. Microscale and miniscale fermentation and screening[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2015, 35: 1-6.
163	RIEDLBERGER P, WEUSTER-BOTZ D. New miniature stirred-tank bioreactors for parallel study of enzymatic biomass hydrolysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 106: 138-146.
164	WARR S. Ambr®15 microbioreactors for CHO cell cultivation[M/OL]// Methods in molecular biology: animal cell biotechnology. New York: Humana Press, 2020, 2095: 43-67 [2023-09-01]. .
165	ZHOU C J, XIE B Q, LI S W, et al. Rapid measurement of gas diffusivity in liquids using a tube-in-tube reactor with an unsteady-state strategy[J]. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(11): e17015.
166	ZWEIGERDT R, ANDRÉE B, KROPP C, et al. Bioreactors for expansion of pluripotent stem cells and their differentiation to cardiac cells[M/OL]//Bioreactors: design, operation and novel applications. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2016: 175-200 [2023-09-01]. .
167	ASK M, STOCKS S M. Aerobic bioreactors: condensers, evaporation rates, scale-up and scale-down[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2022, 44(7): 813-822.
168	NEUBAUER P, JUNNE S. Scale-up and scale-down methodologies for bioreactors[M/OL]// Bioreactors: design, operation and novel applications, New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2016: 323-354 [2023-09-01]. .
169	HEYMAN B, TULKE H, PUTRI S P, et al. Online monitoring of the respiratory quotient reveals metabolic phases during microaerobic 2,3-butanediol production with Bacillus licheniformis [J]. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2020, 20(3/4): 133-144.
170	LI X Y, YU C, YAO J M, et al. An online respiratory quotient-feedback strategy of feeding yeast extract for efficient arachidonic acid production by Mortierella alpina [J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2018, 5: 83.
171	庄英萍, 田锡炜, 张嗣良. 基于多尺度参数相关分析的细胞培养过程优化与放大[J]. 生物产业技术, 2018(1): 49-55.
	ZHUANG Y P, TIAN X W, ZHANG S L. Cell culture process optimization and scale-up based on multi-scale parameter related analysis[J]. Biotechnology & Business, 2018(1): 49-55.
172	储炬, 杭海峰, 庄英萍. 工业微生物发酵过程放大策略[J]. 生物产业技术, 2009(4): 68-72.
	CHU J, HANG H F, ZHUANG Y P. Scale-up strategy of industrial microbial fermentation process[J]. Biotechnology & Business, 2009(4): 68-72.
173	KUNERT R, REINHART D. Advances in recombinant antibody manufacturing[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100(8): 3451-3461.
174	SCARFF M, ARNOLD S A, HARVEY L M, et al. Near infrared spectroscopy for bioprocess monitoring and control: current status and future trends[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2006, 26(1): 17-39.
175	BUCKLEY K, RYDER A G. Applications of Raman spectroscopy in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: a short review[J]. Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 71(6): 1085-1116.
176	DE BEER T R M, BODSON C, DEJAEGHER B, et al. Raman spectroscopy as a process analytical technology (PAT) tool for the in-line monitoring and understanding of a powder blending process[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2008, 48(3): 772-779.
177	DE BEER T, BURGGRAEVE A, FONTEYNE M, et al. Near infrared and Raman spectroscopy for the in-process monitoring of pharmaceutical production processes[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2011, 417(1/2): 32-47.
178	JIANG J J, YANG G Y, MA F Q. Fluorescence coupling strategies in fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS) for ultrahigh-throughput screening of enzymes, metabolites, and antibodies[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2023, 66: 108173.
179	RUNNING J A, BANSAL K. Oxygen transfer rates in shaken culture vessels from Fernbach flasks to microtiter plates[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113(8): 1729-1735.

