Zhaotao YAN2,3, Pengfei ZHOU4, Yangzhong WANG1, Xin ZHANG1, Wenyan XIE1, Chenfei TIAN1,2, Yong WANG2
Received:
2024-12-18
Revised:
2025-02-24
Published:
2025-02-24
Contact:
Chenfei TIAN, Yong WANG
颜钊涛2,3, 周鹏飞4, 汪阳忠1, 张鑫1, 谢雯燕1, 田晨菲1,2, 王勇2
通讯作者:
田晨菲,王勇
作者简介:
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhaotao YAN, Pengfei ZHOU, Yangzhong WANG, Xin ZHANG, Wenyan XIE, Chenfei TIAN, Yong WANG. Plant synthetic biology: New opportunities for large-scale culture of Plant Cells[J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095.
颜钊涛, 周鹏飞, 汪阳忠, 张鑫, 谢雯燕, 田晨菲, 王勇. 植物合成生物学:植物细胞大规模培养的新机遇[J]. 合成生物学, DOI: 10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://synbioj.cip.com.cn/EN/10.12211/2096-8280.2024-095
产品 | 物种 | 应用 | 制造商 | 参考 |
---|---|---|---|---|
紫杉醇 | Taxus chinensis L. | 药物,抗癌 | Phyton Biotech | https://phytonbiotech.com/about-pcf/ |
迷迭香酸 | Melissa axillaris L. | 药物,抗氧化 | Aethera Biotech | https://www.aetherabiotech.it/en/ |
可可粉 | Theobroma cacao L. | 食品成分 | California Cultured | https://www.cacultured.com/ |
黄烷醇 | Theobroma cacao L | 医药、保健品成分 | AyanaBio | www.ayanabio.com |
海茴香细胞提取物 | Crithmum maritimum L. | 化妆品成分,抗氧化 | Ancelbio | http://ancelbio.cn/ |
火绒草细胞提取物 | Leontopodium alpinum L. | 化妆品成分,抗皱 | Ancelbio | http://ancelbio.cn/ |
GBL-Skin1 | Glycyrrhiza uralensis L. | 化妆品原料,乳化剂 | Green Bioactives | https://greenbioactives.com/ |
白藜芦醇 | Graptoveria amethorum L. | 化妆品、保健品成分 | Bioharvest Science | https://bioharvest.com/ |
Elelyso | Daucus carota L. | 戈谢病治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
OPRX-100 | Daucus carota L. | 溃疡性结肠炎治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
PRX-102 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 法布里病治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
新城疫病毒 疫苗 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 新城疫病毒疫苗 | Dow AgroSciences | https://www.dow.com/ |
MOSS-FH | Physcomitrium patens L. | 溶血性尿毒症综合征治疗性蛋白 | Greenovation Biotech GmbH | http://www.greenovation.com/ developmental-pipeline.html |
Table 1 Commercial cases of mass production of plant cells
产品 | 物种 | 应用 | 制造商 | 参考 |
---|---|---|---|---|
紫杉醇 | Taxus chinensis L. | 药物,抗癌 | Phyton Biotech | https://phytonbiotech.com/about-pcf/ |
迷迭香酸 | Melissa axillaris L. | 药物,抗氧化 | Aethera Biotech | https://www.aetherabiotech.it/en/ |
可可粉 | Theobroma cacao L. | 食品成分 | California Cultured | https://www.cacultured.com/ |
黄烷醇 | Theobroma cacao L | 医药、保健品成分 | AyanaBio | www.ayanabio.com |
海茴香细胞提取物 | Crithmum maritimum L. | 化妆品成分,抗氧化 | Ancelbio | http://ancelbio.cn/ |
火绒草细胞提取物 | Leontopodium alpinum L. | 化妆品成分,抗皱 | Ancelbio | http://ancelbio.cn/ |
GBL-Skin1 | Glycyrrhiza uralensis L. | 化妆品原料,乳化剂 | Green Bioactives | https://greenbioactives.com/ |
白藜芦醇 | Graptoveria amethorum L. | 化妆品、保健品成分 | Bioharvest Science | https://bioharvest.com/ |
Elelyso | Daucus carota L. | 戈谢病治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
OPRX-100 | Daucus carota L. | 溃疡性结肠炎治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
PRX-102 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 法布里病治疗性蛋白 | Protalix BioThera | http://protalix.comhttps://clinicaltrials.gov |
新城疫病毒 疫苗 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 新城疫病毒疫苗 | Dow AgroSciences | https://www.dow.com/ |
MOSS-FH | Physcomitrium patens L. | 溶血性尿毒症综合征治疗性蛋白 | Greenovation Biotech GmbH | http://www.greenovation.com/ developmental-pipeline.html |
植物物种 | 拉丁名 | 蛋白名称 | 细胞材料 | 产量 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 人骨形态发生蛋白2(BMP2) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 21.5 μg/mL培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 人类生长激素(hGH) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 57 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 合成牛胰蛋白酶原(Synthetic bovine trypsinogen) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 15 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 酸性葡萄糖苷酶(GAA) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 37 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 血管内皮生长因子(VEGFs) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 19 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 包膜糖蛋白(Envelope glycoprotein) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 18.5 μg/g | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 贝伐单抗(Bevacizumab monoclonal antibody) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 160.7–242.8 mg/kg | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 人抗胰蛋白酶(Human α1-antitrypsin) | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 34.7 mg/L培养液 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 人生长激素(Human growth hormone) | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 5.2%总可溶蛋白 | [ |
Table 2 Heterologous synthesis of recombinant proteins in plant cells
植物物种 | 拉丁名 | 蛋白名称 | 细胞材料 | 产量 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 人骨形态发生蛋白2(BMP2) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 21.5 μg/mL培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 人类生长激素(hGH) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 57 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 合成牛胰蛋白酶原(Synthetic bovine trypsinogen) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 15 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 酸性葡萄糖苷酶(GAA) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 37 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 血管内皮生长因子(VEGFs) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 19 mg/L培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 包膜糖蛋白(Envelope glycoprotein) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 18.5 μg/g | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 贝伐单抗(Bevacizumab monoclonal antibody) | 水稻愈伤组织细胞 | 160.7–242.8 mg/kg | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 人抗胰蛋白酶(Human α1-antitrypsin) | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 34.7 mg/L培养液 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 人生长激素(Human growth hormone) | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 5.2%总可溶蛋白 | [ |
物种 | 外植体部位 | 类型 | 激素 | 培养基及PH | 周期 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | 胚乳 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 1.0 mg/L 6BA | N6培养基 | 6个月 | [ |
葡萄 | 叶片 | 愈伤组织 | 0.05 mg/L NAA; 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D; 2.0 mg/L KT | B5培养基 | 21天 | [ |
胡萝卜 | 茎段 | 愈伤组织 | 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D | MS培养基 | 14天 | [ |
红豆杉 | 胚乳 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/L 6BA | B5培养基 | 15天 | [ |
人参 | 根部 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 0.1 mg/L KT | MS培养基 | 90天 | [ |
地黄 | 根部 | 形成层干细胞 | 2.0 mg/L NAA; 2.0 mg/L 6BA | MS培养基 | 14天 | [ |
Table 3 Common induction conditions of plant cell lines in vitro
物种 | 外植体部位 | 类型 | 激素 | 培养基及PH | 周期 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | 胚乳 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 1.0 mg/L 6BA | N6培养基 | 6个月 | [ |
葡萄 | 叶片 | 愈伤组织 | 0.05 mg/L NAA; 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D; 2.0 mg/L KT | B5培养基 | 21天 | [ |
胡萝卜 | 茎段 | 愈伤组织 | 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D | MS培养基 | 14天 | [ |
红豆杉 | 胚乳 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/L 6BA | B5培养基 | 15天 | [ |
人参 | 根部 | 愈伤组织 | 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D; 0.1 mg/L KT | MS培养基 | 90天 | [ |
地黄 | 根部 | 形成层干细胞 | 2.0 mg/L NAA; 2.0 mg/L 6BA | MS培养基 | 14天 | [ |
Fig.2 Strategies for increasing plant cell yield from "black box" to "white box"In the "Black box", the mechanism of the inducer to increase the yield of the target product has not been fully defined; In the "White box", the yield of target products can be increased precisely with different gene circuits[89]
植物 物种 | 拉丁名 | 改造策略 | 细胞材料 | 化合物 类别 | 作用效果 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山葡萄 | Vitis amurensis Rupr. | 过表达VaCPK29 | 悬浮细胞 | 多酚类 | 白藜芦醇1.39 mg/L培养液 | [ |
柑橘 | CitrusreticulataL. | 过表达CsMADS6、PSY、PDS和CCD1 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 类胡萝卜素 | 类胡萝卜素23 µg/g DW | [ |
加州 藜芦 | Veratrum californicum var. | 过表达VnOSC1 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 生物碱 | 环巴胺6.14 mg/g DW | [ |
红豆杉 | Taxus baccata L. | 过表达NINV | 悬浮细胞 | 二萜类 | 紫杉醇94 μg/g FW | [ |
红豆杉 | Taxus baccata L. | 过表达BAPT、DBTNBT | 悬浮细胞 | 二萜类 | 紫杉醇310 mg/L培养液 | [ |
灌木状辣椒 | Capsicum frutescens L. | 过表达VpVAN | 悬浮细胞 | 芳香族化合物 | 香兰素 573.39±120.70 µg/g组织 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达转录因子AmRos1和AmDel | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 黄酮类 | 花青素30 mg/g DW | [ |
甜菜 | Beta vulgaris L. | 过表达VpVAN | 毛状根 | 芳香族化合物 | 香兰素0.0430 ±0.003 mg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达HCHL | 悬浮细胞 | 黄酮类 | 花青素75.4±6.1 µmol/g FW | [ |
竹 | Phyllostachys nigra L. | 过表达PpHCH | 悬浮细胞 | 酚类 | 4-羟基苯甲醇1.7 g/L培养液 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达CqCYP76AD1、CqDODA、CqCDOPA5GT和CqAmaSy | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 苷类 | 苋菜苷13.67±4.13 µM;甜菜苷26.60±1.53 µM | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达CqCYP76AD1-1和CqDODA-1 | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 类黄酮 | 甜菜苷19.53±8.60 µM | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达VoGES | 悬浮细胞 | 单萜类 | 香叶醇16 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达PgDDS | 悬浮细胞 | 三萜类 | 达玛烯二醇-II 573 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达PgDDS 和 CYP716A47 | 悬浮细胞 | 三萜类 | 原人参二醇980.9 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | CRISPRi抑制NtC4H | 悬浮细胞 | 苯丙 素类 | 绿原酸1799.69 ng/mL培养液; 乔松酮384.19 ng/mL培养液; 柚皮素597.53 ng/mL培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 修饰近靶顺式作用元件,激活PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1启动子 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 类胡萝卜素 | 八氢番茄红素7.13 µg/g DW | [ |
水飞蓟 | Silybum marianum L. | 过表达STS | 悬浮细胞 | 多酚类 | 白藜芦醇50 ng/g FW | [ |
连翘 | Forsythia koreana L. | 过表达CYP81Q1;RNAi抑制UGT71A18和PLR | 悬浮细胞 | 木质素 | 芝麻素10.83±0.35 µg/g DW | [ |
Table 4 Cases of secondary metabolites synthesized by plant cells
植物 物种 | 拉丁名 | 改造策略 | 细胞材料 | 化合物 类别 | 作用效果 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山葡萄 | Vitis amurensis Rupr. | 过表达VaCPK29 | 悬浮细胞 | 多酚类 | 白藜芦醇1.39 mg/L培养液 | [ |
柑橘 | CitrusreticulataL. | 过表达CsMADS6、PSY、PDS和CCD1 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 类胡萝卜素 | 类胡萝卜素23 µg/g DW | [ |
加州 藜芦 | Veratrum californicum var. | 过表达VnOSC1 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 生物碱 | 环巴胺6.14 mg/g DW | [ |
红豆杉 | Taxus baccata L. | 过表达NINV | 悬浮细胞 | 二萜类 | 紫杉醇94 μg/g FW | [ |
红豆杉 | Taxus baccata L. | 过表达BAPT、DBTNBT | 悬浮细胞 | 二萜类 | 紫杉醇310 mg/L培养液 | [ |
灌木状辣椒 | Capsicum frutescens L. | 过表达VpVAN | 悬浮细胞 | 芳香族化合物 | 香兰素 573.39±120.70 µg/g组织 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达转录因子AmRos1和AmDel | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 黄酮类 | 花青素30 mg/g DW | [ |
甜菜 | Beta vulgaris L. | 过表达VpVAN | 毛状根 | 芳香族化合物 | 香兰素0.0430 ±0.003 mg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达HCHL | 悬浮细胞 | 黄酮类 | 花青素75.4±6.1 µmol/g FW | [ |
竹 | Phyllostachys nigra L. | 过表达PpHCH | 悬浮细胞 | 酚类 | 4-羟基苯甲醇1.7 g/L培养液 | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达CqCYP76AD1、CqDODA、CqCDOPA5GT和CqAmaSy | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 苷类 | 苋菜苷13.67±4.13 µM;甜菜苷26.60±1.53 µM | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达CqCYP76AD1-1和CqDODA-1 | BY-2悬浮细胞 | 类黄酮 | 甜菜苷19.53±8.60 µM | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达VoGES | 悬浮细胞 | 单萜类 | 香叶醇16 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达PgDDS | 悬浮细胞 | 三萜类 | 达玛烯二醇-II 573 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 过表达PgDDS 和 CYP716A47 | 悬浮细胞 | 三萜类 | 原人参二醇980.9 µg/g DW | [ |
烟草 | Nicotiana tabacum L. | CRISPRi抑制NtC4H | 悬浮细胞 | 苯丙 素类 | 绿原酸1799.69 ng/mL培养液; 乔松酮384.19 ng/mL培养液; 柚皮素597.53 ng/mL培养液 | [ |
水稻 | Oryza sativa L. | 修饰近靶顺式作用元件,激活PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1启动子 | 愈伤组织细胞 | 类胡萝卜素 | 八氢番茄红素7.13 µg/g DW | [ |
水飞蓟 | Silybum marianum L. | 过表达STS | 悬浮细胞 | 多酚类 | 白藜芦醇50 ng/g FW | [ |
连翘 | Forsythia koreana L. | 过表达CYP81Q1;RNAi抑制UGT71A18和PLR | 悬浮细胞 | 木质素 | 芝麻素10.83±0.35 µg/g DW | [ |
1 | MURTHY H N, LEE E J, PAEK K, 2014. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: strategies and approaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation[J/OL]. . DOI:10.1007/s11240-014-0467-7 . |
2 | NAGATA T, KUMAGAI F, 1999. Plant cell biology through the window of the highly synchronized tobacco BY-2 cell line[J].Methods in Cell Science, 1999, 21(2-3):123-127.DOI:10.1023/A:1009832822096 . |
3 | RAHMAN Z A, SEMAN Z A, OTHMAN A N, et al. 2021. Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration of Malaysian indicariceMR219 using anther culture[J/OL]. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 31: 101865. DOI:10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101865 . |
4 | LI Y L, HUANG S W, ZHANG J Y, et al. 2016. A protocol of homozygous haploid callus induction from endosperm of Taxus chinensis Rehd. var. mairei[J/OL]. SpringerPlus, 5(1): 659. DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-2320-4 . |
5 | OBAE S G, KLANDORF H, WEST T P, 2011. Growth characteristics and ginsenosides production of in vitro tissues of American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius L.[J/OL]. HortScience, 46(8): 1136-1140. DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.46.8.1136 . |
6 | LE V, SUKHIKH A, LARICHEV T, et al. 2023. Isolation of the Main Biologically Active Substances and Phytochemical Analysis of Ginkgo biloba Callus Culture Extracts[J/OL]. Molecules, 28(4): 1560. DOI:10.3390/molecules28041560 . |
7 | EIBL R, MEIER P, STUTZ I, et al. 2018. Plant cell culture technology in the cosmetics and food industries: current state and future trends[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102(20): 8661-8675. DOI:10.1007/s00253-018-9279-8 . |
8 | DABUWAR BENJAMIN E, ADAMU ISHAKU G, ANDREW PEINGURTA F, et al. 2019. Callus Culture for the Production of Therapeutic Compounds[J/OL]. American Journal of Plant Biology, 4(4): 76. DOI:10.11648/j.ajpb.20190404.14 . |
9 | NETT R S, LAU W, SATTELY E S, 2020. Discovery and engineering of colchicine alkaloid biosynthesis[J/OL]. Nature, 584(7819): 148-153. DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2546-8 . |
10 | MAEDA H A, 2019. Harnessing evolutionary diversification of primary metabolism for plant synthetic biology[J/OL]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 294(45): 16549-16566. DOI:10.1074/jbc.REV119.006132 . |
11 | SCHMIDHALTER D R, MEYER H P, 2014. Industrial scale suspension culture of living cells[M/OL]. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9783527683321 . |
12 | DIRISALA V R, NAIR R R, SRIRAMA K, et al. 2017. Recombinant pharmaceutical protein production in plants: unraveling the therapeutic potential of molecular pharming[J/OL]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39(1): 18. DOI:10.1007/s11738-016-2315-3 . |
13 | B S S A A, B J E R, B D M C, et al. Next-generation metabolic engineering approaches towards development of plant cell suspension cultures as specialized metabolite producing biofactories[J].Biotechnology Advances, 2020, 45.DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107635 . |
14 | HUSSAIN Md S, FAREED S, ANSARI S, et al. 2012. Current approaches toward production of secondary plant metabolites[J/OL]. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences, 4(1): 10. DOI:10.4103/0975-7406.92725 . |
15 | RAMIREZ-ESTRADA K, VIDAL-LIMON H, HIDALGO D, et al. 2016. Elicitation, an Effective Strategy for the Biotechnological Production of Bioactive High-Added Value Compounds in Plant Cell Factories[J/OL]. Molecules, 21(2): 182. DOI:10.3390/molecules21020182 . |
16 | NAGEGOWDA D A, GUPTA P, 2020. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and metabolic engineering of plant specialized terpenoids[J/OL]. Plant Science, 294: 110457. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110457 . |
17 | FONSECA-SANTOS B, CORRÊA M A, CHORILLI M, 2015. Sustainability, natural and organic cosmetics: consumer, products, efficacy, toxicological and regulatory considerations[J/OL]. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 51(1): 17-26. DOI:10.1590/S1984-82502015000100002 . |
18 | GOMORD V, FAYE L, 2004. Posttranslational modification of therapeutic proteins in plants[J/OL]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7(2): 171-181. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.01.015 . |
19 | GHAG S B, ADKI V S, GANAPATHI T R, et al. 2021. Plant Platforms for Efficient Heterologous Protein Production[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 26(4): 546-567. DOI:10.1007/s12257-020-0374-1 . |
20 | SINGH A A, PILLAY P, TSEKOA T L, 2021. Engineering Approaches in Plant Molecular Farming for Global Health[J/OL]. Vaccines, 9(11): 1270. DOI:10.3390/vaccines9111270 . |
21 | WU J, ZHANG J, HAO X, et al. 2024. Establishment of an efficient callus transient transformation system for Vitis vinifera cv. 'Chardonnay'[J/OL]. Protoplasma, 261(2): 351-366. DOI:10.1007/s00709-023-01901-2 . |
22 | CORTESE E, CARRARETTO L, BALDAN B, et al. 2021. Arabidopsis Photosynthetic and Heterotrophic Cell Suspension Cultures [J].Methods in Molecular Biology,2021,2200167-185. |
23 | LI B, TAKAHASHI D, KAWAMURA Y, et al. 2020. Plasma membrane proteome analyses of Arabidopsis thaliana suspension-cultured cells during cold or ABA treatment: Relationship with freezing tolerance and growth phase[J/OL]. Journal of Proteomics, 211: 103528. DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103528 . |
24 | SEGEČOVÁ A, ČERVENÝ J, ROITSCH T, 2018. Advancement of the cultivation and upscaling of photoautotrophic suspension cultures using Chenopodium rubrum as a case study[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 135(1): 37-51. DOI:10.1007/s11240-018-1441-6 . |
25 | THORPE T A, 2007. History of plant tissue culture[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 37(2): 169-180. DOI:10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3 . |
26 | SRBA M, ČERNÍKOVÁ A, OPATRNÝ Z, 等, 2016. Practical guidelines for the characterization of tobacco BY-2 cell lines[J/OL]. Biologia plantarum, 60(1): 13-24. DOI:10.1007/s10535-015-0573-3 . |
27 | IKEDA N, KAMIMURA M, UESUGI K, 等, 2024. Choline chloride and N-allylglycine promote plant growth by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis[J/OL]. |
Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 89(1): 51-61. DOI:10.1093/bbb/zbae145 . | |
28 | LEE E K, JIN Y W, PARK J H, et al. 2010. Cultured cambial meristematic cells as a source of plant natural products[J/OL]. Nature Biotechnology, 28(11): 1213-1217. DOI:10.1038/nbt.1693 . |
29 | ZHOU P, LI H, LIN Y, et al. 2023. Omics analyses of Rehmannia glutinosa dedifferentiated and cambial meristematic cells reveal mechanisms of catalpol and indole alkaloid biosynthesis[J/OL]. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1): 463. DOI:10.1186/s12870-023-04478-3 . |
30 | PATRA N, SRIVASTAVA A K, 2016. Artemisinin production by plant hairy root cultures in gas- and liquid-phase bioreactors[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 35(1): 143-153. DOI:10.1007/s00299-015-1875-9 . |
31 | HA L T, PAWLICKI-JULLIAN N, PILLON-LEQUART M, et al. 2016. Hairy root cultures of Panax vietnamensis, a promising approach for the production of ocotillol-type ginsenosides[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 126(1): 93-103. DOI:10.1007/s11240-016-0980-y . |
32 | PERASSOLO M, CARDILLO A B, MUGAS M L, et al. 2017. Enhancement of anthraquinone production and release by combination of culture medium selection and methyl jasmonate elicitation in hairy root cultures of Rubia tinctorum [J/OL]. Industrial Crops and Products, 105: 124-132. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.010 . |
33 | GENGENBACH B B, KEIL L L, OPDENSTEINEN P, et al. 2019. Comparison of microbial and transient expression (tobacco plants and plant‐cell packs) for the production and purification of the anticancer mistletoe lectin viscumin[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 116(9): 2236-2249. DOI:10.1002/bit.27076 . |
34 | KIM T G, BAEK M Y, LEE E K, et al. 2008. Expression of human growth hormone in transgenic rice cell suspension culture[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 27(5): 885-891. DOI:10.1007/s00299-008-0514-0 . |
35 | KIM N S, YU H Y, CHUNG N D, et al. 2011. Production of functional recombinant bovine trypsin in transgenic rice cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. Protein Expression and Purification, 76(1): 121-126. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2010.10.007 . |
36 | NGUYEN T M, WU P Y, CHANG C H, et al. 2024. High-yield BMP2 expression in rice cells via CRISPR and endogenous αAmy3 promoter[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 108(1): 206. DOI:10.1007/s00253-024-13054-0 . |
37 | RATNER M, 2010. Genzyme resumes shipping as Sanofi-aventis hovers[J/OL]. Nature Biotechnology, 28(10): 994-994. DOI:10.1038/nbt1010-994c . |
38 | MIHALIAK C A, FANTON M J, MCMILLEN J K. Preparation of vaccine master cell lines using recombinant plant suspension cultures:US2006/041305[P].WO 2007055894A2[2024-12-14].DOI:US7964403 B2 . |
39 | HANANIA U, ARIEL T, TEKOAH Y, et al. 2017. Establishment of a tobacco BY2 cell line devoid of plant‐specific xylose and fucose as a platform for the production of biotherapeutic proteins[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(9): 1120-1129. DOI:10.1111/pbi.12702 . |
40 | JUNG J W, KIM N S, JANG S H, et al. 2016. Production and characterization of recombinant human acid α-glucosidase in transgenic rice cell suspension culture[J/OL]. Journal of Biotechnology, 226: 44-53. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.031 . |
41 | CHUNG N D, KIM N S, GIAP D V, et al. 2014. Production of functional human vascular endothelial growth factor165 in transgenic rice cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 63: 58-63. DOI:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.05.007 . |
42 | KIM T G, KIM M Y, TIEN N Q D, et al. 2014. Dengue Virus E Glycoprotein Production in Transgenic Rice Callus[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 56(12): 1069-1078. DOI:10.1007/s12033-014-9787-4 . |
43 | CHEN L, YANG X, LUO D, et al. 2016. Efficient Production of a Bioactive Bevacizumab Monoclonal Antibody Using the 2A Self-cleavage Peptide in Transgenic Rice Callus[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7[2024-12-14]. . DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01156 . |
44 | ZHANG N, WRIGHT T, CARAWAY P, et al. 2019. Enhanced secretion of human α1-antitrypsin expressed with a novel glycosylation module in tobacco BY-2 cell culture[J/OL]. Bioengineered, 10(1): 87-97. DOI:10.1080/21655979.2019.1604037 . |
45 | XU J, OKADA S, TAN L, et al. 2010. Human growth hormone expressed in tobacco cells as an arabinogalactan-protein fusion glycoprotein has a prolonged serum life[J/OL]. Transgenic Research, 19(5): 849-867. DOI:10.1007/s11248-010-9367-8 . |
46 | HUANG T K, MCDONALD K A, 2012. Bioreactor systems for in vitro production of foreign proteins using plant cell cultures[J/OL]. Biotechnology Advances, 30(2): 398-409. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.016 . |
47 | ALCALDE M A, PEREZ-MATAS E, ESCRICH A, et al. 2022. Biotic Elicitors in Adventitious and Hairy Root Cultures: A Review from 2010 to 2022[J/OL]. Molecules, 27(16): 5253. DOI:10.3390/molecules27165253 . |
48 | CHODISETTI B, RAO K, GANDI S, et al. 2013. Improved gymnemic acid production in the suspension cultures of Gymnema sylvestre through biotic elicitation[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 7(4): 519-525. DOI:10.1007/s11816-013-0290-3 . |
49 | LIANG C, CHEN C, ZHOU P, et al. 2018. Effect of Aspergillus flavus Fungal Elicitor on the Production of Terpenoid Indole Alkaloids in Catharanthus roseus Cambial Meristematic Cells[J/OL]. Molecules, 23(12): 3276. DOI:10.3390/molecules23123276 . |
50 | NAMDEO A, 2007. Plant cell elicitation for production of secondary metabolites: A review[J/OL]. . |
51 | SKOOG F, MILLER C O.Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro.[J].Cheminform, 1996, 27(21):118.DOI:10.1002/chin.199621020 . |
52 | EFFERTH T, 2019. Biotechnology Applications of Plant Callus Cultures[J/OL]. Engineering, 5(1): 50-59. DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.006 . |
53 | ZHANG Z, SUN Y, LI Y, 2020. Plant rejuvenation: from phenotypes to mechanisms[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 39(10): 1249-1262. DOI:10.1007/s00299-020-02577-1 . |
54 | TAKEDA T, MIZUKAMI M, MATSUOKA H, 2008. Characterization of two-step direct somatic embryogenesis in carrot [J/OL]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 38(2): 206-211. DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2007.07.006 . |
55 | LU Y, LIU Z, LYU M, et al. 2019. Characterization of JsWOX1 and JsWOX4 during Callus and Root Induction in the Shrub Species Jasminum sambac [J/OL]. Plants, 8(4): 79. DOI:10.3390/plants8040079 . |
56 | FENG M, ZHANG A, NGUYEN V, et al. 2024. A conserved graft formation process in Norway spruce and Arabidopsis identifies the PAT gene family as central regulators of wound healing[J/OL]. Nature Plants, 10(1): 53-65. DOI:10.1038/s41477-023-01568-w . |
57 | CAO H, ZHANG X, LI F, et al. 2024. Glucosinolate O-methyltransferase mediated callus formation and affected ROS homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana [J/OL]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 30(1): 109-121. DOI:10.1007/s12298-023-01409-2 . |
58 | SU Y H, TANG L P, ZHAO X Y, et al. 2021. Plant cell totipotency: Insights into cellular reprogramming[J/OL]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63(1): 228-243. DOI:10.1111/jipb.12972 . |
59 | XU C, CHANG P, GUO S, et al. 2023. Transcriptional activation by WRKY23 and derepression by removal of bHLH041 coordinately establish callus pluripotency in Arabidopsis regeneration[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 36(1): 158-173. DOI:10.1093/plcell/koad255 . |
60 | YANG W, ZHAI H, WU F, et al. 2024. Peptide REF1 is a local wound signal promoting plant regeneration[J/OL]. Cell, 187(12): 3024-3038.e14. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.040 . |
61 | 张博,马永硕,尚轶,等.植物合成生物学研究进展[J].合成生物学, 2020, 1(2):20.DOI:10.12211/2096-8280.2020-016 . |
ZHANG B, MA Y S, SHANG Y, et al. Advances in plant synthetic biology [J]. Synthetic Biology, 2020, 1(2):20.DOI:10.12211/2096-8280.2020-016 . | |
62 | YOOSEFZADEH-NAJAFABADI M, TORABI S, TULPAN D, et al. 2021. Genome-Wide Association Studies of Soybean Yield-Related Hyperspectral Reflectance Bands Using Machine Learning-Mediated Data Integration Methods[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 777028. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.777028 . |
63 | RAMEZANPOUR M R, FARAJPOUR M, 2022. Application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm to predict and optimize greenhouse banana fruit yield through nitrogen, potassium and magnesium[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 17(2): e0264040. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264040 . |
64 | HESAMI M, ALIZADEH M, JONES A M P, et al. 2022. Machine learning: its challenges and opportunities in plant system biology[J/OL]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 106(9-10): 3507-3530. DOI:10.1007/s00253-022-11963-6 . |
65 | JAFARI M, DANESHVAR M H, 2023. Prediction and optimization of indirect shoot regeneration of Passiflora caerulea using machine learning and optimization algorithms[J/OL]. BMC Biotechnology, 23(1): 27. DOI:10.1186/s12896-023-00796-4 . |
66 | FALLAH ZIARANI M, TOHIDFAR M, NAVVABI M, 2022. Modeling and optimizing in vitro percentage and speed callus induction of carrot via Multilayer Perceptron-Single point discrete GA and radial basis function[J/OL]. BMC Biotechnology, 22(1): 34. DOI:10.1186/s12896-022-00764-4 . |
67 | REZAEI H, MIRZAIE-ASL A, ABDOLLAHI M R, et al. 2023. Enhancing petunia tissue culture efficiency with machine learning: A pathway to improved callogenesis[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 18(11): e0293754. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293754 . |
68 | GRIGOREVA E I, SIDORCHUK Y V, DEINEKO E V, 2022. Aggregates' Formation in Higher Plants' Cell Culture: The Role of Cell Wall Components[J/OL]. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 12(S2): S182-S194. DOI:10.1134/S2079086422080023 . |
69 | KOLEWE M E, HENSON M A, ROBERTS S C, 2011. Analysis of aggregate size as a process variable affecting paclitaxel accumulation in Taxus suspension cultures[J/OL]. Biotechnology Progress, 27(5): 1365-1372. DOI:10.1002/btpr.655 . |
70 | PATIL R A, KOLEWE M E, ROBERTS S C, 2013. Cellular aggregation is a key parameter associated with long term variability in paclitaxel accumulation in Taxus suspension cultures[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 112(3): 303-310. DOI:10.1007/s11240-012-0237-3 . |
71 | NYON M P, DU L, TSENG C T K, et al. 2018. Engineering a stable CHO cell line for the expression of a MERS-coronavirus vaccine antigen[J/OL]. Vaccine, 36(14): 1853-1862. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.065 . |
72 | BISSINGER T, WU Y, MARICHAL‐GALLARDO P, et al. 2021. Towards integrated production of an influenza A vaccine candidate with MDCK suspension cells[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(10): 3996-4013. DOI:10.1002/bit.27876 . |
73 | SHEN C F, GUILBAULT C, LI X, et al. 2019. Development of suspension adapted Vero cell culture process technology for production of viral vaccines[J/OL]. Vaccine, 37(47): 6996-7002. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.003 . |
74 | LEE N, SHIN J, PARK J H, et al. 2016. Targeted Gene Deletion Using DNA-Free RNA-Guided Cas9 Nuclease Accelerates Adaptation of CHO Cells to Suspension Culture[J/OL]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 5(11): 1211-1219. DOI:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00249 . |
75 | MOHNEN D, 2008. Pectin structure and biosynthesis[J/OL]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11(3): 266-277. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.006 . |
76 | YEH B J, RUTIGLIANO R J, DEB A, et al. 2007. Rewiring cellular morphology pathways with synthetic guanine nucleotide exchange factors[J/OL]. Nature, 447(7144): 596-600. DOI:10.1038/nature05851 . |
77 | GLEBA Y Y, TUSÉ D, GIRITCH A, 2013. Plant Viral Vectors for Delivery by Agrobacterium [M/OL]//PALMER K, GLEBA Y. Plant Viral Vectors: 375. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 155-192 [2024-12-14]. . DOI:10.1007/82_2013_352 . |
78 | THIELE I, PALSSON B. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction[J]. Nature Protocols, 2010, 5(1):93-121.DOI:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 . |
79 | JIANG T, ZHANG Y, ZUO G, et al. 2024. Transcription factor PgNAC72 activates DAMMARENEDIOL SYNTHASE expression to promote ginseng saponin biosynthesis[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 195(4): 2952-2969. DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiae202 . |
80 | ZHAO Y, CHENG P, LIU Y, et al. 2024. A highly efficient soybean transformation system using GRF3-GIF1 chimeric protein[J/OL]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology: jipb.13767. DOI:10.1111/jipb.13767 . |
81 | JHA P, KUMAR V, 2018. BABY BOOM (BBM): a candidate transcription factor gene in plant biotechnology[J/OL]. Biotechnology Letters, 40(11-12): 1467-1475. DOI:10.1007/s10529-018-2613-5 . |
82 | LOWE K, WU E, WANG N, et al. 2016. Morphogenic Regulators Baby boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 28(9): 1998-2015. DOI:10.1105/tpc.16.00124 . |
83 | KOBERCOVÁ E, SRBA M, FISCHER L, 2023. Sulfadiazine and phosphinothricin selection systems optimised for the transformation of tobacco BY-2 cells[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 42(3): 535-548. DOI:10.1007/s00299-022-02975-7 . |
84 | HE Y, ZHANG T, SUN H, et al. 2020. A reporter for noninvasively monitoring gene expression and plant transformation[J/OL]. Horticulture Research, 7(1): 152. DOI:10.1038/s41438-020-00390-1 . |
85 | TIAN C, ZHANG Y, LI J, et al. 2022. Benchmarking Intrinsic Promoters and Terminators for Plant Synthetic Biology Research[J/OL]. BioDesign Research, 2022: 9834989. DOI:10.34133/2022/9834989 . |
86 | YAMASAKI S, SUZUKI A, YAMANO Y, et al. 2018. Identification of 5′-untranslated regions that function as effective translational enhancers in monocotyledonous plant cells using a novel method of genome-wide analysis[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology, 35(4): 365-373. DOI:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.18.0903a . |
87 | HUANG L F, TAN C C, YEH J F, et al. 2015. Efficient Secretion of Recombinant Proteins from RiceSuspension-Cultured Cells Modulated by the Choice of Signal Peptide[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 10(10): e0140812. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140812 . |
88 | WOJCIK S, KRIECHBAUMER V, 2021. Go your own way: membrane-targeting sequences[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 185(3): 608-618. DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiaa058 . |
89 | SELMA S, SANMARTÍN N, ESPINOSA‐RUIZ A, et al. 2022. Custom-made design of metabolite composition in N. benthamiana leaves using CRISPR activators[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20(8): 1578-1590. DOI:10.1111/pbi.13834 . |
90 | PEREZ‐MATAS E, HIDALGO‐MARTINEZ D, MOYANO E, et al. 2024. Overexpression of BAPT and DBTNBT genes in Taxus baccata in vitro cultures to enhance the biotechnological production of paclitaxel[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 22(1): 233-247. DOI:10.1111/pbi.14182 . |
91 | ZUO A, HE D, SUN C, et al. 2024. Integration of induction, system optimization and genetic transformation in Veratrum californicum var. vitro cultures to enhance the production of cyclopamine and veratramine[J/OL]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 216: 109087. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109087 . |
92 | CHU M, PEDREÑO M A, ALBURQUERQUE N, et al. 2017. A new strategy to enhance the biosynthesis of trans-resveratrol by overexpressing stilbene synthase gene in elicited Vitis vinifera cell cultures[J/OL]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 113: 141-148. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.02.006 . |
93 | LI J, MUTANDA I, WANG K, et al. 2019. Chloroplastic metabolic engineering coupled with isoprenoid pool enhancement for committed taxanes biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 10(1): 4850. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-12879-y . |
94 | SHI Y, WANG D, LI R, et al. 2021. Engineering yeast subcellular compartments for increased production of the lipophilic natural products ginsenosides[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 67: 104-111. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.06.002 . |
95 | KARLSON C K S, MOHD NOOR S N, KHALID N, et al. 2022. CRISPRi-Mediated Down-Regulation of the Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Gene Enhances the Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum[J/OL]. Biology, 11(8): 1127. DOI:10.3390/biology11081127 . |
96 | ZHANG W, ZHANG J, FAN Y, 等, 2024. RNA sequencing analysis reveals PgbHLH28 as the key regulator in response to methyl jasmonate-induced saponin accumulation in Platycodon grandiflorus[J/OL]. Horticulture Research, 11(5): uhae058. DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae058 . |
97 | KARPPINEN K, LAFFERTY D J, ALBERT N W, 等, 2021. MYBA and MYBPA transcription factors co‐regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in blue‐coloured berries[J/OL]. New Phytologist, 232(3): 1350-1367. DOI:10.1111/nph.17669 . |
98 | APPELHAGEN I, WULFF-VESTER A K, WENDELL M, et al. 2018. Colour bio-factories: Towards scale-up production of anthocyanins in plant cell cultures[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 48: 218-232. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.06.004 . |
99 | JIA E, LI H, HE F, et al. 2024. Metabolic engineering of artificially modified transcription factor SmMYB36-VP16 for high-level production of tanshinones and phenolic acids[J/OL]. Metabolic Engineering, 86: 29-40. DOI:10.1016/j.ymben.2024.08.004 . |
100 | GE C, YU Z, SHENG H, et al. 2022. Redesigning regulatory components of quorum-sensing system for diverse metabolic control[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 13(1): 2182. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-29933-x . |
101 | WU J, BAO M, DUAN X, et al. 2020. Developing a pathway-independent and full-autonomous global resource allocation strategy to dynamically switching phenotypic states[J/OL]. Nature Communications, 11(1): 5521. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19432-2 . |
102 | KURZBACH E, STRIEKER M, WITTSTOCK U, 2022. Production of benzylglucosinolate in genetically engineered carrot suspension cultures[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology, 39(3): 241-250. DOI:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.0509a . |
103 | VASILEV N, SCHMITZ C, GRÖMPING U, et al. 2014. Assessment of Cultivation Factors that Affect Biomass and Geraniol Production in Transgenic Tobacco Cell Suspension Cultures[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 9(8): e104620. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0104620 . |
104 | CHUN J H, ADHIKARI P B, PARK S B, et al. 2015. Production of the dammarene sapogenin (protopanaxadiol) in transgenic tobacco plants and cultured cells by heterologous expression of PgDDS and CYP 716A47[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 34(9): 1551-1560. DOI:10.1007/s00299-015-1806-9 . |
105 | MURATA J, MATSUMOTO E, MORIMOTO K, et al. 2015. Generation of Triple-Transgenic Forsythia Cell Cultures as a Platform for the Efficient, Stable, and Sustainable Production of Lignans[J/OL]. PLOS ONE, 10(12): e0144519. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144519 . |
106 | LU S, ZHANG Y, ZHU K, et al. 2018. The Citrus Transcription Factor CsMADS6 Modulates Carotenoid Metabolism by Directly Regulating Carotenogenic Genes[J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 176(4): 2657-2676. DOI:10.1104/pp.17.01830 . |
107 | DONG Y, DUAN W, HE H, et al. 2015. Enhancing taxane biosynthesis in cell suspension culture of Taxus chinensis by overexpressing the neutral/alkaline invertase gene[J/OL]. Process Biochemistry, 50(4): 651-660. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2015.01.018 . |
108 | CHEE M J Y, LYCETT G W, KHOO T J, et al. 2017. Bioengineering of the Plant Culture of Capsicum frutescens with Vanillin Synthase Gene for the Production of Vanillin[J/OL]. Molecular Biotechnology, 59(1): 1-8. DOI:10.1007/s12033-016-9986-2 . |
109 | HUSAIN Z, WARSI Z I, KHAN S, et al. 2024. Metabolic engineering of hairy root cultures in Beta vulgaris for enhanced production of vanillin, 4acid-hydroxybenzoic, and vanillyl alcohol[J/OL]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12: 1435190. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1435190 . |
110 | MAYER M J, NARBAD A, PARR A J, et al. 2001. Rerouting the Plant Phenylpropanoid Pathway by Expression of a Novel Bacterial Enoyl-CoA Hydratase/Lyase Enzyme Function[J/OL]. The Plant Cell, 13(7): 1669-1682. DOI:10.1105/TPC.010063 . |
111 | KITAOKA N, NOMURA T, OGITA S, et al. 2020. Bioproduction of glucose conjugates of 4-hydroxybenzoic and vanillic acids using bamboo cells transformed to express bacterial 4-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA hydratase/lyase[J/OL]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 130(1): 89-97. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.02.010 . |
112 | IMAMURA T, ISOZUMI N, HIGASHIMURA Y, et al. 2019. Isolation of amaranthin synthetase from Chenopodium quinoa and construction of an amaranthin production system using suspension-cultured tobacco BY-2 cells[J/OL]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(5): 969-981. DOI:10.1111/pbi.13032 . |
113 | HAN J Y, WANG H Y, CHOI Y E, 2014. Production of dammarenediol-II triterpene in a cell suspension culture of transgenic tobacco[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 33(2): 225-233. DOI:10.1007/s00299-013-1523-1 . |
114 | SOBRINO-MENGUAL G, ALVAREZ D, TWYMAN R M, et al. 2024. Activation of the native PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1 promoter by modifying near-miss cis-acting elements induces carotenoid biosynthesis in embryogenic rice callus[J/OL]. Plant Cell Reports, 43(5): 118. DOI:10.1007/s00299-024-03199-7 . |
115 | HIDALGO D, GEORGIEV M, MARCHEV A, et al. 2017. Tailoring tobacco hairy root metabolism for the production of stilbenes[J/OL]. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 17976. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-18330-w . |
116 | DEUS-NEUMANN B, ZENK M H, 1984. Instability of Indole Alkaloid Production in Catharanthus roseus Cell Suspension Cultures[J/OL]. Planta Medica, 50(5): 427-431. DOI:10.1055/s-2007-969755 . |
117 | ISHCHUK O P, DOMENZAIN I, SÁNCHEZ B J, et al. 2022. Genome-scale modeling drives 70-fold improvement of intracellular heme production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J/OL]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30): e2108245119. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2108245119 . |
118 | DE OLIVEIRA DAL'MOLIN C G, QUEK L E, PALFREYMAN R W, et al. 2010. AraGEM, a Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Primary Metabolic Network in Arabidopsis [J/OL]. Plant Physiology, 152(2): 579-589. DOI:10.1104/pp.109.148817 . |
119 | MURALI S, IBRAHIM M, RAJENDRAN H, 等, 2023. Genome-scale metabolic model led engineering of Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant cells for high camptothecin production[J/OL]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1207218. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1207218 . |
120 | LAKSHMANAN M, LIM S H, MOHANTY B, 等, 2015. Unraveling the light-specific metabolic and regulatory signatures of rice through combined in silico modeling and multi-omics analysis[J/OL]. Plant Physiology: pp.01379.2015. DOI:10.1104/pp.15.01379 . |
121 | CHOWDHURY N B, SIMONS-SENFTLE M, DECOUARD B, et al. 2023. A multi-organ maize metabolic model connects temperature stress with energy production and reducing power generation[J/OL]. iScience, 26(12): 108400. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108400 . |
122 | YUAN H, CHEUNG C Y M, POOLMAN M G, et al. 2016. A genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its application to photorespiratory metabolism[J/OL]. The Plant Journal, 85(2): 289-304. DOI:10.1111/tpj.13075 . |
123 | CUNHA E, SILVA M, CHAVES I, et al. 2023. The first multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic model of a woody plant highlights suberin biosynthesis pathways in Quercus suber[J/OL]. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(9): e1011499. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011499 . |
124 | ARANO-VARELA H, FERNÁNDEZ F J, ESTRADA-ZÚÑIGA M E, et al. 2020. Verbascoside production in long-term Buddleja cordata Kunth cell suspension cultures[J/OL]. 3 Biotech, 10(6): 245. DOI:10.1007/s13205-020-02222-4 . |
125 | TREJO-TAPIA G, BALCAZAR-AGUILAR J B, MARTÍNEZ-BONFIL B, et al. 2008. Effect of screening and subculture on the production of betaxanthins in Beta vulgaris L. var. -'Dark Detroit'-callus culture[J/OL]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 9(1): 32-36. DOI:10.1016/j.ifset.2007.04.009 . |
126 | COPPEDE J S, PINA E S, PAZ T A, et al. 2014. Cell cultures of Maytenus-ilicifolia-Mart. are richer sources of quinone-methide triterpenoids than plant roots in natura[J/OL]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 118(1): 33-43. DOI:10.1007/s11240-014-0459-7 . |
127 | ZHU X, MOHSIN A, ZAMAN W Q, et al. 2021. Development of a novel noninvasive quantitative method to monitor Siraitia grosvenorii cell growth and browning degree using an integrated computer-aided vision technology and machine learning[J/OL]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 118(10): 4092-4104. DOI:10.1002/bit.27886 . |
[1] | Mingwei SHAO, Simian SUN, Shimao YANG, Guoqiang CHEN. Bioproduction based on extremophiles [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(6): 1419-1436. |
[2] | Fanghuan ZHU, Xuecong CEN, Zhen CHEN. Research progress of diols production by microbes [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(6): 1367-1385. |
[3] | Yining LIU, Wei PU, Jinxing YANG, Yu WANG. Recent advances in the biosynthesis of ω-amino acids and lactams [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(6): 1350-1366. |
[4] | Haotian ZHENG, Chaofeng LI, Liangxu LIU, Jiawei WANG, Hengrun LI, Jun NI. Design, optimization and application of synthetic carbon-negative phototrophic community [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 1189-1210. |
[5] | Xiaolei CHENG, Tiangang LIU, Hui TAO. Recent research progress in non-canonical biosynthesis of terpenoids [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 1050-1071. |
[6] | Zhongyu CHENG, Fuzhuo LI. Recent advances in chemoenzymatic synthesis of natural products via site- selective P450 oxidation [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 960-980. |
[7] | Zijian LIU, Baiyang MU, Zhiqiang DUAN, Xuan WANG, Xiaojie LU. Advances in the development of DNA-compatible chemistries [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 1102-1124. |
[8] | Shouqi ZHANG, Tao WANG, Yao KONG, Jiasheng ZOU, Yuanning LIU, Zhengren XU. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of natural products: evolution of synthetic methodology and strategy [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 913-940. |
[9] | Xiangqian XIE, Wen GUO, Huan WANG, Jin LI. Biosynthesis and chemical synthesis of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides containing aminovinyl cysteine [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(5): 981-996. |
[10] | Zhijun TANG, Youcai HU, Wen LIU. Enzymatic (4+2)- and (2+2)-cycloaddition reactions: fundamentals and applications of regio- and stereoselectivity [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 401-407. |
[11] | Jun ZHANG, Shixue JIN, Qian YUN, Xudong QU. Biosynthesis of the unnatural extender units with polyketides and their structural modifications for applications in medicines [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 561-570. |
[12] | Xiwei CHEN, Huaran ZHANG, Yi ZOU. Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering of fungal non-ribosomal peptides [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 571-592. |
[13] | Xuchang YU, Hui WU, Lei LI. Library construction and targeted BGC screening for more efficient discovery of microbial natural products [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 492-506. |
[14] | Jin FENG, Haixue PAN, Gongli TANG. Research advances in biosynthesis of natural product drugs within the past decade [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 408-446. |
[15] | Mengyu XI, Yiling HU, Yucheng GU, Huiming GE. Genome mining-directed discovery for natural medicinal products [J]. Synthetic Biology Journal, 2024, 5(3): 447-473. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||