类型		典型装备	特点	主要不足	相关重要文献
单细胞	细胞自体	FACS、RACS、Namo cell、Single-cell printer	通量高，装备成熟且种类多	无法对细胞进行培养，细胞裂解物或外泌物无法作为检测指标	Sun et al.^[5] Gross et al.^[14] Zhang et al.^[39]
皮纳升级	微孔阵列	单细胞光导系统	通量高，装备类型多，可检测细胞裂解物和外泌物	芯片工艺复杂，操作烦琐	Lindstrom et al.^[48] Weibel et al.^[58]
	微液滴	FADS、RADS、IADS	通量高，装备类型多，可检测细胞裂解物和外泌物	存在液滴融合、内容物泄漏等风险	Jiang et al.^[178] Sanchez er al.^[63] Fu et al.^[102]
微升级	微液滴	MMC、MISS cell、Millidrop	细胞培养性能好，相关装备自动化和微型化	液滴稳定性易受影响，脂溶性物质易逃逸出液滴	Baraban et al.^[132] Jian et al.^[35] Jakiela et al.^[120]
微升级	96孔板	酶标仪、Bioscreen生长曲线测定仪	使用方便，适用性广	蒸发问题、边缘效应、孔距离小易交叉污染、溶氧受限	Mansoury et al.^[131] Duetz et al.^[144]
毫升级	深孔板	Biolector、酶标仪	使用方便，适用性广	孔间距较小易交叉污染	Klockner et al.^[150] Betts et al.^[142] Running et al.^[179]
	试管、摇瓶	Micro-24 bioreactor	使用方便，适用性广	相关自动化装备缺乏
	搅拌釜生物反应器	Ambr@15	使用范围广，过程参数易精确控制，利于后期放大	操作烦琐	Karimi et al.^[159] 丁宁，等^[161] Warr et al.^[164]
	微型管式生物反应器	EVOL cell	无气泡渗透供氧，内部流体剪切力低，易集成装备化开发	黏度大或含有颗粒的培养基以及易形成生物膜的菌株不适用	Yang et al.^[73] Li et al.^[75] Jian et al.^[135]
升级	搅拌釜生物反应器	多联罐、平行反应器以及其配套线检测装备（如BODS）	使用范围广，过程参数易精确控制，利于后期工艺放大	体积增大、搅拌釜反应器内部的物质混合和传递难度增加	Garcia-ochoa et al.^[143] Marques et al.^[147] Betts et al.^[157]

类型		典型装备	特点	主要不足	相关重要文献
单细胞	细胞自体	FACS、RACS、Namo cell、Single-cell printer	通量高，装备成熟且种类多	无法对细胞进行培养，细胞裂解物或外泌物无法作为检测指标	Sun et al.^[5] Gross et al.^[14] Zhang et al.^[39]
皮纳升级	微孔阵列	单细胞光导系统	通量高，装备类型多，可检测细胞裂解物和外泌物	芯片工艺复杂，操作烦琐	Lindstrom et al.^[48] Weibel et al.^[58]
	微液滴	FADS、RADS、IADS	通量高，装备类型多，可检测细胞裂解物和外泌物	存在液滴融合、内容物泄漏等风险	Jiang et al.^[178] Sanchez er al.^[63] Fu et al.^[102]
微升级	微液滴	MMC、MISS cell、Millidrop	细胞培养性能好，相关装备自动化和微型化	液滴稳定性易受影响，脂溶性物质易逃逸出液滴	Baraban et al.^[132] Jian et al.^[35] Jakiela et al.^[120]
微升级	96孔板	酶标仪、Bioscreen生长曲线测定仪	使用方便，适用性广	蒸发问题、边缘效应、孔距离小易交叉污染、溶氧受限	Mansoury et al.^[131] Duetz et al.^[144]
毫升级	深孔板	Biolector、酶标仪	使用方便，适用性广	孔间距较小易交叉污染	Klockner et al.^[150] Betts et al.^[142] Running et al.^[179]
	试管、摇瓶	Micro-24 bioreactor	使用方便，适用性广	相关自动化装备缺乏
	搅拌釜生物反应器	Ambr@15	使用范围广，过程参数易精确控制，利于后期放大	操作烦琐	Karimi et al.^[159] 丁宁，等^[161] Warr et al.^[164]
	微型管式生物反应器	EVOL cell	无气泡渗透供氧，内部流体剪切力低，易集成装备化开发	黏度大或含有颗粒的培养基以及易形成生物膜的菌株不适用	Yang et al.^[73] Li et al.^[75] Jian et al.^[135]
升级	搅拌釜生物反应器	多联罐、平行反应器以及其配套线检测装备（如BODS）	使用范围广，过程参数易精确控制，利于后期工艺放大	体积增大、搅拌釜反应器内部的物质混合和传递难度增加	Garcia-ochoa et al.^[143] Marques et al.^[147] Betts et al.^[157]

[1]	Yanyan YUAN, Huifang CHEN, Sihui YANG, Honghui WANG, Zhou NIE. Engineering artificial receptor cluster: chemical synthetic biology strategies and emerging applications [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(1): 53-76.
[2]	Jingyu ZHAO, Jian ZHANG, Qingsheng QI, Qian WANG. Research progress in biosensors based on bacterial two-component systems [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(1): 38-52.
[3]	Qian MENG, Cong YIN, Weiren HUANG. Tumor organoids and their research progress in synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(1): 191-201.
[4]	Duo LIU, Peiyuan LIU, Lianyue LI, Yaxin WANG, Yuhui CUI, Huimin XUE, Hanjie WANG. Design and synthesis of engineered extracellular vesicles and their biomedical applications [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(1): 154-173.
[5]	Han SUN, Jin LIU. Research progress and prospects in lipid metabolic engineering of eukaryotic microalgae [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(6): 1140-1160.
[6]	Huili SUN, Jinyu CUI, Guodong LUAN, Xuefeng LYU. Progress of cyanobacterial synthetic biotechnology for efficient light-driven carbon fixation and ethanol production [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(6): 1161-1177.
[7]	Xiongying YAN, Zhen WANG, Jiyun LOU, Haoyu ZHANG, Xingyu HUANG, Xia WANG, Shihui YANG. Progress in the construction of microbial cell factories for efficient biofuel production [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(6): 1082-1121.
[8]	Chenyue ZHANG, Yingqun MA, Xing WANG, Rongzhan FU, Jiwei HUANG, Xiufu HUA, Daidi FAN, Qiang FEI. Progress in the bioconversion of biogas into sustainable aviation fuel [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(6): 1246-1258.
[9]	Zhidian DIAO, Xixian WANG, Qing SUN, Jian XU, Bo MA. Advances and applications of single-cell Raman spectroscopy testing and sorting equipment [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 1020-1035.
[10]	Hui LU, Fangli ZHANG, Lei HUANG. Establishment of iBioFoundry for synthetic biology applications [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 877-891.
[11]	Zhonghu BAI, He REN, Jianqi NIE, Yang SUN. The recent progresses and applications of in-parallel fermentation technology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 904-915.
[12]	Yujie WU, Xinxin LIU, Jianhui LIU, Kaiguang Yang, Zhigang SUI, Lihua ZHANG, Yukui ZHANG. Research progress of strain screening and quantitative analysis of key molecules based on high-throughput liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 1000-1019.
[13]	Zhehui HU, Juan XU, Guangkai BIAN. Application of automated high-throughput technology in natural product biosynthesis [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 932-946.
[14]	Huan LIU, Qiu CUI. Advances and applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in screening of microbial strains [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(5): 980-999.
[15]	Yannan WANG, Yuhui SUN. Base editing technology and its application in microbial synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2023, 4(4): 720-737.

Progress in bioreactors and instruments for phenotype testing with synthetic biology research

合成生物学表型测试生物反应器及其装备化研究进展

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 179

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments